AWS CloudFormation vs. Azure DevOps Server
AWS CloudFormation vs. Azure DevOps Server
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS CloudFormation | N/A | AWS CloudFormation gives developers and systems administrators a way to create and manage a collection of related AWS resources, provisioning and updating them in a predictable fashion. Use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run an application. Users don’t need to figure out the order for provisioning AWS services or the subtleties of making those dependencies work.… | $0 | |
![]() Azure DevOps Server | N/A | Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server. | N/A |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There is no additional charge for using AWS CloudFormation with resource providers in the following namespaces: AWS::*, Alexa::*, and Custom::*. In this case you pay for AWS resources (such as Amazon EC2 instances, Elastic Load Balancing load balancers, etc.) created using AWS CloudFormation as if you created them manually. You only pay for what you use, as you use it; there are no minimum fees and no required upfront commitments. When you use resource providers with AWS CloudFormation outside the namespaces mentioned above, you incur charges per handler operation. Handler operations are create, update, delete, read, or list actions on a resource. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server |
|---|
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration Management |
|
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | HashiCorp Vagrant Score 10.0 out of 10 | GitHub Score 9.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Ansible Score 9.2 out of 10 | GitHub Score 9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Ansible Score 9.2 out of 10 | Perforce P4 Score 7.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 (7 ratings) | 9.0 (48 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Usability | 8.0 (2 ratings) | 6.0 (4 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.4 (10 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (2 ratings) |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Microsoft
|
| Pros | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Microsoft
|
| Cons | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Microsoft
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | ![]() Microsoft
|
| Usability | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Microsoft
|
| Support Rating | ![]() Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | ![]() Microsoft
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | ![]() Microsoft
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Microsoft
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Microsoft
|
| ScreenShots | AWS CloudFormation Screenshots |







