TrustRadius

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitKraken

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS CodeCommit
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It is designed to make it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem.
$1
Per Month Per User beyond the fifth
GitKraken
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
GitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.
$1,250
per installation
Pricing
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Editions & Modules
Subscription
$1.00
Per Month Per User beyond the fifth
Installed by You
$1250
per installed license
Hosted by GitKraken
Customized according to the amount of team members.
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
AWS CodeCommit
-
Ratings
GitKraken
9.9
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Branching and Merging00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Version History00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Pull Requests00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Code Review Tools00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Project Access Control00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Branch Protection00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 6.9 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 6.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.9
(5 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
Non-cloud users often complain about CodeCommit because it is so barebones, which it is. However, I believe that is by design. It is not supposed to be a full-fledged AI integrated GitLab alternative. Once users or developers get over the learning curve and required Cloud dependency, CodeCommit is a great service that offers a perfect complement / augmentation to on prem options. It is ideal for Cloud-native deployments where the code and production service are close together.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
The software is easy to use and share within our team. Licensing and setup is straightforward. The product just works and we love it.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Lightweight
  • Native IAM integration
  • Collaboration
  • High Availability
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Customizable workflow steps help organize projects
  • Time tracking down to seconds helps to estimate sprints
  • Burndown charts let you know when to plan your next release
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Integration with non-Cloud services
  • Learning curve for devs
  • Barebones
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Timing Out - when editing a story or bug, occasionally Axosoft will time out and all changes will be lost
  • Viewing past sprints can be hard to locate
  • Multiple users within a Story - Axosoft could do a better job managing multiple users on the same story
  • User Interface isn't entirely user friendly and looks a bit outdated
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
Over the years, I have used many Git tools, but GitKraken stands out. It's now my favorite Git tool by far—excellent graphical overview of the branches, straightforward usage of all functionality, and lots of integration available. Currently, I am using GitKraken to connect to the ADO and quickly create PRs, using gitflow and tracking the work of my team mates.
NN
Nenad Nicevski
Senior Technical Consultant
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
CodeCommit is a cloud native solution where GitHub is typically run on prem which requires a team to manage the physical servers and the software on top of it. CodeCommit is a better choice when doing Cloud focused workloads. GitHub Copilot offers more features than the leaner CodeCommit, however does not have the same integration options
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
I actually like JIRA better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • 20% reduction in traffic to on-prem GitHub
  • No additional server capacity required
  • No overhead or maintainance
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Productivity bump for developers over previous software
  • Code is never gone forever and can be found if needed
  • Allows us to collaborate and finish projects faster
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots