Azuga Fleet vs. CoConstruct

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azuga Fleet
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Azuga in San Jose offers their fleet management software, Azuga Fleet, to government or insurance agencies requiring telematics or road usage charging, GPS capabilities, fleet tracking and analytics for optimization.N/A
CoConstruct
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
CoConstruct, from Buildertrend since the November 2021 acquisition, is a custom builder & remodeler software. It allows users to enter data once and have that information flow through the estimate, specs, selections, bids, proposals, change orders, and budgets, including to and from QuickBooks. In addition, CoConstruct includes scheduling and 3-way communication between builder, client, and trade partners. Everything is captured via email and texting. Login isn't required for…
$49
per month
Pricing
Azuga FleetCoConstruct
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Ramp
$49
per month
Plus 5
$299
per month
Plus 10
$399
per month
Plus 15
$499
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azuga FleetCoConstruct
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsCoConstruct pricing is based on active job sites that have client access online, which means it is adaptable to builders & remodelers businesses. This means that there are an unlimited amount of projects available for estimates and proposals, so that customers only pay when they win a contract. Also built into the pricing are a myriad of services: a dedicated implementation coach, free estimate & scheduling templates based on industry best practices from successful builders and the NAHB, unlimited storage and users, software branded with the customer's logo, unlimited amount of warranty projects, and unlimited phone & email support. The vendor offers a money-back guarantee that is good for the first 90 days of service.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azuga FleetCoConstruct
Best Alternatives
Azuga FleetCoConstruct
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Procore
Procore
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Procore
Procore
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Oracle Aconex
Oracle Aconex
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azuga FleetCoConstruct
Likelihood to Recommend
9.7
(4 ratings)
8.0
(14 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.8
(10 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azuga FleetCoConstruct
Likelihood to Recommend
Azuga
Azuga Fleet is good for small or large companies alike. A very effective way to track the fleet and drivers.
Read full review
Buildertrend
Having the ability to completely manage a project from start to finish with one app is super helpful. The time reporting feature (when it works correctly) is a nice added bonus as it allows employees to switch from one task to another on the same project or to another project and task with ease, aiding in the accounting process of the total project. This was helpful for running analytics to see where we were spending too much time on certain tasks, thus allowing us to assess any training needs.
Read full review
Pros
Azuga
  • Reporting (breadcrumb trail, speed, etc.)
  • Vehicle location overview
  • Route deviation and route timeliness
  • Ease of use
Read full review
Buildertrend
  • The integration of all aspects needed to run a remodeling company efficiently: project scheduling and management, financial planning and customer service. Since it’s an all-in-one suite and cloud-based, it enables our team to keep track of all our projects in real-time. Communication breakdown is the last thing we want, so being on the same page is not only desirable but makes for the best possible relationship with our clients.
  • Product education - We like how CoConstruct helps new users and get them to start using the tool right away. The dashboard resource materials are incredibly useful. We don’t have to spend a lot of time training new hires on the system and onboarding new clients.
Read full review
Cons
Azuga
  • Reporting functions could be better.
Read full review
Buildertrend
  • Internal Communication - CoConstruct lacks the ability to tag-team members for internal communication using @mentions or any other means. This has been crippling for us and forced us to use alternative software for communicating among our team members.
  • Pipeline Management - CoConstruct's lead-tracking system feels clunky and hard to navigate and doesn't provide a pipeline view that's easy to navigate. We have moved our Pipeline Management outside of CoConstruct to make it easier for our sales team to track leads.
  • CRM - CoConstruct doesn't offer anything for customer follow-up after projects are completed. This, in addition to the lack of an effective pipeline system, has led to our decision to use Hubspot as our CRM. Moving projects into CoConstruct for Design and back our after Production.
Read full review
Support Rating
Azuga
If/when we have an issue, they have been very timely in assisting us.
Read full review
Buildertrend
The support staff is brilliant; they don't operate on Australian time, so you can't just dial up support when you need it. The response times are quick, and the staff is knowledgeable. They are also well versed in most of the differences between buildings in the US and the building in Australasia. Despite their funny accents and strange use of the English language, we get by just fine!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Azuga
Azuga Fleet is much more user friendly. The information is the same, but Azuga Fleet delivers that information in a much easier and more logical way. The reporting functionality of Azuga Fleet is so much better than GeoTab--easier to access, easier to read, and just better overall. The only feature that GeoTab has is the school bus capability. But, it is also a much more difficult install. For the majority of our vehicles, the easy plugin install of Azuga Fleet is all we need.
Read full review
Buildertrend
Products like Procore and PlanGrid are geared towards projects with huge projects teams, multiple stakeholders and dozens of subcontractors. CoConstruct can be used for projects big and small (value) and also with small project teams or large projects teams. For small partial renovation or addition projects CoConstruct is a good more cost effective option.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Azuga
  • [Azuga Fleet] has saved us time and money by allowing us to direct or redirect technician to job thus making customers appreciate our timely services.
  • [Azuga Fleet] has [reduced] communication needs for dispatch to find a techs location. Less time on the phone and more production.
Read full review
Buildertrend
  • It made time recording much easier and much more reliable
  • With its GPS feature, we would be able to track when an employee left a job to help ensure accurate time recording
  • Having the ability to give the homeowners their own custom home building app to watch the progress helped to put us ahead of the game in the industry
  • Running job cost reports as easily as CoConstruct allows helped to curb some of our administrative fees
Read full review
ScreenShots

CoConstruct Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of