Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure DevOps Server | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server. | N/A |
GitKraken | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | GitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client. | $0 |
| Azure DevOps Server | GitKraken | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure DevOps Server | GitKraken | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
91% Would buy again 21 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 18 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 21 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Azure DevOps Server | GitKraken | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Version Control Software Features |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Azure DevOps Server | GitKraken | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | GitHub Score9.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() Azure DevOps Score8.1 out of 10 | Git Score10 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() Azure DevOps Score8.1 out of 10 | Perforce P4 Score7.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure DevOps Server | GitKraken | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 6.0 | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.4 | 5.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Azure DevOps Server | GitKraken | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
|
|
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
|
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots | GitKraken Screenshots |