TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Appgate SDP

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AAppGate SDP (software-defined perimeter) from Cyxtera Technologies headquartered in Addison is a zero trust network security product.N/A

    Cisco Meraki vMX

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ACisco's Meraki Virtual MX (vMX) is a virtual instance of a Meraki security & SD-WAN appliance, dedicated specifically to providing the simple configuration benefits of site-to-site Auto VPN for customers running or migrating IT services to an Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure Virtual Private Cloud (VPC).N/A
    Pricing
    Appgate SDPCisco Meraki vMX
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Appgate SDPCisco Meraki vMX
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Appgate SDPCisco Meraki vMX
    Considered Both Products
    Appgate
    No answer on this topic
    Cisco
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    11 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    Appgate SDPCisco Meraki vMX
    Virtual Private Network
    Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of Appgate SDP and Cisco Meraki vMX
    Feature
    Appgate SDP
    -
    Ratings
    Cisco Meraki vMX
    8.8
    9 Ratings
    1% below category average
    AES 256-bit Encryption00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    Kill Switch00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Multi-Platform Support00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Split Tunneling00 Ratings9.57 Ratings
    IP Address Masking00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    No-Logs Policy00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Multiple Server Locations00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Automatic Wi-Fi Protection00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Simultaneous Connections00 Ratings8.68 Ratings
    Customer Support Services00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Appgate SDPCisco Meraki vMX
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Forescout Vistaro Platform
    Score6.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Appgate SDPCisco Meraki vMX
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.1
    (12 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (12 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Appgate SDPCisco Meraki vMX
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Appgate
    It is best suited for larger companies with lots of remote workers that need complex access management. We've barely scratched the surface on what Appgate can do via its API.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    I think for us in our deployment model where it spoke to the hub, it certainly makes ideal sense. I would probably say with anyone that's signed in Azure or a cloud platform, obviously VMX appliance may not be suited. Anyone on Old Legacy MPLS may struggle to see a purpose for SD-WAN overlay of the top. But I think if you really want to introduce network communications that are low cost effective, solid in terms of availability and performance, a Meraki sdwan solution with the VMX appliance in the cloud is ideal.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Appgate
    • Software-Defined perimeter
    • Hide resources to non-authorized/authenticated users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • It handles load really well.
    • It brings simplification to the whole piece of networking network, so it makes it simple for us to diagnose and troubleshoot issues put in place as changes.
    • It has pretty good site to site firewall control.
    • It works well in Azure, so it ticks all our boxes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Appgate
    • Live logging in the client. Currently you have to "download" the logs into a zip file and then open that zipfile to look at the logs. There's no logfile to tail or watch.
    • Load balancing between controllers could be better. Currently relies on round robin DNS and sometimes a browser will pick a different IP than previous and you'll get a big "LOST CONNECTION TO CONTROLLER" message.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Client VPN: Cisco Meraki vMX in general needs to implement multiple VPN profiles/ group policies for client VPN
    • Alerts: Cisco Meraki vMX in general should be more consistent in sending alerts. We should receive alarms instantly.
    • Event logs: More in-depth event logs for all Meraki products, such as system crashes, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Appgate
    The company has been supportive overall of our needs and desired features. I have not personally called the support services, but I've heard no direct complaints either.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Appgate
    The existing system was FortiGate. The management of the system was a hassle. Because IT personnel had to manually create VPN accounts, user passwords were known to who created them and the end user did not have a way to change them. This created a security issue in the event an IT engineer left the company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Cisco Meraki vMX is great for small to medium businesses. It is easy to use with little out-of-the-box configuration. There is an easier learning curve on the Cisco Meraki vMX than on the SonicWall devices. We went with the Cisco Meraki vMX because we had the physical appliances already in place and the virtual appliance tied into our system seamlessly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Appgate
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    This question is hard. A chain of retail or gas stations hypothetically that have simple networks in nature would flourish and scale quite well with Meraki. A chain of banks or something more complex that has more complex requirements doesn't scale very well or at least presents many caveats. Routing has always been a big setup with Meraki but I've always managed to 'get by'.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Appgate
    • We are achieving our goals with this tool by hiding resources behind it.
    • It is a new model that requires a different thought process for many in network operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Standardizing: We can use the same "template" setup for multiple customers
    • Management: Easy to manage along with the rest of the Meraki products
    • Stability: Using Cisco Meraki vMX instead of VNGs in Azure provides better stability with auto-VPN between the Cisco Meraki vMX and other networks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots