Amazon RDS vs IBM Cloudant | TrustRadius

What users are saying about

Score 9 out of 10

Based on 107 reviews and ratings

Score 8.5 out of 10

Based on 108 reviews and ratings

Feature Rating Comparison

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Automatic software patching

Database scalability

Automated backups

Database security provisions

Monitoring and metrics

Automatic host deployment

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Performance

Availability

Concurrency

Security

Scalability

Data model flexibility

Deployment model flexibility

Pros

For engineers with experience managing databases, setup is simple. And for the uninitiated, the RDS console interface becomes intuitive with some practice.
Not having the maintain the underlying infrastructure is a great benefit of using RDS. Patching and backups can be scheduled from the console and from then on are pretty much automated.
Right-sizing the DB instance to perform optimally with an application can be a very simple procedure. If a DB instance is not struggling to keep up, the instance size can be scaled up with just a few clicks.
Baseline configurations are generally sane for most RDS instances. This allows novice developers and engineers to get the most out of the service without being a complete database administrator.

Read full review

Michael Jenkins

Senior Systems Reliability Engineer

The Walt Disney CompanyEntertainment, 10,001+ employees

View all 40 answers on this topic

For us, performance and scalability is the key, and Cloudant DB backed by CouchDB is scalable and performant.
IBM Cloudant dB is very easy to provision for sandbox, development, QA as well as production.
Support for Java for CouchDB app server analytics enables a greater control for over developers.
Schema free oriented very easy to program and build applications on it.
We love it!!

Read full review

Naresh Jasotani

Director - Data and Analytics Services (Presales)

Miracle Software Systems, IncComputer Software, 1001-5000 employees

View all 34 answers on this topic

Cons

There should be a proper listing of all parameter groups alongside the instances that they are attached to. This would help to see which instances would be affected if a parameter group is changed.
RDS should allow SUPER privilege to the master user. A few advanced tasks(like getting a physical backup using MySQL Enterprise Backup) fail because SUPER privilege is not available for the master user.
A few parameters are not modifiable in the parameter groups and the access to the server filesystem is not given. This should not be the case because as an advanced user, you might want to understand things a little deeper.

Read full review

Software Developer

ezDIHealth, Wellness and Fitness, 201-500 employees

View all 40 answers on this topic

It was only after we went with the cloud-based solution that IBM rolled out an on-premise version.
We found that a 3rd-party ODBC driver was required for a few applications that needed to pull data out of Cloudant.
The sales process was difficult because the salesperson we used was not as versed on Cloudant as I had hoped.

Read full review

Verified User

Analyst in Marketing

Retail Company, 51-200 employees

View all 34 answers on this topic

Likelihood to Renew

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant 7.3

Based on 1 answer

the flexibility of NoSQL allow us to modify and upgrade our apps very fast and in a convenient way. Having the solution hosted by IBM is also giving us the chance to focus on features and the improvement of our apps. It's one thing less to be worried about

Read full review

victor pease solano

General Manager

SupermioComputer Software, 1-10 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Usability

Amazon RDS 8.8

Based on 5 answers

The vast majority of things you'd want to do in Amazon Relational Database Service are simple to accomplish and remarkably consistent across database engines. Pricing, scalability and monitoring are easy to configure. If I had one complaint, it's that database engine specific features are not well documented in AWS, requiring reading external documentation in order to use some database systems to the fullest. But for most use cases, the defaults available in AWS are simple, easy to use, and good enough.

Read full review

Verified User

Professional in Information Technology

Human Resources Company, 51-200 employees

View all 5 answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant 7.7

Based on 5 answers

It's mostly just a straight forward API to a data store. I knock one off for the full text search thing, but I don't need it much anyways. Also, the dashboard UI they give is pretty nice to use. It provides syntax-highlighting for writing views and queries are easy to test. I wish other DBs had a UI like this.

Read full review

Developer

Qubit NetworksTelecommunications, 11-50 employees

View all 5 answers on this topic

Reliability and Availability

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant 8.2

Based on 2 answers

it is a highly available solution in the IBM cloud portfolio and hence we have never had any issues with the data base being available - we also do continuous replication to be on the safer side just in case some thing goes awry. We also perform twice a year disaster recovery tests.

Read full review

Shiv Shivakumar

customer service leader

ifoxComputer Software, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Performance

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant 8.2

Based on 2 answers

very easy to get started and is very developer friendly given that it uses couchDB analytics. It is a cloud based solution and hence there is no hardware investment in a server and staging the server to get started and the associated delays/bureaucracy involved to get started. Good documentation is also available.

