Assembla vs. Crucible

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Assembla
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Assembla provides a cloud-based source code management (SCM) Platform that covers Perforce, Apache Subversion (SVN), and Git. Their managed cloud hosting solutions are designed for both small and enterprise software development teams. They offer a turn-key cloud hosting solution that covers both Perforce and infrastructure management. This includes design and managed dedicated server network. And Assembla's Subversion Enterprise offers Assembla Cloud features on a dedicated, high-performance…
$19
per month per user
Crucible
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Atlasssian Crucible is a peer review tool for finding bugs and defects in version control tools Subversion, Git, Mercurial, CVS, and Perforce.N/A
Pricing
AssemblaCrucible
Editions & Modules
Subversion Cloud
$19
per month per user
Perforce Cloud
$52.25
per month (12 month term) per user
Perforce Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Subversion Enterprise
Custom Pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AssemblaCrucible
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AssemblaCrucible
Best Alternatives
AssemblaCrucible
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.2 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AssemblaCrucible
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(2 ratings)
7.4
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
AssemblaCrucible
Likelihood to Recommend
Idera, Inc.
Assembla works well when you are working with multiple groups or entities. We dealt with different time zones, different levels of involvement with the projects, etc so this allows for us to have responses back in a quicker fashion. It also helps us clue in the appropriate people and rely less on following multiple email chains
Read full review
Atlassian
Crucible is well suited for situations where development teams follow a branch-based merge process, where new features or automation stories are introduced. It allows more seasoned team members to check newer team members' code to ensure standards are followed. It is probably less appropriate for smaller development teams or smaller projects, where code reviews can be less formal.
Read full review
Pros
Idera, Inc.
  • Assembla assists in the workload balancing of our programmers.
  • We are able to use Assembla to manage sprints and sprint planning in our agile format.
Read full review
Atlassian
  • Supports all major source control systems such as SVN and Git.
  • Integration with Jira, Bamboo, Bitbucket, to have a complete end to end development experience.
  • Easy to use UI/UX for reviewing code changes amongst different team members.
Read full review
Cons
Idera, Inc.
  • The ability to export the tasks or run metrics on them.
  • Mobile ability.
Read full review
Atlassian
  • Crucible notifications of changes or updates to the code review are delayed as well as loading more source code is slow.
  • Crucible is formatting could use improvements for viewing customization features. For instance, allowing the user to create a new tab per file to be reviewed would be nice to have.
Read full review
Support Rating
Idera, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
Good support overall being an Atlassian product, with options including free/paid official support and community provided help.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Idera, Inc.
We selected Assembla because the ticket functionality worked well with our agile planning format that we use company wide.
Read full review
Atlassian
Crucible was first on the market and the price is inexpensive. Crucible integrates with Jira Software and Atlassian Fisheye, providing the ability to track defects efficiently. SonarQube compares code to 'best standards' but not 'internal standards' and does not integrate to issue tracking. GitHub offers effective peer review, and has some integration with GitHub issues but costs more.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Idera, Inc.
  • We were able to spend less time tracking down the status of projects.
  • We could become more self-sufficient on reviewing prior resolutions to help with current problems.
  • Tasks were responded to quickly because we did not have to email one person, wait for an out of office email and then try someone else. Our task got assigned to the next available person.
Read full review
Atlassian
  • It has had a large ROI for our team, as it has helped us find issues sooner than we would have had we not reviewed things properly.
Read full review
ScreenShots