TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon SimpleDB

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AAmazon SimpleDB is a non-relational data store and service.

    $0

    per GB allowance

    Couchbase

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/ACouchbase is a distributed NoSQL database platform that combines a JSON document store with a high-performance In-Memory architecture. The solution is designed to support high-throughput applications by integrating multiple data services—including Key-Value, Full-Text Search (FTS), Vector Search, and Real-Time Analytics—within a single unified platform.N/A

    MySQL

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AMySQL is a popular open-source relational and embedded database, now owned by Oracle.N/A
    Pricing
    Amazon SimpleDBCouchbaseMySQL
    Editions & Modules
    Machine Utilization
    $0.00 for first 25 hours $0.14 per machine hour over 25 hours
    per GB allowance
    Structured Data Storage
    $0.00 for first GB-month $0.25 per GB-month thereafter
    per GB allowance
    Free Tier
    25 SimpleDB Machine Hours and 1 GB of Storage for free each month
    per GB allowance
    Data Transfer
    All data transfer in is $0.00 per GB
    per GB allowance
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon SimpleDBCouchbaseMySQL
    Free Trial
    NoYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon SimpleDBCouchbaseMySQL
    Considered Multiple Products
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Couchbase
    Chose Couchbase
    Google Cloud Spanner meant "vendor lock-in". Yugabyte was pre-mature for us at the time. MySQL was not meant for the size of our data.
    Incentivized
    Chose Couchbase
    The project we are developing with Couchbase, was very inconsistent for few years of the beginning. We had to change data model multiple times. We knew this before starting the project. So we had to choose a NoSQL solution. We also wanted a syncing solution. After some research …
    Incentivized
    Chose Couchbase
    The Apache Cassandra was one type of product used in our company for a couple of use-cases.
    The Aerospike is something we [analyzed] not so long time ago as an interesting alternative, due to its performance characteristics.
    The Oracle Coherence was and is still being used for …
    Incentivized
    Chose Couchbase
    Couchbase's server is more scalable than MongoDB, as MongoDB degrades its performance if the number of users grows. Also, Couchbase allows us to integrate more third-party applications, Couchbase’s query language extends ANSI SQL.
    Incentivized
    Chose Couchbase
    It's reliable. It's been the easiest to use NoSQL solution. Less overhead than standard SQL products.
    Incentivized
    Oracle
    Chose MySQL
    MySQL offers best conditions for a rapid adoption at the organization.
    Also because it's free software, you can scale up in implementations without worrying about licenses fees.
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    MySQL is open source, readily available, with no licencing issues. Adding a new web product to my existing setup is relatively straight forward. In order to set up a SQL Server site, significant IT and licencing costs are involved. We are implementing some SQL Server back ends …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Would buy again
    27 Answers
    94%
    Would buy again
    49 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    51 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    28 Answers
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    51 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    19 Answers
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    36 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Implementation went as expected
    20 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    46 Answers
    Features
    Amazon SimpleDBCouchbaseMySQL
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Amazon SimpleDB and Couchbase and MySQL
    Feature
    Amazon SimpleDB
    -
    Ratings
    Couchbase
    8.9
    97 Ratings
    4% above category average
    MySQL
    -
    Ratings
    Performance00 Ratings8.997 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability00 Ratings9.496 Ratings00 Ratings
    Concurrency00 Ratings8.994 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security00 Ratings9.094 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings9.495 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data model flexibility00 Ratings9.095 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings8.094 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon SimpleDBCouchbaseMySQL
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    MariaDB Platform
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    PostgreSQL
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    SQLite
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon SimpleDBCouchbaseMySQL
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (100 ratings)
    8.5
    (146 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    2.1
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.9
    (18 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.3
    (95 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (52 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon SimpleDBCouchbaseMySQL
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    Well suited for: Games, Chat rooms, real time software like corporate events, marathons and so. Anytime and anywhere you could use a NoSQL DB you should think of SimpleDB.
    As an arduous AWS user, Amazon SimpleDB easily integrates with EC2 and other AWS module; and if you are not an AWS user, you also have a fantastic tool that will solve the problem for which you are focused.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Couchbase
    Best suited when edge devices have interrupted internet connection. And Couchbase provides reliable data transfer. If used for attachment Couchbase has a very poor offering. A hard limit of 20 MB is not okay. They have the best conflict resolution but not so great query language on Couchbase lite.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    MySQL is best suited for applications on platform like high-traffic content-driven websites, small-scale web apps, data warehouses which regards light analytical workloads. However its less suited for areas like enterprise data warehouse, OLAP cubes, large-scale reporting, applications requiring flexible or semi-structured data like event logging systems, product configurations, dynamic forms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Flexibility
    • Easy to learn and use
    • AWS integration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Couchbase
    • Couchbase performance is exceptional both for in-memory and persisted transactions.
    • Handling of node failures and cluster rebalancing (high availability).
    • Enterprise support from Couchbase themselves
    • Good documentation
    • Streaming of bucket (database) level mutations via their Database Change Protocol (DCP).
    • Replication of datasets between native clients and Couchbase buckets
    • Handling of simultaneous writes to the same record with performance penalties
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Stable - it just runs, with minimal downtime or errors