Read full review

Shiv Shivakumar

customer service leader

ifoxComputer Software, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Support Rating

Amazon RDS 8.9

Based on 25 answers

The product is fairly straight forward to use, and staff as well as knowledge base is pretty good for getting answers you may need. The product is a great, flexible alternative to adding to one's own in-house infrastructure. It's especially useful for environments that you aren't sure about the overall long term need. Amazon Relational Database Service is great for environments that once you determine the long term need, can be maintained by Amazon.

Read full review

President, Principal

Klaxon IT SolutionsHospital & Health Care, 11-50 employees

View all 25 answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant 8.6

Based on 6 answers

Very happy by the commitment given by the team which has been really good over the last 7 years of usage.

Read full review

Nicolas Peeters

VP of Engineering

AirFi / MI AirlineInformation Technology and Services, 11-50 employees

View all 6 answers on this topic

Online Training

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant 7.3

Based on 1 answer

online resources are good enough to understand but there is nothing like testing. In our case, we discovered some not documented behavior that we take in count now. Also, the experience in NodeJs is critical. Also, take in count that most of the "good practices" with cloudant are not in online courses but in blogs and pages from independent developers

Read full review

victor pease solano

General Manager

SupermioComputer Software, 1-10 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Implementation Rating

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant 8.2

Based on 8 answers

Test the architecture on CouchDB helped us to address initial design flaws.
The migration to Cloudant as such was very painless.
We have migrate our replication system to Cloudant Android Sync for mobile devices.
We have regular informal contact with the Cloudant leadership to discuss our use cases and implementation strategies.

Read full review

Nicolas Peeters

VP of Engineering

AirFi / MI AirlineInformation Technology and Services, 11-50 employees

View all 8 answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

Amazon Relational Database Service will probably give you everything you need from a traditional manual DB setup, except everything is managed for you. The only downside is having to pay the premium for the service; however, the trade-off of not having to deal with the intricacies involved with database administration, make it well worth it for most.

Read full review

Gabriel Samaroo

Senior Software Engineer

RocketripComputer Software, 11-50 employees

View all 40 answers on this topic

It's easier to use than Dynamo, more open than Firebase, and has better documentation that CouchDB... it might not be fair to compare Modulus, Modulus obviously suffers from some scalability issues and might not be in the same class... but its a hosted DB service we had some experience with in the past....

Read full review

CTO (Chief Technical Officer)

YukonBabyHospital & Health Care, 1-10 employees

View all 34 answers on this topic

Scalability

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant 8.6

Based on 21 answers

As a DB-as-a-Service, Cloudant has freed us from this kind of problem. Using the IBM Bluemix dashboard you can control how many transaction are executed in milliseconds and this is for now our rating of scalability between 200-24 milliseconds for one http POST (insert document), well under the project rate that was defined by an order of magnitude.

Read full review

Owner

NEWLOG Consulting SrlComputer Software, 11-50 employees

View all 21 answers on this topic

Return on Investment

Switching back to RDS from Redshift has made my BI Dashboards much more performant (though again, we're not dealing with data in the magnitudes that justify the Redshift toolset).
It has decreased our tech debt. Engineering has been much more straight forward.
Our uptime has been improved by removing unnecessary data migration processes.

Read full review

Senior Project Manager

OnMetricInternet, 11-50 employees

View all 40 answers on this topic

Saving in-terms of cost of procuring and maintaining hardware, which will be realized over the next 5 years.
Positive ROI in terms of the number of FTEs involved in maintaining our databases; our DBAs can now focus on other important and business critical applications.
Best ROI in terms of our organization's vision - they are no longer anxious / nervous to move to the cloud. We are already on the CLOUD.

Read full review

Naresh Jasotani

Director - Data and Analytics Services (Presales)

Miracle Software Systems, IncComputer Software, 1001-5000 employees

View all 34 answers on this topic

Screenshots

—

Pricing Details

General

Free Trial

—

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

Optional

Free to try. Pay only for what you use with no minimum fee.

Amazon RDS Editions & Modules

Edition

Amazon RDS for MySQL	$0.29 ($0.58)¹
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL	$0.24 ($0.48)¹
Amazon RDS for MariaDB	$0.25 ($0.50)¹
Amazon RDS for Oracle	$0.482 ($0.964)¹
Amazon RDS for SQL Server	$1.02 ($1.52)¹

per hour, R5 Large (R5 Extra Large)

Additional Pricing Details

—

General

Free Trial

Yes

Free/Freemium Version

Yes

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Yes

Entry-level set up fee?

No

IBM Cloudant Editions & Modules

—

Additional Pricing Details

—

Rating Summary

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Amazon RDS

IBM Cloudant

Add comparison