TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Assembla vs. Bitbucket Server (discontinued)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Assembla

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AAssembla provides a cloud-based source code management (SCM) Platform that covers Perforce, Apache Subversion (SVN), and Git. Their managed cloud hosting solutions are designed for both small and enterprise software development teams. They offer a turn-key cloud hosting solution that covers both Perforce and infrastructure management. This includes design and managed dedicated server network. And Assembla's Subversion Enterprise offers Assembla Cloud features on a dedicated, high-performance…

    $19

    per month per user

    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)

    Score4 out of 10
    N/ABitbucket Server (formerly Stash) from Atlassian was a self-hosted source code management solution. The product is no longer available for sale, and support for existing licenses ended in 2024.N/A
    Pricing
    AssemblaBitbucket Server (discontinued)
    Editions & Modules
    Subversion Cloud
    $19
    per month per user
    Perforce Cloud
    $52.25
    per month (12 month term) per user
    Perforce Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Subversion Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AssemblaBitbucket Server (discontinued)
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    AssemblaBitbucket Server (discontinued)
    Small Businesses
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AssemblaBitbucket Server (discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    8.9
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AssemblaBitbucket Server (discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Idera, Inc.
    Assembla works well when you are working with multiple groups or entities. We dealt with different time zones, different levels of involvement with the projects, etc so this allows for us to have responses back in a quicker fashion. It also helps us clue in the appropriate people and rely less on following multiple email chains
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Bitbucket Server would be good to use if you are not extremely reliant on the availability of your code at any given moment. If you have other systems relying on the up status of Bitbucket Server that can cause problems if unable to reach it -- you might consider going with a different product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Idera, Inc.
    • Assembla assists in the workload balancing of our programmers.
    • We are able to use Assembla to manage sprints and sprint planning in our agile format.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Pull requests / code reviews are simple but effective - it's easy to discuss the changes and enforce quality gates (through integration with Bamboo)
    • The access control model is fairly granular, with per-branch and per-action permission configuration options
    • There are various plugins available to extend functionality, such as SonarQube
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Idera, Inc.
    • The ability to export the tasks or run metrics on them.
    • Mobile ability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) should be evaluated for implementation based on the capacity of the environment ownership and support.
    • Insights and analytics reports are basic.
    • Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) as part of Atlassian tools has some restrictions for centralized user management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Idera, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    Because we're so locked in, it's likely we'll be using Bitbucket Server for a while, unfortunately.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Idera, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    The usability of its interface is pretty straight forward when it comes to creating projects and repositories, but when you have to dive into finer grained portions of the UI things can get tricky. If you are used to using tools like GitHub or Gitlab -- Bitbucket is just different enough to be a bother.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Idera, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    Never really needed any support as the application is very easy to set up and maintain. Any questions we had were well documented in their online documentation, and community forum.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Idera, Inc.
    We selected Assembla because the ticket functionality worked well with our agile planning format that we use company wide.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Stash was selected before I was at the company, but we're looking at these alternatives and actively considering switching. Stash seems to have all the necessary features we need to make it work, but it doesn't have any bells and whistles or extra special features that we can use to create more advanced integrations with other products like Jenkins or Amazon Web Services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Idera, Inc.
    • We were able to spend less time tracking down the status of projects.
    • We could become more self-sufficient on reviewing prior resolutions to help with current problems.
    • Tasks were responded to quickly because we did not have to email one person, wait for an out of office email and then try someone else. Our task got assigned to the next available person.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Stash has certainly improved the productivity of the team. We no longer have to use Shared Drive on network which is prone to hacks and errors to manage our code.
    • During the process of releases, the release engineering team can pull the latest and approved code from Stash and need not be dependent upon the availability of the developers during their non availability. It improves productivity and fastens the ETA for requests.
    • We have stayed on course for project deadlines since introduction of Stash and helps us achieve the goals of timely completion of projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots