AWS CloudFormation vs. IBM Cloud File Storage
AWS CloudFormation vs. IBM Cloud File Storage
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
AWS CloudFormation | N/A | AWS CloudFormation gives developers and systems administrators a way to create and manage a collection of related AWS resources, provisioning and updating them in a predictable fashion. Use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run an application. Users don’t need to figure out the order for provisioning AWS services or the subtleties of making those dependencies work.… | $0 | |
IBM Cloud File Storage | N/A | IBM Cloud provides a File Storage service allows the user to deploy and customize flash-backed NFS-based file storage from 25 GB to 12,000 GB capacity with up to 48,000 IOPS. | N/A |
AWS CloudFormation | IBM Cloud File Storage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | There is no additional charge for using AWS CloudFormation with resource providers in the following namespaces: AWS::*, Alexa::*, and Custom::*. In this case you pay for AWS resources (such as Amazon EC2 instances, Elastic Load Balancing load balancers, etc.) created using AWS CloudFormation as if you created them manually. You only pay for what you use, as you use it; there are no minimum fees and no required upfront commitments. When you use resource providers with AWS CloudFormation outside the namespaces mentioned above, you incur charges per handler operation. Handler operations are create, update, delete, read, or list actions on a resource. | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
AWS CloudFormation | IBM Cloud File Storage | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
| |
Top Cons |
|
|
AWS CloudFormation | IBM Cloud File Storage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
|
AWS CloudFormation | IBM Cloud File Storage | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | HashiCorp Vagrant Score 9.9 out of 10 | Akamai Cloud Computing Score 9.0 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | Ansible Score 8.9 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.1 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Ansible Score 8.9 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.1 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
AWS CloudFormation | IBM Cloud File Storage | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 7.6 (5 ratings) | 9.0 (40 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 8.2 (1 ratings) |
Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (6 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (2 ratings) |
AWS CloudFormation | IBM Cloud File Storage | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Amazon AWS | IBM |
Pros | Amazon AWS | IBM |
Cons | Amazon AWS | IBM |
Likelihood to Renew | Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | IBM |
Support Rating | Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | IBM |
Implementation Rating | Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | IBM |
Alternatives Considered | Amazon AWS | IBM |
Return on Investment | Amazon AWS | IBM |
ScreenShots | AWS CloudFormation Screenshots |