Apache Hadoop vs. Google Cloud Dataproc vs. Toad Database Developer Tools

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hadoop
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Hadoop is an open source software from Apache, supporting distributed processing and data storage. Hadoop is popular for its scalability, reliability, and functionality available across commoditized hardware.N/A
Google Cloud Dataproc
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Dataproc, on Google Cloud, is a fully managed and scalable service for running Apache Hadoop, Apache Spark, Apache Flink, Presto, and 30+ open source tools and frameworks. Dataproc is used for data lake modernization, ETL, and secure data science, at scale, integrated with Google Cloud. Key features Fully managed and automated big data open source software Serverless deployment, logging, and monitoring so users can focus on data and analytics, not on…N/A
Toad Database Developer Tools
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Toad by Quest is a database management toolset that database developers, administrators and data analysts use to simplify workflows, create code free from defects, automate frequent or repetitive processes, and minimize risks. Editions include Toad for Oracle, which automates administration tasks and helps proactively manage databases while embracing performance optimization and risk mitigation. Similar editions exist for IBM DB2, SQL Server, SAP, or MySQL and Postgres environments (Toad Edge).
$229
per year
Pricing
Apache HadoopGoogle Cloud DataprocToad Database Developer Tools
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Toad Edge For MySQL
$229
per year
Toad Edge For Postgres
$229
per year
Toad for SQL - Pro Edition
$437
per year
Toad for Oracle - Base Edition
$550
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Base Edition
$636
per year
Toad for SAP - Base Edition
$636
per year
Toad for SQL - Xpert Edition
$763
per year
Toad for Oracle - Professional Edition
$829
per year
Toad for SQL - Dev Edition
$930
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Pro Edition
$996
per year
Toad for Oracle - Professional DB Admin Edition
$1,370
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Xpert Edition
$1,529
per year
Toad for SAP - Xpert Edition
$1530
per year
Toad for Oracle - Xpert Plus Edition
$1,753
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Dev Edition
$1,861
per year
Toad for SAP - Dev Edition
$1863
per year
Toad for SAP - Xpert+ Edition
$2099
per year
Toad for SAP - DBA Edition
$3661
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HadoopGoogle Cloud DataprocToad Database Developer Tools
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache HadoopGoogle Cloud DataprocToad Database Developer Tools
Features
Apache HadoopGoogle Cloud DataprocToad Database Developer Tools
Database Development
Comparison of Database Development features of Product A and Product B
Apache Hadoop
-
Ratings
Google Cloud Dataproc
-
Ratings
Toad Database Developer Tools
8.5
32 Ratings
0% above category average
Version control tools00 Ratings00 Ratings8.918 Ratings
Test data generation00 Ratings00 Ratings6.025 Ratings
Performance optimization tools00 Ratings00 Ratings9.030 Ratings
Schema maintenance00 Ratings00 Ratings9.029 Ratings
Database change management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.528 Ratings
Database Administration
Comparison of Database Administration features of Product A and Product B
Apache Hadoop
-
Ratings
Google Cloud Dataproc
-
Ratings
Toad Database Developer Tools
9.1
32 Ratings
12% above category average
User management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.030 Ratings
Database security00 Ratings00 Ratings9.028 Ratings
Database status reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.529 Ratings
Change management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.022 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache HadoopGoogle Cloud DataprocToad Database Developer Tools
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.6 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudera Manager
Cloudera Manager
Score 9.9 out of 10
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 7.2 out of 10
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache HadoopGoogle Cloud DataprocToad Database Developer Tools
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(37 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(34 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.6
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(7 ratings)
Online Training
6.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache HadoopGoogle Cloud DataprocToad Database Developer Tools
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Altogether, I want to say that Apache Hadoop is well-suited to a larger and unstructured data flow like an aggregation of web traffic or even advertising. I think Apache Hadoop is great when you literally have petabytes of data that need to be stored and processed on an ongoing basis. Also, I would recommend that the software should be supplemented with a faster and interactive database for a better querying service. Lastly, it's very cost-effective so it is good to give it a shot before coming to any conclusion.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
Toad for Oracle is very well suited for all Oracle implementations, be it single instance or RAC. It is best suited for use of Oracle DBA, Developer and Database Engineers. I don't recommend Toad for Oracle for Project Managers or Solution Architects. This can be a pricier choice for these people. They can do fine with free options like SQL Developer.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Handles large amounts of unstructured data well, for business level purposes
  • Is a good catchall because of this design, i.e. what does not fit into our vertical tables fits here.
