TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    JMeter

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AJMeter, from Apache, is a load and performance testing tool.

    $0

    LoadComplete

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ASmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.

    $287

    one-time fee

    Pricing
    JMeterLoadComplete
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Subscription Starter
    $239
    per month 100 virtual users
    On-demand Starter
    $287
    one-time fee 100 virtual users
    Subscription Pro
    $699
    per month 1000 virtual users
    On-demand Pro
    $887
    one-time fee 1000 virtual users
    Subscription Premium
    $899
    per month 2500 virtual users
    On-demand Premium
    $1,139
    one-time fee 2500 virtual users
    Enterprise
    Let's chat
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    JMeterLoadComplete
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—On-demand plans contain a $4.99 monthly maintenance fee.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    JMeterLoadComplete
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    No answer on this topic
    SmartBear
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    JMeterLoadComplete
    Load Testing
    Comparison of Load Testing features of Apache JMeter and LoadComplete
    Feature
    Apache JMeter
    7.2
    24 Ratings
    17% below category average
    LoadComplete
    8.8
    4 Ratings
    3% above category average
    End to end performance management9.021 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Integrated performance data8.522 Ratings9.93 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility7.521 Ratings7.84 Ratings
    Real time monitoring6.521 Ratings7.94 Ratings
    Automated anomaly detection4.417 Ratings9.83 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    JMeterLoadComplete
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    JMeter
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    LoadRunner Professional
    Score8.5 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    JMeterLoadComplete
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (39 ratings)
    8.9
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.6
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    6.5
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    JMeterLoadComplete
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    JMeter is well suited for Java applications where the user can script the scenario once and make changes to accommodate for as many numbers of users for load test execution. The image and selection of any files or exporting files scenario is handled well.
    It is less appropriate to test Ajax applications where it is required to script click per use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    I think that LoadComplete is adequate when you have Testcomplete. If LoadComplete is not paired with Testcomplete then there would be a bit of a learning curve. People who are already using Testcomplete will find it easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has a lot to improve and support customization to suit our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Easy of use - in generate load like HTTP requests, and processing/analyzing the responses. No coding is necessary at the basic level, just need to understand load testing and the infrastructure being tested.
    • Automatic management of things like cookies to help with session state support - so you don't specifically have to worry about it or handle it
    • Lots of testing/configuration options to suit your needs in making the right load generation (sampling requests), and analyzing the results, including any pre and post processing of the results first. Things like the Beanshell/BSF pre/post processors, response assertion, regular expression extractor, XPath extractor, CSV data set config
    • There is a JMeter cloud service called BlazeMeter that I think would be useful for those that need to scale up high load without provisioning their own systems. I've not personally tried it though, but I recently attended a meetup presentation that highlighted nice useful features that BlazeMeter provides. One should evaluate the service if they are considering JMeter and need to expand beyond existing hardware resources.
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Easy and handy UI options to select
    • Good support from documentation
    • Eye-catching results
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Jmeter requires many tweaks with respect to its configuration file and thread properties. users need to edit theses files themselves. There could be some interface where we can edit this fields.
    • Jmeter cannot handle more threads and hangs up when we increase the number of threads. This causes lot of inconvenience. In these situations, user can be notified that such change would be lead to slow performance so that user can do as required. The same appears when we try to view huge files on graph listener.
    • Jmeter should optimize the read and write access to output csv since it acts as overhead to the I/O performance. This affects our test results for the application which we are testing.
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Some graphs remain empty, I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data.
    • Allow user to customize the graph.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    Price, Wiki and user sharing. Having access to the information provided by the developers and other open source providers is key for me. The ability to share information and get answers directly is very important to success in software testing. And the price of this product currently is amazing. Too many companies charge way too much money for products that are far behind in their value and pertinence
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Apache
    The purpose related to performance and load testing through Apache JMeter works fine but the usability of the tool should be improved quite a lot. If someone starts with the Jmeter fresh without prior experience, they need to put more efforts in understanding the tool. The UI is not that great which is the main reason not to give high rating on usability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    I have been using JMeter for the last year. By using this tool, you can make sure the system will work under varied loads. It helps us to simulate real time scenarios by creating required virtual users and make sure the application will work under load. Perform load, stress, and stability testing using JMeter.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    I have used LoadRunner and Silkperformer, and so far Jmeter turns out be the easiest to use of all these. While each of them have their own ROI, Jmeter can be picked by anyone in hours and start testing within a day. While with other tools, we need to get license, install them (takes a while) and setup tests and firewalls, etc.
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    JMeter is a more flexible tool because it gives the possibility to write scripts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Good ROI on improving the performance of the application.
    • Finding issues in the performance.
    • Benchmark the performance results.
    • CON: Need skillset to create and maintain the scripts in Java.
    • Scripts are reusable and it is executed by any user.
    • Need Client and Server setup to execute the scripts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • This tool always yields eye-catching results. It has good support from the documentation. Also, it generates detailed reports which is a very good thing.
    • There is also a record and play feature in LoadComplete which means all applications can be recorded like Applications Servers’ Metric and so on.
    • This tool has a good reporting and record playback due to which I will recommend it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots