Azure DevOps vs. Broadcom Automic Automation vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure DevOps
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps (formerly VSTS, Microsoft Visual Studio Team System) is an agile development product that is an extension of the Microsoft Visual Studio architecture. Azure DevOps includes software development, collaboration, and reporting capabilities.
$2
per GB (first 2GB free)
Broadcom Automic Automation
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Broadcom Automic Automation (formerly the CA Automic Business Automation Platform)is a workload automation and release / deployment management offering supported by Broadcom, which provides an open, scalable and unified approach to driving automation across, enableing the user to reduce time-to-value and increase business agility by using automation as the backbone of digital transformation.N/A
OpenText Operations Orchestration
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText™ Operations Orchestration automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automations use low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrations are done with an API-rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrates workflows.N/A
Pricing
Azure DevOpsBroadcom Automic AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Editions & Modules
Azure Artifacts
$2
per GB (first 2GB free)
Basic Plan
$6
per user per month (first 5 users free)
Azure Pipelines - Self-Hosted
$15
per extra parallel job (1 free parallel job with unlimited minutes)
Azure Pipelines - Microsoft Hosted
$40
per parallel job (1,800 minutes free with 1 free parallel job)
Basic + Test Plan
$52
per user per month
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DevOpsBroadcom Automic AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DevOpsBroadcom Automic AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Considered Multiple Products
Azure DevOps
Chose Azure DevOps
This is the first platform our dev team shared to us so I can't really compare but overall its such a great tool to have even if you are not from tech or dev team.
Chose Azure DevOps
We would use App Center for distributing our app to testers, and we could implement the same functionality as was handled by App Center, and as far as I remember we even had some automatic conversion of our jobs from App Center. After the conversion, we could see that Azure …
Chose Azure DevOps
We love the multi-tier hierarchy in Azure DevOps for tasks, with epics, features, stories, bugs and tasks all available in a nice nested hierarchy. It's not as pretty as Monday.com and doesn't work as well OOTB as ServiceNow SPM however.
Chose Azure DevOps
It is a similar tools with its pros and cons but does not really a differential - I would say it does the same but its own way, sometimes better, other times worst. It is a matter of preference or demands that come from superior decisions, so you just have to take it.
Chose Azure DevOps
Jira is fantastic for project management and customer facing portal. It is not good for pure development (no integration with Git, pipeline management, automated testing features). If DevOps were to integrate and adopt the project features of Jira as well as the customer facing …
Chose Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps provides integrated environment vs Jira is dependent on third party for couple of features
Chose Azure DevOps
The moment I have been working with this tool everything has benn operating efficiently. The software development process has borne positive results under scalable environment. The cost of running Azure DevOps Services us much lower as compared to other tools in the market. It …
Chose Azure DevOps
ADO has better linking than Confluence and is adaptable for a specific need, whereas Confluence might be a bit more rigid, but it's also sort of along the same lines as to what can be done with both tools. ADO also had an ease of use to it and can do a bunch of stuff with it, …
Chose Azure DevOps
Jira is super clunky and doesn't behave in a modern fashion. monday.com is too flexible and doesn't provide enough feature set. AWS is the most competitive, but it's hard to wrap your brain around all of the features and offerings provided by amazon. ADO does a better job of …
Chose Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps has a drag and drop editor so that you can quickly drag build steps into a build or release pipeline. This is much faster than looking up the correct yaml syntax. Additionally, its support for Microsoft and Azure is great. If you're on the .net stack or you use …
Chose Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps has more services and better integration with other tools. When it. Comes to the overall software development process management ecosystem.
Chose Azure DevOps
As a cloud services user of Azure, using Azure DevOps made sense because it has the most support tailored for Azure ecosystem.
Chose Azure DevOps
Microsoft Planner is used by project managers and IT service managers across our organization for task tracking and running their team meetings. Azure DevOps works better than Planner for software development teams but might possibly be too complex for non-software teams or …
Chose Azure DevOps
Graphically it overtakes the grade of traceability of artifacts delivered to environments More user-friendly to orchestrate the deliveries.
Chose Azure DevOps
Trello is simple to use, but it's only for a Kanban board. Jira might be the same, but I don't really have enough experience with Jira to fully compare them. When I used it, it missed certain functionalities that I was used to in Azure DevOps. Visually it's a lot different too.
