TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Atlassian Bamboo

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AAustralian company Atlassian offers Bamboo, a continuous integration server.

    $1,200

    1 remote agent

    AWS CodePipeline

    Score6.6 out of 10
    N/AAWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps users automate release pipelines. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of the release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model a user defines.

    $1

    per active pipeline/per month

    Pricing
    Atlassian BambooAWS CodePipeline
    Editions & Modules
    1 Remote Agent
    $1200
    5 Remote Agents
    $3200
    10 Remote Agents
    $5840
    25 Remote Agents
    $11,600
    100 Remote Agents
    $23,280
    250 Remote Agents
    $58,160
    500 Remote Agents
    $87,280
    1000 Remote Agents
    $133,840
    2000 Remote Agents
    $187,380
    AWS CodePipeline
    $1
    per active pipeline/per month
    Free Tier
    Free
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Atlassian BambooAWS CodePipeline
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Atlassian BambooAWS CodePipeline
    Considered Both Products
    Atlassian
    No answer on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    89%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    71%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    Atlassian BambooAWS CodePipeline
    Small Businesses
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Atlassian BambooAWS CodePipeline
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.4
    (24 ratings)
    9.0
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    9.3
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.8
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.3
    (6 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Atlassian BambooAWS CodePipeline
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Atlassian
    If you value integration over cost, Bamboo is clearly the way to go. It offers tight integration to the rest of the Atlassian suite, and when you need traceability from issue to build, Atlassian is the right way to go. However, if you find yourself needing to save on costs, you may consider taking an approach of rolling your own build system with open source alternatives, such as Jenkins, if you don't [mind] putting in a little extra elbow grease.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    I think AWS CodePipeline is a great tool for anyone wanted automated deployments in a multi-server/container AWS environment. AWS also offers services like Elastic Beanstalk that provide a more managed hosting & deployment experience. CodePipeline is a good middle ground with solid, built-in automation with enough customizability to not lock people into one deployment or architecture philosophy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Atlassian
    • Levels of granularity. Organization has many projects that have many build plans that have many jobs that have many tasks, etc. And branch builds allow source control branches to be built separately.
    • Versatility. I can use bamboo to manage my Java, node, or .NET build plans. I can use it to spin up Windows or Linux build agents, or install it on a Mac to build there as well.
    • Bamboo integrates with other Atlassian products like Bitbucket, Stash, JIRA, etc. If a company commits to the entire Atlassian stack then work can be tracked through the whole development lifecycle which is really useful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • It is reliable and works without errors
    • It integrates well with our repository and all other AWS functions as well as our end database
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Atlassian
    • Extremely hard barrier to entry for non-backend developers
    • Blackbox makes it hard to customize functionality
    • The inability to add features without breaking core functionality
    • No cloud solution
    • Tasks cannot be put in if/else statements
    • No clear right way to form build plans
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Ease of use - things like CircleCI or other tools are a bit easier to learn.
    • Ability to build from more sources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Atlassian
    Bamboo offers solid usability for teams looking for an integrated, scalable CI/CD solution, especially those using Atlassian tools. Its interface is intuitive for existing Atlassian users, and its focus on deployment automation makes it a strong option for continuous delivery. However, its complexity and cost may pose challenges for small teams or those new to CI/CD. Overall, Bamboo’s usability shines in environments where ease of integration and streamlined workflows are prioritized. Still, it may require more effort for teams unfamiliar with its setup or without dedicated resources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    Overall, I give AWS Codepipeline a 9 because it gets the job done and I can't complain much about the web interface as much of the action is taking place behind the scenes on the terminal locally or via Amazon's infrastructure anyway. It would be nicer to have a better flowing and visualizable web interface, however.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Atlassian
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    Our pipeline takes about 30 minutes to run through. Although this time depends on the applications you are using on either end, I feel that it is a reasonable time to make upgrades and updates to our system as it is not an every day push.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Atlassian
    Bamboo is a fairly small product but having said that it was fairly easy to get assistance. Especially for the small to easy things. Anything large or fairly complex was an issue finding detailed answers for. This caused a lot of trial and error on our part to try to find a solution.
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    We didn't need a lot of support with AWS CodePipeline as it was pretty straightforward to configure and use, but where we ran into problems, the AWS community was able to help. AWS support agents were also helpful in resolving some of the minor issues we encountered, which we could not find a solution elsewhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Atlassian
    We selected Bamboo because its capabilities to integrate with other Atlassian products specially Jira Software, Bitbucket and in some useful scenarios with Confluence. Also, we found these pros important for us: great user interface, easily agent deployment, Docker compability, simply to maintain / manage, and straightforwardly integration with different notification platforms
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    CodeCommit and CodeDeploy can be used with CodePipeline so it’s not really fair to stack them against each other as they can be quite the compliment. The same goes for Beanstalk, which is often used as a deployment target in relation to CodePipeline.

    CodePipeline fulfills the CI/CD duty, where the other services do not focus on that specific function. They are supplements, not replacements. CodePipeline will detect the updated code and handle deploying it to the actual instance via Beanstalk.

    Jenkins is open source and not a native AWS service, that is its primary differentiator. Jenkins can also be used as a supplement to CodePipeline.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Atlassian
    • It helped us achieve the Continuous Deployment and Continuous Integration goals for our applications, a huge milestone that saved a lot of time for developers in making the builds and deployments and saved time for QA in running the automated tests.
    • Helped with DevOps: we moved the formal approval from the email to the system and allowed the approver to actually push the button for the production deployments.
    • Biggest positive impact of using Bamboo is that it improved our response time to customers and increased the frequency of our deliveries to them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • CodePipeline has reduced ongoing devops costs for my clients, especially around deployment & testing.
    • CodePipeline has sped up development workflow by making the deployment process automated off git pushes. Deployment takes very little coordination as the system will just trigger based on what is the latest commit in a branch.
    • CodePipeline offered a lot of out-of-the-box functionality that was much simpler to setup than a dedicated CI server. It allowed the deployment process to built and put into production with much less and effort and cost compared to rolling the functionality manually.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots