Chose Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat vs. NGINX vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
Apache Tomcat vs. NGINX vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Apache Tomcat | N/A | Tomcat is an open-source web server supported by Apache. | N/A | |
NGINX | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A | |
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | N/A | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) for Kubernetes is a Kubernetes-native security platform, equipping organizations to more securely build, deploy, and run cloud-native applications. The solution helps protect containerized Kubernetes workloads in all major clouds and hybrid platforms, including Red Hat OpenShift, IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service, Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS), and Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). | $0 per month |
| Apache Tomcat | NGINX | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apache Tomcat | NGINX | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Considered Multiple Products | ![]() Apache Tomcat | ![]() NGINX | ![]() Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) No answer on this topic |
| Apache Tomcat | NGINX | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
|
| Apache Tomcat | NGINX | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10 | ![]() Apache HTTP Server Score 9.1 out of 10 | Portainer Score 9.0 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10 | ![]() Apache Tomcat Score 8.0 out of 10 | NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10 | ![]() Apache Tomcat Score 8.0 out of 10 | NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Apache Tomcat | NGINX | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 (24 ratings) | 8.9 (50 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 (1 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Usability | 8.0 (3 ratings) | 8.3 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Availability | 6.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Performance | 9.0 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 9.1 (3 ratings) | 8.1 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Configurability | 8.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | 9.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Apache Tomcat | NGINX | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5
| ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5
| ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5
| ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5
| ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5
| ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5 No answers on this topic | ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| Performance | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5 No answers on this topic | ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5
| ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5
| ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| Scalability | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5 No answers on this topic | ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]() Apache
| ![]() F5
| ![]() Red Hat No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots |















