Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Armor is a cloud and mobile security solution. The vendor’s value proposition is that this solution was purpose-built to deliver the highest level of defense and control for an organization’s critical data, no matter where it’s hosted. The vendor says they are so confident in the ability of their solution to protect an organization’s data that they back it with their Cyber Warranty Guarantee.N/A
Cloudflare One (SASE)
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflare One is a single-vendor secure access service edge (SASE) platform that converges security and networking services into a unified, global connectivity cloud. Cloudflare One connects and protects an organization's workforce, AI agents, and infrastructure.N/A
Invicti
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Invicti enables organizations in every industry to continuously scan and secure all of their web applications and APIs. Invicti provides a comprehensive view of an organization’s entire web application portfolio, and automation and integrations enable customers to achieve broad coverage of thousands of applications. Invicti is headquartered in Austin, Texas, and serves more than 3,500 organizations of all sizes all over the world.N/A
Pricing
ArmorCloudflare One (SASE)Invicti
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ArmorCloudflare One (SASE)Invicti
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ArmorCloudflare One (SASE)Invicti
Features
ArmorCloudflare One (SASE)Invicti
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Armor
-
Ratings
Cloudflare One (SASE)
10.0
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Invicti
-
Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Armor
-
Ratings
Cloudflare One (SASE)
10.0
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Invicti
-
Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Armor
-
Ratings
Cloudflare One (SASE)
9.0
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Invicti
-
Ratings
Network Analytics00 Ratings5.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Armor
-
Ratings
Cloudflare One (SASE)
9.3
2 Ratings
7% above category average
Invicti
-
Ratings
Continuous Verification00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin Access Control00 Ratings8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings9.42 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ArmorCloudflare One (SASE)Invicti
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.5 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.5 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ArmorCloudflare One (SASE)Invicti
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(13 ratings)
10.0
(6 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.8
(13 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ArmorCloudflare One (SASE)Invicti
Likelihood to Recommend
Armor
Armor gives you what you need to be successful regardless of technical ability. If you can maintain the systems yourself, you are definitely ahead of the game with their service. If you're not prepared to configure and maintain the systems, they do a pretty good job of getting it set up during the onboarding process so that you don't need to dig into the technical guts too much. If you find yourself in over your head, their support staff can handle it for you in most cases.
Read full review
Cloudflare
I wanted to securely connect to my servers without getting tracked by malicious attackers, even though I was on public Wi-Fi. Security was my top priority, and I also wanted a setup that was easy and quick to start and provided great network performance. Cloudflare's Zero trust matches my criteria for becoming my first choice.
Read full review
Invicti Security
Netsparker is very thorough but can take a very long time to scan a web application. It can also take a long time to learn and configure. Its thoroughness is a very good part of the product but if the application does [not] need this thoroughness it is probably a waste of time to run Netsparker on the website.
Read full review
Pros
Armor
  • Security - we have requirements met right out of the box and the implementation of new resources is done with security in mind.
  • Speed - We can scale resources easy and the infrastructure is fast and efficient.
  • Responsiveness - Support tickets are handled very fast with almost immediate solutions.
Read full review
Cloudflare
  • Block access to known bad, risky, or unwanted destinations at the DNS or HTTP level.
  • Excellent protection for remote users.
  • Best in class browser isolation techniques.
Read full review
Invicti Security
  • NetSparker has excellent customer service. When our team had to learn to use it for the first time, we had to communicate directly with NetSparker consultants.
  • NetSparker is very user-friendly. It's UI is organized and keeps all the different scans we have set-up in a very clean visual.
  • Netsparker has a selection of workflows and integration tools that make it useful for keeping all of my teammates on the same page.
Read full review
Cons
Armor
  • Authentication and access against the secure messaging portal is overkill when the response I'm logging in to see merely says, "yes, we have your message. An agent will respond shortly". There should be an option to receive updates like this through email.
  • The online portal that allows us to clone servers is very slow to respond. More than once I've spun up an additional server due to the lack of visual feedback on the initial request.
  • The web application firewall does not seem to be sophisticated enough to differentiate between logged in administrators and end users. We use a CMS system which allows admins to create scripts. These often get barred by the WAF even though they are not malicious.
Read full review
Cloudflare
  • Cloudflare still need to improve CASB direction to complete set of SASE tools.
  • More integrations with the third-party agents to check device posture in the Zero Trust framework.
  • More granularity in firewall rules for full replacement of on-premise solutions.
Read full review
Invicti Security
  • Netsparker Cloud is expensive and restricts the number of website URLs that you are allowed to scan. This restricts us from scanning all of the websites that we create and only allows us to scan a small subset of number of the website we produce.
  • Netsparker is difficult to configure and I often need to open a ticket with support to figure out how to use the product. I have been vulnerability testing websites for over 10 years and I still don't think I really know how to use Netsparker.
  • Netsparker can take a very long time to complete a scan due to the number of items it can scan for. Be certain to reduce the technologies that your scan will be looking at. Also, expect a large website to possibly take over two days to complete. Not something you really want to have happen on a developer checking on some source code.
Read full review
Usability
Armor
No answers on this topic
Cloudflare
Within a few hours, new engineers are trained in basic tasks and are quite happy they are able to resolve issues independently. After SSO is configured, onboarding is as simple as signing into m365 via a web browser popup.
Read full review
Invicti Security
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Armor
Approximately 50% of all messages we receive are automated. Either that an agent will be assigned, has been assigned, or a ticket is closed. I'd like to see more 'real' interaction, and less box ticking, though I appreciate process has to be followed. That's the one point off. Everything else is very good.
Read full review
Cloudflare
Good chat support from the portal for basic questions and minor issues. The enterprise support line is provided as well.
Read full review
Invicti Security
NetSparker support is amazing. When first introducing this software to the team, there was a lot of communication going on between Netsparker consultants and our team. They have answered our questions very efficiently and have had consultants come to our department for training. They are open to suggestions for improvements and enhancements as well.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Armor
No answers on this topic
Cloudflare
Cloudflare was both the most feature-rich and cost-effective of comparisons. Presales engagement understood our challenges and was keen to solve them.
Read full review
Invicti Security
I currently use OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite Professional and Veracode Dynamic Scan. ZAP is very easy to use and the web developers use it regularly. Burp Suite is very customizable as is Netsparker but usually take much less time to scan a website. Both of these tools are programmable and allow me to add special items to a scan when I need it. They are also much better documented. Veracode also has a static code analysis tool that we use much more often then the dynamic analysis tool but we do use both parts of Veracode.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Armor
No answers on this topic
Cloudflare
  • The cost of Cloudflare Zero trust is much lower, hence reducing spending on infrastructure security.
  • The Network performance is improved thanks to Warp protocol.
  • Requires less maintenance and hence saves time.
Read full review
Invicti Security
  • NetSparker has saved the team a lot of time since the scans quicker than our older software.
  • NetSparker has been costing the company a lot compared to previous security software.
  • Netsparker has helped improved our overall business objectives by finding an efficient and collaborative way to run scans on our systems.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Invicti Screenshots

Screenshot of Vulnerability detectionScreenshot of Netsparker dashboardScreenshot of Integrations/automationScreenshot of Scan and protect your entire asset library in one place