TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Airtable

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AAirtable is a web-based application builder that combines spreadsheet usability with relational database architecture. The platform enables users to construct custom operational applications, configure automated workflows, and design tailored interfaces without traditional software development.

    $24

    per month per seat

    Claris FileMaker

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AClaris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.

    $21

    per month per user

    Muse mBaaS

    N/AN/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    AirtableClaris FileMakerMuse mBaaS
    Editions & Modules
    Team
    $24
    per month per user
    Business
    $54
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Platform Subscription
    $21
    per month per user
    Individual desktop license
    $594
    one-time fee
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AirtableClaris FileMakerMuse mBaaS
    Free Trial
    YesNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AirtableClaris FileMakerMuse mBaaS
    Considered Multiple Products
    Airtable
    Chose Airtable
    Our existing database was created for us several years ago in Filemaker. It is incredibly sophisticated but often times is proving to be challenging to operate or update for current uses. Airtable has provided a level of flexibility to create a number of workarounds outside of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Airtable
    Airtable offers fewer features when it comes to HTML/web forms and user management, but has great plugins, and its straight-forward, intuitive UI offers a solution for users looking for an immediate answer on cloud-based relational database challenges.
    Incentivized
    Chose Airtable
    Airtable is much more intuitive to a naive user than Filemaker. Development time is also greatly reduced.
    Incentivized
    Chose Airtable
    I am very familiar with FileMaker Pro. I grew up on FMP. But unless you "grew up" with FMP, the learning curve for newbies is really steep. Also, we are a very small, start-up nonprofit and Airtable not only fits our immediate needs but it also will allow us to grow into the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Airtable
    Intuitive, easy to use, fast, great for attachments (uploading in behind other processes - the app actually really works while it finishes uploads)
    Incentivized
    Chose Airtable
    I've stated this in earlier sections but to put it simply, Airtable provides a way to create a customizable database with standardized metadata across archival collections without being overly complex or costly. This has supported our description of paper materials. The pro–a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Airtable
    Airtable was a more affordable, more mobile, and more versatile platform. The options for future integration were greater for us with Airtable; the mobile opportunities give our Foundation flexibility; and since our team is based in several locations, the sharing and cloud …
    Incentivized
    Chose Airtable
    Better integration for Teamwork. Better GUI. Pricing.
    Incentivized
    Claris
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    Easy to get started and Includes starter solutions for every situation by Anyone with access can edit the program by using many plugins available to extend functionality such as Changing field/database/script names after the fact is free specially For the most part, drag and …
    Incentivized
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    48 Answers
    93%
    Would buy again
    13 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    40 Answers
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    49 Answers
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    39 Answers
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    40 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AirtableClaris FileMakerMuse mBaaS
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Airtable and Claris FileMaker and Muse mBaaS
    Feature
    Airtable
    7.8
    235 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Claris FileMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Muse mBaaS
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management8.9199 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Management8.0193 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts8.489 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling7.4165 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation8.0143 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Team Collaboration7.9218 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology8.3108 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology8.580 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document Management7.5170 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email integration7.2115 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access5.9191 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking7.893 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management8.2102 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management7.1127 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Low-Code Development
    Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Airtable and Claris FileMaker and Muse mBaaS
    Feature
    Airtable
    -
    Ratings
    Claris FileMaker
    7.9
    4 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Muse mBaaS
    -
    Ratings
    Visual Modeling00 Ratings8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings3.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Security00 Ratings9.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform User Management00 Ratings7.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reusability00 Ratings8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Scalability00 Ratings9.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AirtableClaris FileMakerMuse mBaaS
    Small Businesses
    Any.do
    Score8 out of 10
    Zoho Creator
    Score7.7 out of 10
    NativeScript
    Score4.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    KanbanFlow
    Score7.3 out of 10
    AppSheet
    Score8.2 out of 10
    SAP Extension Suite (discontinued)
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft To Do
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Oracle APEX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AirtableClaris FileMakerMuse mBaaS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (239 ratings)
    8.0
    (51 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.5
    (5 ratings)
    5.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (36 ratings)
    8.8
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (30 ratings)
    1.0
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AirtableClaris FileMakerMuse mBaaS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Airtable
    Airtable is an ideal platform for small and growing businesses to keep track of just about EVERYTHING they need to keep things running smoothly. It's a great way to keep tasks organized, and keep everyone on the same page with progress on all things. Our company finds the kanban particularly useful, as products go through a lifecycle from ideation to retirement, it's good to keep a database of what is in production, what's working, and what we've tried before. I can see the platform being challenging with much larger businesses, but for the small to medium businesses I've used the platform with, it is ideal.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    If your company is really small, I can understand the need for a product like this. However, I would go for MS Access... FileMaker Pro can not be integrated with other systems (like MS Access can at least be handled by C# for instance, and can be integrated with MS Excel or even SQL server). I'm really not sure in what scenario one would choose for FileMaker Pro. If your application or company grows bigger, you're going to have a problem to move to another environment. Also, the fact that only one person can work with the backend at any given time is a problem in a somewhat larger company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Airtable
