Aptean Made2Manage ERP is an enterprise resource planning software solution. It is built specifically for small and mid-sized manufacturers. It includes dynamic, to-order environments such as make-to-order, engineer-to-order, assemble-to-order, and mixed mode operations.
N/A
IFS Applications
Score7.6 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Pricing
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
IFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
IFS Applications
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
IFS Applications
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.0
2 Ratings
153% below category average
IFS Applications
4.7
3 Ratings
46% below category average
Pay calculation
1.02 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
1.02 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Direct deposit files
1.02 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.0
2 Ratings
153% below category average
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
API for custom integration
1.02 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Plug-ins
1.01 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.5
4 Ratings
83% below category average
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Single sign-on capability
5.03 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
2.04 Ratings
9.75 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.7
4 Ratings
95% below category average
IFS Applications
8.8
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Dashboards
2.04 Ratings
8.55 Ratings
Standard reports
3.04 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Custom reports
3.04 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
4.9
5 Ratings
45% below category average
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Accounts payable
6.05 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Accounts receivable
5.05 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Global Financial Support
5.02 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
5.03 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
5.03 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
3.03 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.03 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.8
4 Ratings
126% below category average
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Inventory tracking
1.04 Ratings
9.25 Ratings
Automatic reordering
2.01 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Location management
2.03 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.9
5 Ratings
93% below category average
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Pricing
4.05 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Order entry
4.04 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
Credit card processing
2.02 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
4.04 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Order Orchestration
2.01 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
5.3
3 Ratings
35% below category average
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
Billing Management
6.03 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
5.03 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.02 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
5.02 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
Period Close
7.02 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.3
2 Ratings
79% below category average
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.02 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Project Costing
3.02 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
3.02 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
3.02 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
4.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
3.02 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.8
1 Ratings
119% below category average
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
1.01 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.3
1 Ratings
106% below category average
IFS Applications
9.3
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
1.01 Ratings
9.32 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.9
2 Ratings
84% below category average
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
4.02 Ratings
9.33 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.02 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Supplier Management
1.01 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.6
1 Ratings
89% below category average
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Risk Repository
3.01 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Control Management
4.01 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
3.01 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Issue Detection
1.01 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.4
2 Ratings
69% below category average
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
5.01 Ratings
8.32 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
5.01 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
3.02 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.6
2 Ratings
97% below category average
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Production Process Design
2.01 Ratings
9.33 Ratings
Production Management
4.02 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Configuration Management
2.02 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Work Execution
3.02 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
4.02 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.0
3 Ratings
114% below category average
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Forecasting
1.02 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Inventory Planning
2.03 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
2.02 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and IFS Applications
For parts sales, M2M is not a good program. There are too many glitches that happen between the sales order process and the shipping process. At the same time, we have to work with outside vendors to make certain functions work in the program. Or it has to work outside the program and communicate back to the main software. Way too clunky.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I am not in the decision making group any more for this product. When I was, I along with many other managers, voted to go with a competitive product software vs re-subscribing to Aptean for this product. We were convinced by certain parties at our work that the new product was head and shoulders above the old product. While they freshened up a few things and there was an increase in some functionality areas, it was still tired.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This software is not user-friendly nor easy to train on. I train people for various departments and had argued for the company to go with another company. I was not alone. When the time came for us to do an upgrade (necessitated by the advent of Windows 10 compatibility issues), a number of managers at our organization wanted to seek out other vendors due to the difficulty in training people to use the software. Then have to deal with so many of the user issues and lack of functionality created by the need for using an outside software programmer to bring in software that interpreted what M2M was doing and then translate it back into the program so that we had an end-user solution. This software should be robust enough to do it all. It is not. I hate to be so negative about it but anyone that has spent as many years using this software as I have should find something good to say about the platform and I struggle to do that. I had asked for the warranty section that would tie into the return authorization process. I was told it would happen. It didn't. Bad karma.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I go back to the warranty segment of the program to help track expenses that were generated by returns and zero-dollar sales orders to resolve customer issues. I feel like I was lied to by the company. They said they would have it in there on the new release. They told the purchasing manager it would be on the new release. The purchasing manager assured me it would be on there. They even showed 'warranty loading' on the screen when you signed in. However, there was no additional component of the return material authorization process for warranty adaptation. I even challenged our upload team about it and they had no answer. It does a few functions well but in my personal experience, buy something else.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
The actual implementation was no worse or better than other software updates. There were days of pain and additional training helped overcome a lot of the learning curve associated with that. However, that training came from our own internal staff vs anyone from Aptean.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
I came on board after M2M was implemented so I'm not sure how it has changed from previous software. However, I do know it has the ability to grow with the company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info