Anthropic Claude vs. ChatGPT

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Claude
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Anthropic is an AI research company whose product, Claude, is an AI assistant available for a variety of business tasks. Boasting a 100K+ token windows, Claude can handle complex multi-step instructions over large amounts of content.
$20
per month
ChatGPT
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
OpenAI offers ChatGPT, an advanced general intelligence (AGI) chatbot which interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests. ChatGPT is a sibling model to InstructGPT, which is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response.
$0
per month
Pricing
Anthropic ClaudeChatGPT
Editions & Modules
Pro
$20
per month
Team - Standard
$30
per month per seat (minimum 5)
Team - Premium
$150
per month per seat (minimum 5)
Max
from $100
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Free
$0
per month
Plus
$20
per month
Team
$30
per month per user
Pro
$200
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ClaudeChatGPT
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual billing and Pro, Max and Standard Team plans. Claude Code included in higher tier service. Usage-based billing available with API access plans with discount for batch processing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Anthropic ClaudeChatGPT
Considered Both Products
Claude
Chose Anthropic Claude
Anthropic Claude is just as good as any of the aforementioned platforms. We were using ChatGPT primarily before Claude. We have leaned more to Claude in recent months, but use other solutions to keep a balanced approach to research and analysis. We plan to keep Claude as a …
ChatGPT
Chose ChatGPT
ChatGPT is better than Anthropic Claude in terms of LLM models, outputs (for same queries) and is relatively easier to use. It also can enable us to build our own custom GPT agents and train them - which offers better data and analysis compared to Claude. Gemini is another …
Chose ChatGPT
I find that ChatGPT has the best overall system for user-friendly Ai. I like the customization options of this tool in comparison to others. The ease of setting up a custom GPT with knowledge and resources is great - you don't get that in other tools.

I also like the ability to …
Chose ChatGPT
For breaking news and very up to date data, Grok and Perplexity are better. They have access to very recent or proprietary data that's relevant to any topic you want to research. Gemini is great for large prompt context needs. I would use Claude for more coding related stuff. …
Chose ChatGPT
ChatGPT is simply the most complete, well-rounded AI tool in existence right now. It can do everything the others can, often better, and often in a way that's more intuitive and easier to iterate. It takes prompts far better than most, and incorporates direction better than …
Chose ChatGPT
In my experience ChatGPT does great job than any other LLM model at this moment. However, in terms of web search, Perplexity scores high compared to ChatGPT because ChatGPT misses critical news while doing web crawling
Chose ChatGPT
Where ChatGPT is better: ChatGPT has significantly more use cases - it's much more versatile. Some aspects of ChatGPT's user experience are better than Claude's. I prefer ChatGPT's results presentation compared to Claude's. Where Claude excels: Claude is a more skilled …
Chose ChatGPT
ChatGPT is an excellent writing, ideating, and editing assistant with an American attitude. This LLM learns from human input and can give very sound results in unexpected situations. 'Memory' feature is especially useful, because it saves a lot of time and effort, so the LLM …
Chose ChatGPT
In my experience, Claude won't say things it feels is offensive or callous (for instance I asked for themed slogans for a bachelor party where I was the best man), and only provided G and PG related content. ChatGPT was quick to get naughty with puns and slogans, especially …
Best Alternatives
Anthropic ClaudeChatGPT
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