    • I can create tables, create and customize fields
    • Airtable has capabilities commonly found in spreadsheet applications, but also has some of the features found in databases.
    • The ability to filter fields. I set up a filter on the status field, so when a project is marked, complete, on hold, or canceled, that record is hidden from my current projects table view. If it is marked complete, the record is moved to the completed projects table view. In this way I can easily access a record of past projects
    • Being able to duplicate tables and create alternate views
    • Collapse and expand records. When I collapse the rows, I can easily scan current projects, next steps, project status, and due dates. When I expand the row, or field, I can see more detailed information about that field or record very easily. I can also expand or open the entire record. This is is helpful, when I am entering a lot of information to multiple fields in that record.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
    • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
    • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
    • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Airtable
    • When records are deleted, there could be more options for what happens to associated records in other tables.
    • Multi-select fields should be sortable.
    • The per-user pricing model can be cumbersome when you need to share bases with third parties but can't use a publicly accessible URL.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    • Developer features need to be beefed up - namely adding the ability to search code for a phrase or keyword and the ability to do the same in the "relationship graph" in the database.
    • Add ability for users to edit the same table record at the same time by version control.
    • Allow Filemaker Server to use more than 1 core; currently multi-processing is not supported and it can be tricky to find just the right server to support the application you've built to the fullest capacity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    Airtable
    We will 10/10 renew the use of Airtable because it has brought great value to our team. Not only is Airtable affordable, but it's also user-friendly and helps our team be efficient. We no longer need to rely on Excel spreadsheets being passed from person to person via email. Furthermore, we aren't dealing with corrupt Excel spreadsheets and the need to salvage data when a file is accidentally altered.
    Read full review
    Claris
    It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Airtable
    IMO the usability of this product is its greatest asset. The UI is clean and the menus are intuitive to the point where I'd feel confident having a non-spreadsheety colleague take on building an Airtable for the first time with next to no training. I can't say that about every table-like software product that I've used such as Notion.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Airtable
    I have rarely experience downtime, compared to other tools, and given how much time we spend on the tool. Even if there were to be, their updates on it are very timely, and our support team are able to provide any questions regarding
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Airtable
    I never had any issues with load time, even with the integrations that we use today (google sheets) However, I'm curious if adding additional layers of integrations would slow down performance. We do carry quite a bit of data in Airtable, but, again, no impact on overall performance
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Airtable
    Airtable has great support. They have a variety of support features to answer any questions. They have great self teaching instructions for templates and product tours. They also have support for teams and project management. They also have a fantastic customer help line. They are able and willing to answer customer questions and never have customers waiting long
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    Airtable
    This training was done in-house, but the Airtable team provided resources and how to guides to ensure that we covered all components of the system
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Airtable
    Recorded trainings were provided by the Airtable team. Great as an evergreen resources to new team members and for anyone that wants to refresh their Airtable knowledge
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    No answers on this topic
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Airtable
    Training all users was an important part of the implementation, which did take considerable time and effort. At first glance without training, the content calendar can be overwhelming because of the amount of data. The features within Airtable seem to be endless but our team was able to identify the most important to be successful.
    Read full review
    Claris
    Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Airtable
    Airtable was a really good fit for this specific use case as it provided a huge number of collaboration features in an intuitive and pleasant-to-use interface. The free tier worked initially with our work, and the upgrade pathway was fair and made sense for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    FileMaker is still the quickest way to go from zero to having a minimum viable working solution. Simple solutions can be built in as little as a afternoon of development. It is the only tool I am aware of which allows tech savy end users with domain knowledge to build bespoke apps for their businesses without undertaking professional software development training.
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Airtable
    I did not help purchase the product, but Airtable's per user pricing structure is inconvenient when some users only need occasional or read-only use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    No answers on this topic
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Airtable
    There are TONS of opportunity to scale, but I think it's a matter if you have the time and resources to do so because the initial setup can be fairly time consuming and prioritized dedication
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Airtable
    • It gives us a real-time experience of working.
    • Through this platform, I always have the idea bout which of my team member is working on which particular part of the project, I can easily track their progress, and also I can easily correct them where it is required by adding sticky notes, by sending the attachments and URLs.
    • Quality services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    • We are a more agile company because of FileMaker. A few of us who are tech-savvy enough to manage the database (but are not professional developers) can make needed adjustments to our database without having to employ an in-house developer or contract with a 3rd party. As our business processes evolve and change, it's easy to update the database to accommodate those changes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Muse GRAVITY
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots

    Airtable Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot