Azure Logic Apps vs. Camunda

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Logic Apps
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers the Azure Logic Apps as a cloud-based integration service, supporting data and application integration.
$0
per execution
Camunda
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Camunda is a process orchestration tool designed to help organizations design, automate, and improve any process. Built for business and IT collaboration using BPMN and DMN standards, Camunda aims to enable seamless integration across endpoints to transform mission-critical processes.N/A
Pricing
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Editions & Modules
Actions
$0.000025
per execution
Standard Connector
$0.000025
per execution
Enterprise Connector
$0.001
per execution
Integration Account - Basic
$0.42
per hour
Integration Account - Standard
$1.37
per hour
Self-Managed Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
SaaS Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Features
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
8.6
16 Ratings
7% above category average
Camunda
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors9.316 Ratings00 Ratings
Connector modification9.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration8.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality services8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
Data security features8.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring console8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
9.0
1 Ratings
36% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
8.0
1 Ratings
1% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
8.5
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
9.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Business Process Modeling00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Decision Modeling00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 9.4 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Make
Make
Score 9.4 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(16 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Logic AppsCamunda
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps was a perfect solution for us to integrate the apps and products we used in our business to create automated workflows which were also complex and very advanced. This was a very new feature for us, and also it reduced our software costs massively and also saved us a lot of time. With the crisis, we were in back then Azure turned out to be the best cost-friendly solution because we only had to pay for what we used!
Read full review
Camunda
Camunda Platform is well suited for scenarios where there are different stages in a business flow and the flow is driven by user action at each stage. For example placing of an order on an ecommerce platform. Depending on whether user was able to make the payment or not the workflow would go to dispatch or retry stage. Now the retry stage would trigger further actions like sending follow up emails etc. Likewise, dispatch stage would have a different set of actions. Since every order is important and we need to know where it stands, using Camunda Platform is imperative. Camunda Platform might not be a right choice where just a one off thing needs to be done. For example, uploading of product information by user or periodic processing of heavy images by a worker. These are all either one step processes or periodic automated processes where we can track the status without using a business modeler like Camunda Platform.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Connecting to different services using OOB connectors
  • Support for HTTP connectors which enables user to leverage RestAPIs
  • Readability, i.e., it looks just like a Visio diagram. Even managers or HRs can have a look and get to know what's happening
  • It's a Programmer's Lego. It's fun connecting them at the same time getting the work done
Read full review
Camunda
  • Asynchronous functionality of Camunda Platform and different types of gateways.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It falls short of alerting capabilities.
  • Microsoft Azure should be unclouded with its pricing. We don't always know how much an inclusion will affect the monthly price. So we have to speculate where we are with the price and if we can afford to include another asset.
Read full review
Camunda
  • Camunda expects that you will develop your own user interfaces. This is either a benefit or a barrier depending on your perspective on packaged UI.
  • As an open source vendor, Camunda is under-covered in analyst reports.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
I found them easy to use and adapt to different scenarios, from Azure management to link processes between REST APIs. Together with Function Apps, they're probably the most useful resource type for Azure. Today, I use them in production, and that's a key component: stable, secure, easy to manage, and maintain.
Read full review
Camunda
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Azure Logic Apps are backed by Azure and Microsoft. There is a wealth of information on the internet about both of these platforms. In addition to this Microsoft has a huge bush to using this platform and have offered many solutions and support options to the user. The only drawback is that it is a fairly new platform so the 3rd party information tends to be lacking.
Read full review
Camunda
Camunda provides pretty standard product support offerings.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
This is very dependent on the line of work you are in and the unique company requirements, as is the case with everything. We utilize Azure Logic Apps for all of our computing solutions within our domain, and it has always worked flawlessly. One of the simplest clouds to set up and use is by far the most popular.
Read full review
Camunda
Lacks good documentation. Training and documentation is geared towards those who are already technically adept. Does not have as many data integrations as other full fledged products. Paid version of Camunda is not as fully fledged as other products.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Moving to Serverless Computing obviously makes the organization get rid of dependent Infra.
  • ROI can be seen immediately as the required infra can be decommissioned after a successful quarter run.
  • Being deployed as a single entity or single app on Azure Logic Apps, Organizations need to be more careful with controls applied to meet compliance and security posture.
Read full review
Camunda
  • The positive impact is that we are able to ensure the business process is being followed and that results in orders getting processed successfully leading to customer satisfaction and revenue
  • Another positive impact is that we are able to track any anomalies and any errors in the order flow and retry them so that users don't have a negative experience.
  • A negative point is that it is an overhead to maintain so there is significant engineering effort getting invested there
Read full review
ScreenShots

Camunda Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of