Archibus by Eptura vs. ServiceNow Enterprise Asset Management

Archibus is well suited for organizations requiring heavy reporting functions, and that have complex processes for managing moves and space chargebacks. It is less well suited for organizations that require input from multiple users (such as doing an employee seating survey).

Incentivized

Companies with a lot of devices to keep track of. Maintaining an inventory in something on prem and not sturctured could lead to a mess of data. It is better to have it in the cloud with drop down choices to pick up. That way people can't write anything they want and you wind up with no consistency.

Incentivized

• Detail uploads of floor plans
• Web based portal
• Customizable service

Incentivized

• Lease Management's data structure may need more flexibility to adopt different business needs.
• Capital Project Management need simpler interfaces and workflows to improve end user experience.

Incentivized

User perspective it is simple through a web portal that shows all spaces and buildings. But as an administrator it was quite a bit of work to set up. And by extension updating is also a lot of work

Incentivized

Archibus compares well with other IWMS software when it comes to integrating with BIM models and reporting capabilities. I selected Archibus as it has all the tools and processes needed to manage space and moves, with the intention to expand to other modules like Lease Administration and Asset Management. The constant upgrades to Archibus also helps to keep the software up-to-date with other third party products such as Revit.

Incentivized

It does a pretty good job when compared to CounterACT by Forescout. To be honest the inventory our CounterACT servers collect on every device on the network is vast compared to what is in SNOW. CounterACT has a module for SNOW and can share its CMDB. We hope to utilize in the future.

Incentivized

• Met our business objectives
• Positive ROI

Incentivized