    • Fast - well-structured data is quickly written and read
    • Secure - MySQL is easy to keep data secure from people and applications that shouldn't see it
    • Easy to use - SQL is industry standard so no problems with adding, editing and reading data stored in MySQL
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Non AWS environments
    • Strict storage limit (but well we have DynamoDB for storage issues)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Couchbase
    • The N1QL engine performs poorly compared to SQL engines due to the number of interactions needed, so if your use case involves the need for a lot of SQL-like query activity as opposed to the direct fetch of data in the form of a key/value map you may want to consider a RDBMS that has support for json data types so that you can more easily mix the use of relational and non-relational approaches to data access.
    • You have to be careful when using multiple capabilities (e.g. transactions with Sync Gateway) as you will typically run into problems where one technology may not operate correctly in combination with another.
    • There are quality problems with some newly released features, so be careful with being an early adopter unless you really need the capability. We somewhat desperately adopted the use of transactions, but went through multiple bughunt cycles with Couchbase working the kinks out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Learning curve: is big. Newbies will face problems in understanding the platform initially. However, with plenty of online resources, one can easily find solutions to problems and learn on the go.
    • Backup and restore: MySQL is not very seamless. Although the data is never ruptured or missed, the process involved is not very much user-friendly. Maybe, a new command-line interface for only the backup-restore functionality shall be set up again to make this very important step much easier to perform and maintain.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Couchbase
    I rarely actually use Couchbase Server, I just stay up-to-date with the features that it provides. However, when the need arises for a NoSQL datastore, then I will strongly consider it as an option
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    For teaching Databases and SQL, I would definitely continue to use MySQL. It provides a good, solid foundation to learn about databases. Also to learn about the SQL language and how it works with the creation, insertion, deletion, updating, and manipulation of data, tables, and databases. This SQL language is a foundation and can be used to learn many other database related concepts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Couchbase
    Couchbase has been quite a usable for our implementation. We had similar experience with our previous "trial" implementation, however it was short lived.
    Couchbase has so far exceeded expectation. Our implementation team is more confident than ever before.
    When we are Live for more than 6 months, I'm hoping to enhance this rating.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    I give MySQL a 9/10 overall because I really like it but I feel like there are a lot of tech people who would hate it if I gave it a 10/10. I've never had any problems with it or reached any of its limitations but I know a few people who have so I can't give it a 10/10 based on those complaints.
    Read full review
    Performance
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Couchbase
    One of Couchbase’s greatest assets is its performance with large datasets. Properly set up with well-sized clusters, it is also highly reliable and scalable. User management could be better though, and security often feels like an afterthought. Couchbase has improved tremendously since we started using it, so I am sure that these issues will be ironed out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Couchbase
    I haven't had many opportunities to request support, I will look forward to better the rating. We have technical development and integration team who reach out directly to TAM at Couchbase.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    We have never contacted MySQL enterprise support team for any issues related to MySQL. This is because we have been using primarily the MySQL Server community edition and have been using the MySQL support forums for any questions and practical guidance that we needed before and during the technical implementations. Overall, the support community has been very helpful and allowed us to make the most out of the community edition.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Couchbase
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    1. Estimate your data size. 2. Test, test, and test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    It integrates beautifully with AWS. In some projects we use SimpleDB while we use DynamoDB for others, according to the characteristics of the project. If the infrastructure is AWS, we always think of one of them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Couchbase
    The Apache Cassandra was one type of product used in our company for a couple of use-cases. The Aerospike is something we [analyzed] not so long time ago as an interesting alternative, due to its performance characteristics. The Oracle Coherence was and is still being used for [the] distributed caching use-case, but it will be replaced eventually by Couchbase. Though each of these products [has] its own strengths and weaknesses, we prefer sticking to Couchbase because of [the] experience we have with this product and because it is cost-effective for our organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    MongoDB has a dynamic schema for how data is stored in 'documents' whereas MySQL is more structured with tables, columns, and rows. MongoDB was built for high availability whereas MySQL can be a challenge when it comes to replication of the data and making everything redundant in the event of a DR or outage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Couchbase
    So far, the way that we mange and upgrade our clusters has be very smooth. It works like a dream when we use it in concert with AWS and their EC2 machines. Having access to powerful instances along side the Couchbase interface is amazing and allows us to do rebalances or maintenance without a worry
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Reduced database administration time
    • Reduced data model analysis time
    • Lower cost of resources in projects in general
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Couchbase
    • Great performance.
    • Leading Couchbase Lite capabilities for mobile use.
    • Developers' learning curve with replica reads and multi cluster can be long. Needs guidance and nurturing.
    • Cluster maintenance during OS patching, etc. has multiple ways to approach. Operational teams may need some guidance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • As it is an open source solution through community solution, we can use it in a multitude of projects without cost license
    • The acquisition by Oracle makes you need to contract support for the enterprise version
    • If you have knowledge about oracle databases, you can get more out of the enterprise version
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots