Adlumin, an N-able company vs. Bitdefender GravityZone

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adlumin, an N-able company
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Adlumin is a security operations command center that simplifies complexity and keeps organizations of all sizes secure. Its technology and integrations create a platform that obtains security telemetry from across an organization to provide greater insights into security alerts and streamline workflows.N/A
Bitdefender GravityZone
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Bitdefender GravityZone combines multiple security services into a single platform to reduce the cost of building a trusted environment for endpoints.
$284.99
per year 10 devices
Pricing
Adlumin, an N-able companyBitdefender GravityZone
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
GravityZone Small Business Security
$284.99
per year 10 devices
GravityZone Business Security
$369.99
per year 10 devices
GravityZone Business Security Premium
$814.99
per year 10 devices
GravityZone Business Security Premium
Contact Sales
GravityZone Business Security Enterprise
Contact Sales
GravityZone XDR
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adlumin, an N-able companyBitdefender GravityZone
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details5 device license purchase minimum. Discounts available for multi-year subscriptions. 1st year discounts available (up to 30% off displayed price).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adlumin, an N-able companyBitdefender GravityZone
Considered Both Products
Adlumin, an N-able company
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
I don't remember the names of the other companies we looked into for this type of service, but Adlumin being tied to our RMM / EDR / backup vendor made it a much easier buy-in. We didn't need to go through the vendor management process, and the price tag gets lowered through …
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
We have not evaluated any other products to compare against Adlumin.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
I do not have another MDR solution to reference, as this is the company's first MDR product. However, I have worked with plenty of security solutions and vendors and have not gotten as much issue/noise as I have with this product. I believe with a lot of work, it can be a …
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
We are currently testing the Neighborhood Watch licenses provided through the MSP program on a limited set of devices, so it is still too early to fully assess how it performs or compares at scale.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
Adlumin is more user friendly and can do more than what I do with sentinelOne
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
It's the same thing with a different banner and interface. Kills resources, blocks everything that users want to use their computers for.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
Given how tightly knit things are with nAble and the proven consolidated pricing, it was only obvious that we keep everything with 1 company rather than separately.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
ArcticWolf has been a great product that we have used, but the ability that Adlumin has is extremely comparable for a fraction of the price. There are no hardware requirements with Adlumin, but it still has all of the abilities as ArcticWolf without the overheard. Again, the …
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
Azure Site Recovery and Cove Data Protection
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
My manager was the one who selected this as the way to train us.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
I have not looked into another MDR tool at this time.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
We toured Barracuda's MDR services before going with Adlumin, an N-able company, as we utilize Barracuda for email security. Overall, we prefered Adlumin due to its easier integration with N-Central and price point.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
Stellar Cyber was a mess. Hard to deploy, equally hard to manage, and we never could trust that it was corelating information correctly.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
S1 vigilance was being offboarded as I came on. From my understanding the false positive rates were a lot, and getting ahold of someone was very hard to do. We are likely not to go back, but are currently looking at Huntress, huntress is cheaper and has a good reputation, we'll …
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
Has more capabilities such as SOAR playbooks and better integration from an identity based perspective.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
The price was the main point. Most of the companies above have great products, but they are way overpriced for my company. N-able/Adlumin just made more sense to have everything needed in one place.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
Huntress seems to provide better human support, less onerous long-term lock-ins. The portal is friendlier in Huntress. The setup is easier. Time will tell if the security is as good but from all reports Huntress seems to be quite effective.
Chose Adlumin, an N-able company
Adlumin is much quicker at responding to issues. Automate only alerted and we had to disable the users manually.

Automate did not monitor Microsoft 365 activities so we had to rely on the old legacy calls from clients when issues arise.
