Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) vs. IBM Power Virtual Server
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | The Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, elastic file system for Linux-based workloads for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. | $0.04 per GB |
IBM Power Virtual Server | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | IBM presents their Power Systems Virtual Server as a scalable, cost-effective way to run IBM AIX, IBM i and Linux workloads. | N/A |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | IBM Power Virtual Server | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There is no minimum fee or setup charge. You pay only for the storage you use, for read and write access to data stored in Infrequent Access storage classes, and for any provisioned throughput. Amazon EFS offers four storage classes: two standard storage classes, including Amazon EFS Standard and Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (EFS Standard-IA), and two One Zone storage classes, including Amazon EFS One Zone and Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | IBM Power Virtual Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 98% Would buy again 193 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 99% Delivers good value for the price 187 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 99% Happy with the feature set 194 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 99% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 165 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Implementation went as expected 177 Answers | |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | IBM Power Virtual Server | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | IBM Power Virtual Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | IBM Power Virtual Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.5 | 9.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.5 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 8.2 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 9.1 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 7.0 |
| Configurability | - | 9.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 7.5 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | IBM Power Virtual Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |




