AWS CloudFormation vs. Azure DevOps Server
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS CloudFormation | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | AWS CloudFormation gives developers and systems administrators a way to create and manage a collection of related AWS resources, provisioning and updating them in a predictable fashion. Use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run an application. Users don’t need to figure out the order for provisioning AWS services or the subtleties of making those dependencies work.… | $0 |
![]() Azure DevOps Server | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server. | N/A |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There is no additional charge for using AWS CloudFormation with resource providers in the following namespaces: AWS::*, Alexa::*, and Custom::*. In this case you pay for AWS resources (such as Amazon EC2 instances, Elastic Load Balancing load balancers, etc.) created using AWS CloudFormation as if you created them manually. You only pay for what you use, as you use it; there are no minimum fees and no required upfront commitments. When you use resource providers with AWS CloudFormation outside the namespaces mentioned above, you incur charges per handler operation. Handler operations are create, update, delete, read, or list actions on a resource. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | 91% Would buy again 21 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 18 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
86% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | 91% Happy with the feature set 21 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 13 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | HashiCorp Vagrant Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Terraform Score8.7 out of 10 | ![]() Azure DevOps Score8.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Terraform Score8.7 out of 10 | ![]() Azure DevOps Score8.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | 8.0 | 6.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.4 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.0 |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure DevOps Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| ![]()
|
| Pros |
| ![]()
|
| Cons |
| ![]()
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Usability |
| ![]()
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Alternatives Considered |
| ![]()
|
| Return on Investment |
| ![]()
|
| ScreenShots | AWS CloudFormation Screenshots |