Bitdefender GravityZone
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Former product not availale on TrustRadius but for us it was way easier to use, the problem is that it now poses ethic an possible security issues for us due to it being connected with some invading country.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender GravityZone was the best for both ease of use and cost. Their pricing model outweigh most others as its a very low cost per unit per month.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender was more of a robust solution than Webroot. It offers many more granular configurations than the competition but also includes more complexity to get it all set up and find how to configure all the additional features.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Much better company and product. In my experience, we got completely ripped off when broadcom bought Symantec and were told our 3 year licenses are now only 1 year licenses with no refund. Also was a much more seamless install and has caught way more threats than symantec ever …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender offered the largest number of tools with the smallest footprint of any providers we have tested and used. The cloud platform is very well thought out and will give us all the information we need very quickly. Resources required have been greatly reduced, both on …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
I find that Bitdefender GravityZone is more resilient to attack than the Norton product. I've been out to too many machines that have been compromised with the Norton Antivirus product on them. I trust Bitdefender to protect the device effectively against threats better than …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
I've a lot of experience with many EDR among the best in the market. In an incident response phase we usually test the malware detected against many EDR's and Bitdefender GravityZone is the only one that always detect the threat. Being constantly updated with the latest …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
We found Bitdefender to be better. In our attempts to infect a test Windows 10 VM's we could not get around Bitdefender. Additionally, we have not had any complaints about performance once installed. That was not the case with Symantec.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
I think these days all of the products are extremely quick at updating the definitions as soon as they come out. Bitdefender is no different. It updates and catches threats on our endpoints and alerts the user with a very visible pop-up warning. It also quarantines threats …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Very effective. If we would've stayed with Kaspersky, we would've gotten infected by ransomware.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
It's night and day between Kaspersky and Bitdefender [GravityZone]. We previously used Kaspersky both internally and throughout our customer base. It was a resource hog and allowed many threats to get through. It never updated properly and was in my opinion, a piece of junk. …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender GravityZone beats all other competitors. It runs with a very small footprint, yet catches anything thrown at it. We will never change AV providers.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
We tested many different antivirus programs before deciding to go with Bitdefender GravityZone. Bitdefender [GravityZone] caught numerous threats that made it through the other AVs. It also uses considerably fewer system resources than its competitors.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
While most anti-virus/threat management software is highly effective, Bitdefender [GravityZone] consistently ranks as best in class when it comes to threat management. The [sheer] fact that of the nearly 100 computers I manage, not a single one has experienced a virus outbreak …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
We were a Kaspersky shop for years. Kaspersky was a resource hog and it didn't even block half of what was thrown at it. We had more outbreaks and more end-user complaints in a year of Kaspersky then we have had in almost three years of Bitdefender.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
We have not regretted moving to Bitdefender GravityZone. It's much easier to manage and the product is less noticeable on the machines it is installed. There are very little false positives and up till now we have not had any outbreaks of viruses in the company. They were …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
I believe it’s pretty effective compared to others. Bitdefender GravityZone does have robust protection. Having used Carbon Black and Kaspersky, all solutions are pretty reliable and top tier.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
We were using McAfee and it just caused issue after issue and so now with BD GZ we do not have to worry about machine lock up or even the issues of updates as BD keep the software updated with the latest information that we need to ensure our customer are protected.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender GravityZone is easier to use compared to other platforms. I found others to be convoluted in their program management features.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Since we haven't had any outbreaks, I would say it is very effective as prevention. When we used Vipre, we became infected.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
They all seem to do a decent job at stopping attacks, but for the cost and features I felt I could not go wrong selecting Bitdefender while I was comparing the others.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Detection of the others is more basic and less layered. Also, the lack of add-on modules, especially EDR, is a deal breaker. Most of all, the centralized management with a cloud console is lacking and therefore hardware is required.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Very effective. As mentioned previously, the product just works. We have had no threats that were not taken care of by GravityZone. Previous alternatives had failed on a number of levels, requiring a lot of additional remediation/repair.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
When compared to Trend Micro Worry Free Business Security software, Bitdefender GravityZone is just as good or better. We have not had any software or security issues while using either so it is difficult to say which one responds to and handles threats better. I do like both …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
When it comes down to it, I feel that both Bitdefender GravityZone and Sophos achieve the same results, and that's what really matters. My personal opinion is that Sophos provides a much more robust console that makes a lot more sense when navigating. I've often gotten so lost …
Features
Adlumin, an N-able companyBitdefender GravityZone
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Adlumin, an N-able company
-
Ratings
Bitdefender GravityZone
8.4
Ratings
2% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Centralized Management00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Malware Detection00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Adlumin, an N-able companyBitdefender GravityZone
Small Businesses
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
Score 8.4 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adlumin, an N-able companyBitdefender GravityZone
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(0 ratings)
6.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.7
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.2
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.6
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adlumin, an N-able companyBitdefender GravityZone
Likelihood to Recommend
Based on our experience, Adlumin is well-suited for high‑confidence, true‑positive security events that require rapid detection and response. When the signal is clear, especially around confirmed malicious behavior, the platform works well and adds real value through automation and SOC engagement. Adlumin has been less effective with heavy use of legitimate administrative tools such as RMM, vulnerability scanners, and scripted activity. In these scenarios, we have seen repeated false positives, hasty server isolations, and actions taken without adequate human validation, leading to operational disruption and increased alert fatigue.
Read full review
It just works. I have seen multiple viruses and malware get past other antivirus software like TrendMicro, Webroot, and Kaspersky. Bitdefender GravityZone always catches what others miss. It has a very light footprint when it comes to system resources. The centralized management console is nice, but I prefer the console before they redesigned the UI.
Read full review
Pros
  • Monitor our network from outside extrusion.
  • patching end point devices.
  • EDR detection dashboard.
