TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Appian vs. Claris FileMaker vs. Office Server Document Converter

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Appian

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AAppian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment.

    $0

    Claris FileMaker

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AClaris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.

    $21

    per month per user

    Office Server Document Converter

    N/AN/AOffice Server Document Converter (OSDC) is a server-side conversion library designed by Antenna House for Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint and RTF documents. It is used to convert documents to PDF, SVG, TIFF, JPEG, PNG, TIFF, INX, XPS files with high-precision conversions, even in environments where Microsoft Office and Adobe software are not installed. OSDC supports .NET, COM, Java, and C/C++ as standard application interfaces. Additionally, the system can create thumbnails, tagged PDF, and…

    $1,080

    per year

    Pricing
    AppianClaris FileMakerOffice Server Document Converter
    Editions & Modules
    Appian Community Edition
    $0
    Application - Input-Only
    $2
    per month per user
    Application - Infrequent
    $9
    per month per user
    Application - Standard
    $75
    per month per user
    Platform
    Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
    minimum 100 users, no maximum
    Unlimited
    Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
    unlimited
    Platform Subscription
    $21
    per month per user
    Individual desktop license
    $594
    one-time fee
    OSDC Docx2HTML - Non-Poduction - Annual
    $370
    per year
    OSDC Standard - Non-Poduction - Annual
    $540
    per year
    OSDC Docx2HTML - Non-Poduction - Perpetual
    $700
    one-time fee
    OSDC Docx2HTML - Server - Annual
    $750
    per year
    OSDC Web Interface - Annual
    $750
    per year
    OSDC Plus - Non-Poduction - Annual
    $810
    per year
    OSDC Standard - Non-Poduction - Perpetual
    $1,000
    one-time fee
    OSDC Standard - Server - Annual
    $1,080
    per year
    OSDC Docx2HTML - Server - Perpetual
    $1,400
    one-time fee
    OSDC Web Interface - Perpetual
    $1,400
    one-time fee
    OSDC Plus - Non-Poduction - Perpetual
    $1,500
    one-time fee
    OSDC Plus- Server - Annual
    $1,620
    per year
    OSDC Standard - Server - Perpetual
    $2,000
    one-time fee
    OSDC Intergrated - Server - Annual
    $2,130
    per year
    OSDC Plus - Server - Perpetual
    $3,000
    one-time fee
    OSDC Intergrated - Server - Perpetual
    $3,960
    one-time fee
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AppianClaris FileMakerOffice Server Document Converter
    Free Trial
    YesNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details$1080- is the starting price for a Standard 1-year full production license for a server.(Maintenance included) The software can also be purchased outright with a 1-time payment of $2000 (12-month Maintenance included) Non-production/ Non-Server License versions are available at discounted prices. Premium features including upgraded conversion abilities (CGM inputs & HTML/INX/XPS outputs) and a Web Interface are available with additional prices. *Prices are per license, and there is no limit on the number of users per license.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AppianClaris FileMakerOffice Server Document Converter
    Considered Multiple Products
    Appian
    No answer on this topic
    Claris
    No answer on this topic
    Antenna House
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    38 Answers
    93%
    Would buy again
    13 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    32 Answers
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    37 Answers
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    96%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    25 Answers
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    30 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AppianClaris FileMakerOffice Server Document Converter
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Appian and Claris FileMaker and Office Server Document Converter
    Feature
    Appian
    8.1
    9 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Claris FileMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Office Server Document Converter
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards8.29 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports8.59 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports7.69 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of Appian and Claris FileMaker and Office Server Document Converter
    Feature
    Appian
    7.4
    9 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Claris FileMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Office Server Document Converter
    -
    Ratings
    Process designer7.99 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process simulation6.49 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business rules engine6.49 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    SOA support8.29 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process player7.39 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form builder7.69 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model execution8.59 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Low-Code Development
    Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Appian and Claris FileMaker and Office Server Document Converter
    Feature
    Appian
    -
    Ratings
    Claris FileMaker
    7.9
    4 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Office Server Document Converter
    -
    Ratings
    Visual Modeling00 Ratings8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings3.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Security00 Ratings9.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform User Management00 Ratings7.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reusability00 Ratings8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Scalability00 Ratings9.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AppianClaris FileMakerOffice Server Document Converter
    Small Businesses
    Bizagi
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Zoho Creator
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Syncfusion Essential Studio
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    AppSheet
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Progress Telerik
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    Oracle APEX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Progress Telerik
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AppianClaris FileMakerOffice Server Document Converter
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.4
    (139 ratings)
    8.0
    (51 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.5
    (19 ratings)
    5.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.7
    (95 ratings)
    8.8
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.4
    (118 ratings)
    1.0
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    1.0
    (5 ratings)
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AppianClaris FileMakerOffice Server Document Converter
