Auth0 vs. Opal.dev

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Auth0
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Auth0 is an identity management platform for developers and application teams. It gives users a platform to authenticate and authorize, providing secure access to applications, devices, and users. Auth0 aims to provide the simplicity, extensibility, and expertise to scale and protect any application, for any audience. Integrate Auth0 into any app, written in any language, and any framework.
$23
per month
Opal.dev
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
Opal is a security platform that enables organizations to scale process.N/A
Pricing
Auth0Opal.dev
Editions & Modules
1,000 External Active Users
$23
per month
2,000 External Active Users
$57
per month
5,000 External Active Users
$114
per month
500 External Active Machines
$130
per month
10,000 External Active Users
$228
per month
20,000 External Active Users
$455
per month
50,000 External Active Users
1,138
per month
Over 50,000 External Active Users
Contact for quote
Enterprise
Contact for quote
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Auth0Opal.dev
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Auth0Opal.dev
Features
Auth0Opal.dev
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Auth0
7.5
69 Ratings
0% above category average
Opal.dev
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control8.063 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)8.064 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication8.559 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Auth0Opal.dev
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Auth0
Auth0
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Auth0Opal.dev
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(71 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.7
(17 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.4
(50 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Auth0Opal.dev
Likelihood to Recommend
Okta
Great for user authentication and access priviledge management. We are using it for both our commercial and financial clients and Auth0 meets all the regulations and due diligence required to close deals with these enterprise customers. Given their tiered pricing structure, we don't see a scenario where Auth0 would not be appropriate for the solution it provides.
Read full review
Opal.dev
I am frustrated that my organization chose to adopt Opal for our access management tool. It is extremely difficult to use, due to bugs and basic functionality missing. Engineers are not given write access to production resources, so every change must flow through Opal.
This involves writing an IAM policy by hand for every request, because it is far too difficult to find an existing role in the system, and requests must the narrowly tailored only to allow the exact operation requested. Opal makes this process much more difficult because it lacks basic functionality for end users, such as: -Ability to modify an existing IAM role
-Ability to view existing IAM roles
-Ability to delete duplicate Opal roles
-Lack of IAM role templates
-Poor error messages when attempting JSON policy fails validation
In general, each Opal request takes 5-10 minutes because you need to be very explicit with every API action you are requesting, which then needs to be repeated multiple times because it is very hard to get everything correct the first time, which then requires a new round of reviews. This is partially because AWS IAM roles can be tricky to get right, but Opal provides no functionality to make this easier.
Read full review
Pros
Okta
  • RBAC is simple, straight forward and easy to manage
  • Integrations of Social Login are simple to configure and the Auth0 documentation shows step by step how to configure it
  • Rules/Hooks provide customization to the Auth0 flow, making it a great solution to define how we allow our users to login into our applications
Read full review
Opal.dev
No answers on this topic
Cons
Okta
  • Price point for ALL features can get a bit pricey. But they have a startup plan which helps big time. Developer plans start at $23/mo and do not include all features.
  • Actions, rules, hooks, and email customization are great features, but the UI is a bit tough sometimes, not very responsive to screen size and code editors are cut off in a difficult place to maneuver.
Read full review
Opal.dev
  • Inability to modify an IAM role after creation
  • Inability to use templated IAM roles
  • Inability to see existing IAM roles
  • Inability for users to clean up existing Opal roles
  • Poor ability to search for existing Opal roles
  • Repeated reliability issues - IAM role creation breaks far too often
  • Cryptic error messages when IAM JSON is incorrect
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Okta
For our purposes, Auth0 is still one of the best valued RBAC platforms in the market.
Read full review
Opal.dev
No answers on this topic
Usability
Okta
Overall it is a very good authentication platform. It is very intuitive when someone get used to it . The dashboard is clean and most configurations steps are easy to setup. It handles complex authentication flows in a straightforward way. It is just real time detailed analytics logs could be improved.
Read full review
Opal.dev
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Okta
There isn't a clear method to get a hold of support when trouble arises if you're on their standard plan. You can file a support ticket and they generally are responsive. I've often been able to find similar questions to the questions I've had when it comes to support in their ticket history, however, some have been closed without a satisfactory conclusion for the original poster.
Read full review
Opal.dev
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Okta
We went with Auth0 over Okta due to price concerns and the overall simplicity of Auth0. We chose Auth0 over Amazon Cognito because Cognito has very poor documentation and client library support. Auth0 offers a service that hits the sweet spot for organizations with small development teams and limited finances.
Read full review
Opal.dev
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Okta
  • SAML SSO is a breeze - this alone saves a lot of dev/support hours.
  • We are not worried by hackers and chasing security protocols and standards, I guess about half a day job of a developer.
  • Telling customers we can connect them with what ever they have whether its social / SAML / OIDC put us in flexible position
Read full review
Opal.dev
  • Decreased engineering productivity
Read full review
ScreenShots

Auth0 Screenshots

Screenshot of multi-factor authentication with Auth0Screenshot of Auth0's user interface tools. These help administrators manage user identities including password resets, creating and provisioning, blocking and deleting users.Screenshot of a view of the customer's digital experience; this includes smart recommendations based on previous behavior, an experience tailored specifically to their mobile device, and easy discovery of travel options.Screenshot of the Auth0 Identity Access Management platform, built on AWS. It is designed to deliver a universal authentication and authorization as a service for web, mobile and legacy applications.to 7000+ customers worldwide.Screenshot of Auth0’s Adaptive MFA, which is based on various types of behavioral signals, meaning the MFA step is only presented when deemed risky. This preserves the experience for the majority of users, while maintaining a strong security posture.

Opal.dev Screenshots

Screenshot of Opal.dev