Chose Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps Services have huge functionality and are well supported by Microsoft as well. You will get plenty of features in the marketplace and learning documentation.
Chose Azure DevOps
Writing the Docker Images, Storing them in Azure Container Registry and then Deploying onto Azure Kubernetes Services is an Easier process which no other software/product is currently providing in the market. Best till date in terms of End to End deployment and maintaining …
Chose Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps is widely used because of its collaboration and integration with various other tools. Here the assign of the sub task is quite easy compare to Jira. Also Azure Devops can we integrate easily with Git for better code representation and versioning. It reporting is …
Chose Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps is a completed product and ecosystem. It offers a robust ecosystem that does everything that is needed. The above products do lack features like pipelines tasks, third-party integrations. Besides all cloud benefits, the main advantage of Azure DevOps Services …
Chose Azure DevOps
Currently, we use both products, however, we use more the Atlassian suite. We have started recently using Azure DevOps for specific implementations and projects. We don't have any plan yet to migrate all our projects to Azure DevOps, we may in the next couple of years. …
Chose Azure DevOps
We tested alternatives for Azure DevOps over time. We tested GitHub a while ago and back then lack of some features that now hast, like the project boards and private repositories. We will check GitHub next year.

We also tested AWS CodeCommit and found it very cryptic, …
Chose Azure DevOps
Beside all cloud benefits, the main advantage Azure DevOps Services compared to Azure DevOps Server is the easier remote access for third party team members, and always up to date software.
On the other hand, on prem deployment (Azure DevOps Server) makes complex access or …
Chose Azure DevOps
The greatest strength of Azure DevOps Services (formerly VSTS) is that it's a one-stop solution for all agile project management instead of setting up bits of different software put together for each and every need. Azure DevOps Services (formerly VSTS) has a great ecosystem …
Chose Azure DevOps
I prefer Azure Devops over all other code repository / ci/cd systems that I've used in the past. All features are integrated into a single service (back log, repo mgmt, deployment pipelines, artifacts, etc.). The tools are easy to use and super powerful.
Chose Azure DevOps
Our company is already using a lot of Azure services and it makes more sense to start using Azure DevOps Services (formerly VSTS) when we needed a CI/CD tool. We tested different features of Azure DevOps Services (formerly VSTS) and found out that the build and release …
Broadcom Automic Automation
Chose Broadcom Automic Automation
1. Cost was the major factor without compromising the automation service which this product delivered. Other products are expensive and deliver the same outcome. 2. Limitation of job run, Broadcom Automic Automation allows to run unlimited jobs and helps to increase automation …
Chose Broadcom Automic Automation
Since other tools are all user interface based, they are prone to errors in terms of application exception, and the dependencies are comparatively higher for the automation to run successfully. This is not the case with the Automic One Automation Platform (formerly CA Automic …
OpenText Operations Orchestration
Chose OpenText Operations Orchestration
Most product works well enough, but none of them combine the non-agent/client approach to automation with an easy to develop mechanism (the drag&drop development approach) This alone put this solution on top of our preferred implantation product list
Features
Azure DevOpsBroadcom Automic AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Azure DevOps
-
Ratings
Broadcom Automic Automation
8.3
Ratings
0% above category average
OpenText Operations Orchestration
9.5
Ratings
14% above category average
Multi-platform scheduling00 Ratings9.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Central monitoring00 Ratings8.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Logging00 Ratings8.20 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications00 Ratings8.20 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization00 Ratings8.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Application integration00 Ratings8.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure DevOpsBroadcom Automic AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.4 out of 10
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.4 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure DevOpsBroadcom Automic AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DevOpsBroadcom Automic AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Likelihood to Recommend
DevOps is much more user friendly than Git itself. There is a more GUI-centric interface, tighter integration with the Azure / Entra architecture. For those of use in the Microsoft-sphere, it really is excellent for code-centric project management. I rate this as an 8 because it does not seem quite as well suited for fully functional / non-code project aspects in implementation. Nor does it have customer / end-user portal / front end for easy reporting and insight.