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Appian
    Appian works great for automating manual processes and integrating multiple systems through its toolset. It gives great flexibility for establishing rules for approvals, routings, escalations, and the like. Because of the low code toolset, it's very easy to deploy and make changes as needed as processes evolve and as the organization learns to utilize the system better. Minimal maintenance is required to support the applications build on the platform. Some of the automated testing integration with tools like Jenkins is limited so that may be an issue for some.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    If your company is really small, I can understand the need for a product like this. However, I would go for MS Access... FileMaker Pro can not be integrated with other systems (like MS Access can at least be handled by C# for instance, and can be integrated with MS Excel or even SQL server). I'm really not sure in what scenario one would choose for FileMaker Pro. If your application or company grows bigger, you're going to have a problem to move to another environment. Also, the fact that only one person can work with the backend at any given time is a problem in a somewhat larger company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Appian
    • Allows at a glance workflow documentation which assists in the need we have for information readiation.
    • Drag and drop interface for workflow development greatly speeds our apps time to market.
    • Using the advanced features of Appian, we are able to create working sites in a fraction of the time it would take to do so using "traditional" development.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
    • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
    • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
    • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Appian
    • Search issues when type ahead and database search are used in the same field.
    • Buttons implementation where user is require[d] to click on the button description - if clicks on the button outside that text - button will not work.
    • Problems with using certain off-the-shelf performance tools like WebLoad or Neoload. That is because of different dynamic variables being used internally in Appian - which these tools are unable to correlate. We are still investigating using other tools like Jmeter to overcome dynamic correlation problem for performance testing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    • Developer features need to be beefed up - namely adding the ability to search code for a phrase or keyword and the ability to do the same in the "relationship graph" in the database.
    • Add ability for users to edit the same table record at the same time by version control.
    • Allow Filemaker Server to use more than 1 core; currently multi-processing is not supported and it can be tricky to find just the right server to support the application you've built to the fullest capacity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    Appian
    We recently renewed our license with Appian. We are convinced that its flexibility, relative ease of use, the support they provide, there mobile advancements and their general willingness and desire to see us succeed all contributed to our reason to renew our agreement with Appian
    Read full review
    Claris
    It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Appian
    Appian is a low code environment, because of this, a very good visual interface is required. Appian is providing a feature-rich dashboard [that] we can use for building the dashboards and other interfaces. Appian also provides patches and releases to enhance these features. A developer can start off development just by going through a basic course from the Appian learning community.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Appian
    No answers on this topic
    Claris
    mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Appian
    No answers on this topic
    Claris
    for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Appian
    Appian is one of the leading low code business automation platforms that support RPA, decision rules, case management, workflow automation, and machine learning all in a single bundle. But it is also harder to implement and replace the traditional business process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    Appian
    As analyst I participated in a developer boot camp. At times it was hard to keep up but most of the time it made sense. Trainer took the time to explain and slowed pace down to answer questions etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Appian
    Very boring; hard to get through quickly, but rather effective in demonstrating the use of the platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    No answers on this topic
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Appian
    It was really seamless. SaaS in the true definition of the word. We logged on and started using the product. Very easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Appian
    Appian has enormously transformed and keeps on updating the product every quarter to meet the latest needs of the world with new innovations & technologies being integrated within the platform. What gives more pleasure than a product that keeps on continuous[ly] improv[ing]?
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    FileMaker is still the quickest way to go from zero to having a minimum viable working solution. Simple solutions can be built in as little as a afternoon of development. It is the only tool I am aware of which allows tech savy end users with domain knowledge to build bespoke apps for their businesses without undertaking professional software development training.
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Appian
    No answers on this topic
    Claris
    it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Appian
    • I believe it has negatively impacted our release dates. There may have been a misunderstanding as to the learning curve, even though it is "low code."
    • The look and feel of the applications created using Appian have uniformity and it's easier to have "reuse" between applications.
    • There is less developer control when it comes to features. I think this mainly has to do with the amount of plugins available. I would think there should be many more available plugins. But again, our use case is probably different than most others.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Claris
    • We are a more agile company because of FileMaker. A few of us who are tech-savvy enough to manage the database (but are not professional developers) can make needed adjustments to our database without having to employ an in-house developer or contract with a 3rd party. As our business processes evolve and change, it's easy to update the database to accommodate those changes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Antenna House
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots

    Appian Screenshots

    Screenshot of Low-Code DevelopmentScreenshot of Business Process Management SuiteScreenshot of Dynamic Case ManagementScreenshot of Mobile App DevelopmentScreenshot of Appian RPA with Blue Prism

    Office Server Document Converter Screenshots

    Product screenshot