AWS CodeDeploy is a fully managed deployment service that automates software deployments to a variety of compute services such as Amazon EC2, AWS Fargate, AWS Lambda, and on-premises servers. AWS CodeDeploy aims to make it easier for users to rapidly release new features, avoid downtime during application deployment, and handle the complexity of updating applications.
$0.02
per on-premises instance
Red Hat Satellite
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat® Satellite is an infrastructure management product specifically designed to keep Red Hat Enterprise Linux® environments and other Red Hat infrastructure running efficiently, with security, and compliant with various standards.
N/A
Pricing
AWS CodeDeploy
Red Hat Satellite
Editions & Modules
AWS CodeDeploy
$0.02
per on-premises instance
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS CodeDeploy
Red Hat Satellite
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS CodeDeploy
Red Hat Satellite
Considered Both Products
AWS CodeDeploy
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose AWS CodeDeploy
Both have the same concept, but AWS has gained some ground over Google by creating cheaper services, and the fact they have servers wherever there is an Amazon makes the speed to access the platform faster and the jumps in the network also quicker. GCP has its global advantage …
Jenkins has been the reliable workhorse but it has aged quite a bit. The biggest issue with open source Jenkins is the requirement of hosting it by yourself, as it is not available inside AWS context as a service. That does fit into cloud-native thinking where you want to focus …
Jenkins supports a lot of plugings. Also with Jenkins, it is possible to manage everything through our own server. Those are 2 points where I rate Jenkins as one of the best DevOps Tool.
The most important reason we use AWS CodeDeploy was we use Amazon Web Services and our ecosystem platform. We want all the software components seamlessly integrated together. The CI/CD is always an issue to our software process, and also, we don't want to have any downtime when …
Not sure about this question, there a no other solutions that Satellites beside Foreman(free version without support) Are you talking about Red Hat in general ? If it is about RH, well, we like the support we have, all the tools available. We used to have a TAM, which as very …
For greenfield projects built on AWS there are very few reasons why not to choose AWS CodeDeploy. It works out of the box and integrates seamlessly into your cloud environment. If you plan to migrate your existing legacy builds away e.g. from Jenkins, you may need to reserve a substantial amount of time for that and the benefits gained may not be worth the effort.
Red Hat Satellite works amazingly with servers that need more control over their packages. For one or two servers that you're just doing "dnf update" Red Hat Satellite is way overkill.
Here is where AWS as a whole stepped up big. The UI is more intuitive and easy to use. The separation is clear, and the guides are abundant. They still need to create starter tutorials for newcomers so we don't lose much time learning/teaching others. Having someone with basic knowledge and examples where they can gain experience will make it better.
It is part of our daily job, without it, we will have to manually maintain a server with repos, update the repos, it will ask us a lot of time to prepare a new set of repos, and so on. Even if it is a bit tricky to use, and for a newcomer, it needs some time, we still love to use the tool, and we keep it up to date. Curerntly using v6.19.2
Both have the same concept, but AWS has gained some ground over Google by creating cheaper services, and the fact they have servers wherever there is an Amazon makes the speed to access the platform faster and the jumps in the network also quicker. GCP has its global advantage because it is extremely easy to use, but overall, AWS has more to offer as long as you know it.
Not sure about this question, there a no other solutions that Satellites beside Foreman(free version without support) Are you talking about Red Hat in general ? If it is about RH, well, we like the support we have, all the tools available. We used to have a TAM, which as very interesting, but the new cost to have was way to high... so we deciced to let it go.