LocaliQ
LocaliQ
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Piper the AI SDR by Qualified
Piper the AI SDR by Qualified
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Digital Assistant
Oracle Digital Assistant
Score 7.9 out of 10
Conversica
Conversica
Score 4.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Anthropic ClaudeChatGPT
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.4
(20 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.2
(19 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Anthropic ClaudeChatGPT
Likelihood to Recommend
Anthropic
Claude is well suited to help build documentation, strategic plans, and document analysis very well. I just recently had a client ask me for Terms & Conditions of a new service offering we are developing. I had Claude look at some existing artifacts we have already created and added some additional key points, to develop our T&C. Claude helped streamline the process in a few hours, that could have take several days to weeks to fine tune
Read full review
OpenAI
I’d definitely recommend ChatGPT to anyone as a great introduction to generative AI and as a starting point in research, writing, brainstorming, or general questions or judgement questions. It can be a great tool to use when you don’t necessarily need an accurate answer. For example, I wouldn’t let it calculate my taxes, but I’d use it to ask some general tax questions, then ask for sources and then verify by checking those sources. I also love ChatGPT for writing and questions - it’s great for emails, creating templates and outlines, and for generating spreadsheet formulas.
Read full review
Pros
Anthropic
  • Document review and analysis
  • deeper analysis and recommendations
  • strategic planning
  • document preparation and template development
  • Problem solving internally and for external clients
Read full review
OpenAI
  • Saves time by generating content about a specific topic very quickly
  • Allows us to quickly learn information online (from various sources or even a single lengthy article) into more summed up digestible paragraphs (and even bullet points)
  • Can autogenerate content on a vast amount of topics
Read full review
Cons
Anthropic
  • Claude does not create graphical images
  • Claude does not create Office type documents (Word, Excel, etc.)
  • I would like to see Claude with more integrations points
Read full review
OpenAI
  • Wish it had support for better slides generation. Sometimes we found ourselves using chatgpt to outline a presentation but build it ourselves or use a tool like Gamma
  • Maybe a chepear $10 plan. In some countries the US dollar can be expensive and $20 goes a long way.
  • I wish you could make projects with more files. They limit it. Or make the limit based on the content, not the number of files per se
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Anthropic
No answers on this topic
OpenAI
ChatGPT is a powerful assistant. As long as you understand what it is you're looking for in its results, it can save you a lot of time due to its ability to do the heavy lifting for you. This frees your time up to enable you to concentrate on other tasks.
Read full review
Usability
Anthropic
Claude is a trusted platform from our perspective. We have been using this platform (paid version) more and more the past few months. The value returned is more than worth it. As more integrations points happen, we see Claude being a long term part of our ecosystem. Data creation, analysis, and assessments can be a tedious process. Claude delivers robust and efficient outcomes that help us for on higher level tasks.
Read full review
OpenAI
It's a potent utility tool, personally and professionally. It’s also very convenient - it can be used for a wide range of things and scenarios, and when used correctly, it usually produces dependable results in
seconds. I would give it a full 10 if it didn't hallucinate as much as it does, and the image generator was more accurate.
Read full review
Support Rating
Anthropic
No answers on this topic
OpenAI
Their responses are always professional , although they delay sometimes
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Anthropic
Anthropic Claude is just as good as any of the aforementioned platforms. We were using ChatGPT primarily before Claude. We have leaned more to Claude in recent months, but use other solutions to keep a balanced approach to research and analysis. We plan to keep Claude as a core component of our tech stack moving forward, as it has proven value time and time again.
Read full review
OpenAI
I find that ChatGPT has the best overall system for user-friendly Ai. I like the customization options of this tool in comparison to others. The ease of setting up a custom GPT with knowledge and resources is great - you don't get that in other tools. I also like the ability to embed the application directly into the browser or computer. This is powerful and opens up addition features or tools
Read full review
Return on Investment
Anthropic
  • ROI is immediate in the consulting space. We draft documents for clients often and have the ability to produce exponential output with Claude.
  • Claude has allowed us to develop HTML and java code based on our requirements for a client. It has also helped identify bad code and shortened our development lifecycle
  • Claude has turned into a value added platform that we rely on to verify information and provide suggestions. We look at Claude as a strategic technology partner
Read full review
OpenAI
  • I can solve problems quickly. What would take some time, for example, writing an SPF string, ChatGPT can do it correctly in seconds if I it gives the correct information.
  • The best tool I've ever used for research. For example, I can ask ChatGPT to list all the villages, cities and townships in a specific county. And provide the URL link for each.
  • Problems that seem unsolvable, i.e. why is Gmal rejecting every message from our list server is answered with a number of suggestions that I can follow up with.
  • Basically, has elimited a tech support position in our company.
Read full review
ScreenShots