Read full review
Automic One Automation Platform (formerly CA Automic Automation Platform) is well suited for applications such as SAP and operating systems such as windows, Linux. It can be used to automate these applications as it can be done through remote function calls and business application peripheral interfaces. It can also be used to run scripts on remote machines, which further enables automation of ms office applications such as ms Excel and MS Word.
Read full review
For our business, this system is really THE system. We use it for the management of almost all aspects of a member's account. I honestly cannot think of something that it cannot do.
Read full review
Pros
  • Flexible Requirements Hierarchy Management: AZDO makes it easy to track items such as features or epics as a flat list, or as a hierarchy in which you can track the parent-child relationship.
  • Fast Data Entry: AZDO was designed to facilitate quick data entry to capture work items quickly, while still enabling detailed capture of acceptance criteria and item properties.
  • Excel Integration: AZDO stands out for its integration with MS Excel, which enables quick updates for bulk items.
Read full review
  • Batch Job of complex work load across platforms ERP system , Business Apps, Mainframe to Microservices
  • Digital business automation , accelerate the integration of big data and
  • Oracle automation, increase visibility and control on oracle EBS processing
  • Self Service automation, Simplify business service across the multi-cloud
  • Site reliability automation, enhances monitoring and correlation with intelligent recommendations and auto - remediation
Read full review
  • Allows for the quick disconnection of accounts that break our terms of service
  • Seamless integration with our billing system
  • Has the ability to house all member/client account information in one single location
Read full review
Cons
  • I did mention it has good visibility in terms of linking, but sometimes items do get lost, so if there was a better way to manage that, that would be great.
  • The wiki is not the prettiest thing to look at, so it could have refinements there.
  • It could improve the search slightly better.
Read full review
  • Could improve the framework.
  • Could improve the underlying coding standards.
Read full review
  • The product build in portal need to be more flexible
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I don't think our organization will stray from using VSTS/TFS as we are now looking to upgrade to the 2012 version. Since our business is software development and we want to meet the requirements of CMMI to deliver consistent and high quality software, this SDLC management tool is here to stay. In addition, our company uses a lot of Microsoft products, such as Office 365, Asp.net, etc, and since VSTS/TFS has proved itself invaluable to our own processes and is within the Microsoft family of products, we will continue to use VSTS/TFS for a long, long time.
Read full review
Automic is a very strong Automation Platform which enable us to implement user requirements quickly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It's a great help to get more information about new feature release and stay updated on what the dev team is working on. I like how easy it is to just login and read through the work items. Each work item has basic details: Title, Description, Assigned to, State, Area (what it belongs to), and iteration (when it’s worked on). See image above.They move through different states (New → Discovery → Ready for Prod → etc.).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
When we've had issues, both Microsoft support and the user community have been very responsive. DevOps has an active developer community and frankly, you can find most of your questions already asked and answered there. Microsoft also does a better job than most software vendors I've worked with creating detailed and frequently updated documentation.
Read full review
I have not used Automic One Automation Platform (formerly CA Automic Automation Platform) support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Was not part of the process.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We love the multi-tier hierarchy in Azure DevOps for tasks, with epics, features, stories, bugs and tasks all available in a nice nested hierarchy. It's not as pretty as monday.com and doesn't work as well OOTB as ServiceNow SPM however.
Read full review
1. Cost was the major factor without compromising the automation service which this product delivered. Other products are expensive and deliver the same outcome. 2. Limitation of job run, Broadcom Automic Automation allows to run unlimited jobs and helps to increase automation capability. 3. Number of automation packs available with no extra license cost. 4. Depth of coverage of technologies for batch job automation. 5. Required less number of hardware to achieve high availability.
Read full review
Most product works well enough, but none of them combine the non-agent/client approach to automation with an easy to develop mechanism (the drag&drop development approach) This alone put this solution on top of our preferred implantation product list
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Increased dev team efficiency through more streamlined development processes and task automation.
  • Improved quality of software deployments due to better source control, automated testing, and release management options available in DevOps.
  • Better collaboration between the dev team, business analysts, and agile project managers.
Read full review
  • Hours of server operations given over to end-users.
  • Single pipelines for job plan execution reduced the operational overhead.
Read full review
  • Product enabled reduce manpower and overall costs for most services implement.
  • The ROI is constantly being measured and evaluated by the product portal as time&money measurements
Read full review
ScreenShots