  • End point monitoring for internal issues.
  • Creating task to perform computer clean up.
Read full review
  • The Gravity Zone console is quite easy to use, particularly if the person assigned to implement and deploy have a good understanding of how to make it work to get at the information needed.
  • The Dashboard is customizable to get at the information needed in one location.
  • Pushing tasks across the network is quite easy.
  • Having said the what is available in gravity zone, it is easy to see what devices have activity that frequently result in quarantines. This allows us to address "misuse" of our devices. Which brings me to my final point...
  • The policies can be set up to lock devices down with very strict rules (such as device locking) or with relaxed policies.
Read full review
Cons
  • The UI is difficult to navigate
  • It's hard to locate tickets and track them through the portal
  • Wish there were a series of training videos or courses through the training section in the portal to become more comfortable with using the product
  • Wish there was a better integration with the N-Sight dashboard to be able to better visualize or spot issues occurring
Read full review
  • I wish we could access logs from the cloud-based product. Not just in a viewable sense but from a download so that we can scrape them for interesting strings.
  • Bitdefender needs to make it easier to export data from the web interface. As it stands now, it's a time-consuming copy and paste activity.
  • I would like for there to a notification service when someone encounters malware. For example, an email to our IT team when someone's Bitdefender quarantines a file.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We love the security it provides our clients and for us.
Read full review
It works. I rely heavily on my vendors to provide a product that works, is easy to implement, and that they support. As well as be a decent value for the money
Read full review
Usability
A number of integrations were simple to set up and well documented, but a few things were difficult or undocumented yet. Some sections feel over-complicated and others feel way too vague during the setup process. Once the onboarding is finished though, the product is very simple, but there is a learning curve at the beginning.
Read full review
The console is easy to use, but has grown to have a lot of functionality. The only challenge is that all functions (even disabled and not installed ones) are shown. It would be great if only the functions that are active would be visible.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Yes its very available. The software continues to protect you even if you are offline. It constantly runs in the background and will check for updates again once back online.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The console is quite fast and responsive, and once you start to get used to it, it is easy to use and you can see the main dashboard status at a glance. You can then dig deeper into the individual Companies / Endpoint clients and check the status of each. The software itself is not heavy on system resources in each PC.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Support is an area Bitdefender has always struggled with. While their products work great, the GravityZone dashboard is very technical in nature. If you aren't IT inclined, it could be difficult to setup. While most times support is helpful, we tend to work with them over email because of their very thick accent, they are hard to understand over the phone.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The trainer went through everything in the console an showed me what each setting did. If I had any questions on how to do something, he showed me where to go and how to do it. The trainer was very helpful and knowledgeable, and also professional and patient. Highly recommended.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The trainer went through everything in the console an showed me what each setting did. If I had any questions on how to do something, he showed me where to go and how to do it. The trainer was very helpful and knowledgeable, and also professional and patient. Highly recommended.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I don't remember the names of the other companies we looked into for this type of service, but Adlumin being tied to our RMM / EDR / backup vendor made it a much easier buy-in. We didn't need to go through the vendor management process, and the price tag gets lowered through multiple-service discounts :-D
Read full review
Bitdefender offered the largest number of tools with the smallest footprint of any providers we have tested and used. The cloud platform is very well thought out and will give us all the information we need very quickly. Resources required have been greatly reduced, both on Endpoints and in the day-to-day management of the product. We also gained Patch management and vulnerability scanning as part of the switch, which has enabled us to keep on top of updates, making the environment more secure.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I give it this rating because one you have the console running, you can add or remove whole companies, add computer endpoints (and remove them), and easily create and deploy endpoint packages to the machines that need the software. Once installed, the software starts to report back to the Bitdefender servers and the number of active licences is then seen and billed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We used to be with an MSP before I was hired, and the company spent over 20K per year for that service. With N-Able, we have reduced the cost by over half.
  • I spend minimal time now patching computers because this is all automated. I sometimes have to patch a couple of machines because I missed a patch, but it has saved me a great deal of time.
  • I save a great deal of time with Board Reports because they are automatically generated for me each month.
Read full review
  • Estimating the ROI with Bitdefender [GravityZone] is rather difficult. While there is an obvious cost to using Bitdefender [GravityZone] (via a monthly or yearly subscription fee for each device being protected), it is hard to estimate the cost of if a computer or computers become infected via a piece of malware. In the best-case scenario, a single computer becomes infected with a relatively benign piece of malware that can be removed after infection; in a worst-case scenario, an entire infrastructure is infected by ransomware completely crippling an organization.
  • Since implementing Bitdefender [GravityZone] across multiple organizations, not a single one has [added] a malware outbreak.
  • The initial cost of setup and the cost of maintenance is more than worth it for if nothing more than peace of mind.
Read full review
ScreenShots