  • Decent for large ETL pipelines and logging free-for-alls because of this, also.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
  • Toad is a de-facto standard tool for data developers and analysts. Generally speaking it provides almost every function needed to manage data in EDW with great performance and stability.
  • The nature of clinical data is big-sized: one table may have billions of rows. Toad provides critical functions to manage SQLs, e.g. Top SQL that can monitor and manage SQLs using CPU power and network bandwidth, so that EDW administrator can optimize ETL operations in the best efficiency.
  • Many of our data analysts are not computer science backgrounded (having clinical / nursing background). Toad provides great auditing tools such as Tuning Lab or SQL Scanner, so that data analysts can train themselves with guidance of the tool.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Less organizational support system. Bugs need to be fixed and outside help take a long time to push updates
  • Not for small data sets
  • Data security needs to be ramped up
  • Failure in NameNode has no replication which takes a lot of time to recover
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
  • The power and control it gives is at the same time kind of a negative thing. There's too many options available, even when you don't need them. For simple database operations it's sometimes easier to just use SQL Developer since navigation is way more intuitive and easy.
  • Related with the above: there is a steep learning curve. However, since this is the main tool for any Oracle developer, this is not that much of a problem.
  • If I remember well, Toad used to be free, some 20 years ago. Or at least had a free version. It would be nice to have a free version. The dedicated Oracle developers and DBA's won't use the free version, but all the rest of us developers might use it instead of SQL Developer. It would make communications between everybody somewhat easier.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
Hadoop is organization-independent and can be used for various purposes ranging from archiving to reporting and can make use of economic, commodity hardware. There is also a lot of saving in terms of licensing costs - since most of the Hadoop ecosystem is available as open-source and is free
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
It is the preferred tool for our organization.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
As Hadoop enterprise licensed version is quite fine tuned and easy to use makes it good choice for Hadoop administrators. It’s scalability and integration with Kerberos is good option for authentication and authorisation. installation can be improved. logging can be improved so that it become easier for debugging purposes. parallel processing of data is achieved easily.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
I give is an 8 because nothing is a 10 and there is always room for improvement. I believe the user who is not as technologically inclined would be better suited with an easier way to identify the options for setting the layout up for Toad's GUI. To some it is very cumbersome and confusing.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
It's a great value for what you pay, and most Data Base Administrators (DBAs) can walk in and use it without substantial training. I tend to dabble on the analyst side, so querying the data I need feels like it can take forever, especially on higher traffic days like Monday.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
I give the overall support for Toad for Oracle a 10/10. This is because whenever there has been an issue with this software, our team has got an immediate response. The same can not be said for similar software. The most recent example of this is when we needed to renew our licenses. Some employees were unable to log in to code with the given license key. Support was able to resolve the issue quickly.
Read full review
Online Training
Apache
Hadoop is a complex topic and best suited for classrom training. Online training are a waste of time and money.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Apache
Not used any other product than Hadoop and I don't think our company will switch to any other product, as Hadoop is providing excellent results. Our company is growing rapidly, Hadoop helps to keep up our performance and meet customer expectations. We also use HDFS which provides very high bandwidth to support MapReduce workloads.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
Toad is much better than Tableau query writer. Tableau is not intuitive and requires knowledge of proprietary database language to fully implement. Tableau does not perform as quickly and accurately as Toad. Toad is very easy and slim to install. Additional hardware is often required to run Tableau smoothly. Support for Tableau is even more expensive than Toad support.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • There are many advantages of Hadoop as first it has made the management and processing of extremely colossal data very easy and has simplified the lives of so many people including me.
  • Hadoop is quite interesting due to its new and improved features plus innovative functions.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
  • Quick and easy query development helps reduce man-hours in a project which converts to real dollars.
  • Query analysis and tuning result in low database overhead and low latency, thus translating into real dollars because a system can thus handle more requests from customers.
  • Ease of use makes it easy to deploy greenhorns in projects with minimal training, thus helping save money. Otherwise menial and simple jobs would have required experienced DBAs.
Read full review
ScreenShots