Apollo.io vs. NetApp FAS Storage Arrays

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apollo.io
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Apollo is a sales platform that helps revenue teams find and engage leads, automate outreach, manage deals, and enrich data.
$59
per month per user
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
NetApp's FAS series systems offers a storage array system for enterprises.N/A
Pricing
Apollo.ioNetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Editions & Modules
Basic
$59
per month per user
Professional
$99
per month per user
Organization
$1,188
per year per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apollo.ioNetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details20% discount for annual billing on the Basic and Professional plans.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apollo.ioNetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Features
Apollo.ioNetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Prospecting
Comparison of Prospecting features of Product A and Product B
Apollo.io
8.3
148 Ratings
7% above category average
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
-
Ratings
Advanced search8.4145 Ratings00 Ratings
Identification of new leads8.3147 Ratings00 Ratings
List quality8.0147 Ratings00 Ratings
List upload/download8.6137 Ratings00 Ratings
Ideal customer targeting8.0144 Ratings00 Ratings
Load time/data access8.4145 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Data Standards
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Product A and Product B
Apollo.io
8.2
146 Ratings
5% above category average
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
-
Ratings
Contact information8.3146 Ratings00 Ratings
Company information8.4146 Ratings00 Ratings
Industry information8.0144 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Product A and Product B
Apollo.io
7.9
144 Ratings
6% above category average
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
-
Ratings
Lead qualification process7.7133 Ratings00 Ratings
Smart lists and recommendations7.7132 Ratings00 Ratings
Salesforce integration8.782 Ratings00 Ratings
Company/business profiles8.0139 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and reminders7.6121 Ratings00 Ratings
Data hygiene7.6138 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic data refresh7.7133 Ratings00 Ratings
Tags7.7114 Ratings00 Ratings
Filters and segmentation8.3137 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Email Features
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Product A and Product B
Apollo.io
7.7
130 Ratings
3% above category average
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
-
Ratings
Sales email templates7.5129 Ratings00 Ratings
Append emails to records7.8120 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apollo.ioNetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Small Businesses
Lead411
Lead411
Score 8.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Lead411
Lead411
Score 8.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.9 out of 10
NetApp AFF A-Series
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apollo.ioNetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(163 ratings)
10.0
(15 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(134 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(6 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.5
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apollo.ioNetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Likelihood to Recommend
Apollo.io
I've had an overall great experience with Apollo.io. It allows me to reach out to my ideal customer profile at scale while being able to customise my messaging and workflow. It's also extremely easy to keep track of which leads are warm, not interested and ones to nurture. I also find it extremely useful for lead sourcing - There's a lot of filters I can use to make my list as granular as possible.
Read full review
NetApp
It is very easy to use with NFS. Creating new volumes and mounting to servers such as ESXi or Linux is a breeze. It does also support CIFS but it is far less intuitive and requires much more effort. Replicated data is also very simple and robust in the form of SnapVaults or SnapMirrors. This data is either immediately or periodically replicated to a peer FAS in the cluster for retention.
Read full review
Pros
Apollo.io
  • Sequencing automated email campaigns for outbound prospecting (BD Function).
  • Integrating with Sales Navigator to help me find emails/phone #' numbers/"add to sequence" while prospecting. It's easy and seamless to find & then load contacts into Cadences.
  • Integration with Salesforce is a huge plus. Allows me to not worry about logging anything, but the executive team can see my activity & what is going on (emails going out, responses I get, etc.).
  • The analytics on the outreach data is always helpful as well (open rates, click rates, etc.).
Read full review
NetApp
  • The selling point for NetApp FAS is the application and data protection integration capabilities they provide.
  • We have been able to use NetApp FAS in a variety of use cases with a standard set of management tools.
  • NetApp FAS has evolved over the years from just NAS to also include block protocols. At this time they support almost all industry standard protocols.
Read full review
Cons
Apollo.io
  • Credit usage is not always clear, we've done actions and then been surprised by the credit usage, so having more clarity on this BEFORE the credits are used up would be great.
  • LinkedIn steps are not ideal, there's no automation and does nothing to speed up or help with that step, this really is an email platform, not for social media.
Read full review
NetApp
  • Deduplication job runs at certain times and creates a large CPU overhead for the system
  • Management of a volumes, disk groups, LUNs, etc. is a burden to manage and is not efficient with storage capacity
  • Upgrades are complicated and not "non-disruptive"
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apollo.io
Generally quite a reliable tool with decent data quality/availability. Pricing works well for our team and our use case
Read full review
NetApp
It just works! We've used NetApp FAS Storage Arrays systems since 2011 and have had fantastic results, in particular since 2016 as performance has drastically improved. Tools are great/user friendly, command line capabilities are very strong ... it is simply very effective at what it does!
Read full review
Usability
Apollo.io
It is easy to use. The UI has enough options to learn, with advanced documentation and support. The customer service is quick to respond and assists with information in real time. The UI has different segments for each feature which makes it easy to use.
Settings are easy to change as per preferred requirements
Read full review
NetApp
It does have a really nice and easy to use web interface to do pretty much anything you need with it. It was very simple to configure our volumes and luns and connect them to our VMWare environment using the interface. It has options to rename, shrink, grow, and other things with our luns and volumes. It was nice and easy to read graphs to see where you stand on your storage usage at a glance.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apollo.io
The team wants to solve probelms, but we are finding that they don't know how to solve the more technical issues quickly. I suspect that they don't have a mature process for escalations, and they don't have a usable knowledge base article repository. They seems to push emails around to let us know that people are working on the issues to find solutions, but this takes weeks and oftentimes still leaves us without a resolution.
Read full review
NetApp
NetApp support in Brazil is managed by its partners. We know in other countries, such as the US and NO, they have support directly from Netapp. We have a very good NetApp partner working with us since the beginning, on both the implementation and daily support. Very few cases needed to be escalated to NetApp support, most of the cases are handled and satisfyingly closed by the partner.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Apollo.io
No answers on this topic
NetApp
Our initial deployment was handled by pro services. Most later deployments were handled in-house. All went very smoothly. Documentation made it relatively easy to set up new systems which allowed us to do it in-house. When using pro services they were professional and comprehensive.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apollo.io
Apollo.io has all features of prospecting, outreach automation including email sequences, campaign tracking, lead scoring, and analytics in one interface which enables sales persons to manage their entire sales funnel without having any other extra tool. Another benefit is for pricing related which has been understand from our management team.
Read full review
NetApp
NetApp stacked nicely and gave enterprise-level usability for snapshot-based backups. Our previous RPO was several hours. It was selected prior to me arriving at the company, but It was selected for the hardware refreshes due to its compatibility with several other vendors, like CommVault and VMware.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apollo.io
  • It provides more opportunities to gather more clients.
  • It gives more results and better results in targeting our sales.
  • It is a more effective way to provide information to a large number of potential clients about the events/ projects the company is offering.
Read full review
NetApp
  • The speed of file recovery is the biggest positive impact. Recovering from a ransomware attack in minutes is something you can certainly brag about.
  • Integration with products like Exchange and SQL can certainly speed up normal day to day processes. Not just in backup recovery situations either.
  • Redundant paths make migrations and updates very easy with no downtime.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Apollo.io Screenshots

Screenshot of people, appearing in ApolloScreenshot of Apollo's data enrichment dashboardScreenshot of a view of unified customer dataScreenshot of Apollo's AI-assisted meetings