Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. IBM Cloud Container Registry

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is designed to make deploying and managing containerized applications easy. It offers serverless Kubernetes, an integrated continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) experience, and enterprise-grade security and governance. It allows development and operations teams on a single platform to rapidly build, deliver, and scale applications with confidence.N/A
IBM Cloud Container Registry
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Container Registry enables users to store and distribute container images, and run them in the IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service and other runtime environments.N/A
Pricing
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Considered Both Products
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

No answer on this topic

IBM Cloud Container Registry
Chose IBM Cloud Container Registry
When I need to work with private containers in a proof of concept I use IBM Cloud Container Registry.
Features
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
7.1
3 Ratings
13% below category average
IBM Cloud Container Registry
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation8.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management6.23 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management6.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization7.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks4.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(6 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)IBM Cloud Container Registry
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
AKS works very well for running containerized applications that require high availability and scalability. This includes systems like our HRIS platform and customer-facing web applications. AKS is a good choice when applications are broken into multiple services that need independent scaling and deployment. It provides the flexibility needed to manage these architectures effectively. But for single, low-traffic applications or simple internal tools, AKS can be overkill. For scenarios like that Azure App Service would be better.
Read full review
IBM
When I need to do a proof of concept of a solution for a client and it must have high levels of privacy and at the same time performance, I use IBM Cloud Container Registry.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • AKS makes it easier to replicate data to multiple regions
  • Azure portal make it easier to manage the resources of the organization
Read full review
IBM
  • Scalable Plans
  • Easily integrate it with IBM Kube service
  • Easy integration with IBM Cloud CI/CD tools.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Steep learning curve
  • Expected charges are unclear until you see real production usage
  • Operations teams need to learn an entirely new skill set
Read full review
IBM
  • Kubernetes
  • CI/CD
  • Docker
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
It is not as straight forward and user friendly as in AWS or GCP. It needs a lot of monitoring and checking if any failed services have been deallocated or not. It feels like the managed service only actually manages the UI and not much beyond it. I works so you can't complain but it can be tonnes better.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Microsoft support was really good, whenever we raise any ticket they come back to us within a couple of hours.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Due to cost efficiency. And using AZURE cloud for other services as well. Azure Kubernetes Service is more suitable to configure CI/CD pipelines. With a facility of automated or One click deployment and integration of the application. As compared with other Kubernetes Services like Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service and Google Kubernetes Service, Azure Kubernetes is most cost-efficient with the same facilities and with an advantage to configure easily, manage easily, as it is one click manageable with Microsoft applications. It provides high Microsoft security to containers and secures applications from any kind of harm.
Read full review
IBM
Not Applicable in our case. We started using IBM container registry as IBM bluemix is our preferred cloud platform
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • The ability to scale has reduced the need for headcount in IT
  • The authentication process has kept us compliant with regulatory bodies
  • The ability to replicate environments is great.
Read full review
IBM
  • reliability
  • easy integration
  • multicloud
Read full review
ScreenShots