ATS Mako vs. Recruit CRM
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ATS Mako | N/A | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | ATS Mako is a fully brandable (white-label) applicant tracking system that unifies SMS, an integrated email client, AI candidate ranking, scheduling, and onboarding into one platform — keeping every interaction from first touch to offer letter fast, automated, and measurable. The vendor states their solution is built for staffing firms, recruiting agencies, and multi-location/franchise organizations that need speed and scale without losing their own brand identity. | $149 per month up to 5 users |
Recruit CRM | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | Recruit CRM is an applicant tracking system (ATS) and customer relationship management (CRM) platform for recruitment and staffing agencies. It centralizes candidate, client, job, email, and activity data so recruiters can manage sourcing, outreach, submissions, and placements from one system. Key Capabilities AI assistance: AI agents can parse resumes, prepare candidate shortlists and submissions, draft outreach, and format candidate… | $109 per month per user |
| ATS Mako | Recruit CRM | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Recruit CRM offers publicly listed pricing. Plans are priced per user and billed monthly or annually, with annual billing saving up to 20 percent. A free trial is available so teams can explore the platform before choosing a plan. There are three plans, Pro, Business, and Enterprise, plus Enterprise features such as workflow automation, job multiposting, data enrichment, LinkedIn messaging integration, advanced analytics, and Recruit Craft. Several Enterprise features are included by default on the Enterprise plan. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| ATS Mako | Recruit CRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 14 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 14 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | |
| ATS Mako | Recruit CRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Crelate Score9.1 out of 10 | Vincere Score3.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | CareerSiteBuilder Score10 out of 10 | PCRecruiter Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | JobDiva Score8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| ATS Mako | Recruit CRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.5 |
| ATS Mako | Recruit CRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | ATS Mako Screenshots | Recruit CRM Screenshots |













