Microsoft offers the Azure Logic Apps as a cloud-based integration service, supporting data and application integration.
$0
per execution
Camunda
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Camunda is a process orchestration tool designed to help organizations design, automate, and improve any process. Built for business and IT collaboration using BPMN and DMN standards, Camunda aims to enable seamless integration across endpoints to transform mission-critical processes.
N/A
Pricing
Azure Logic Apps
Camunda
Editions & Modules
Actions
$0.000025
per execution
Standard Connector
$0.000025
per execution
Enterprise Connector
$0.001
per execution
Integration Account - Basic
$0.42
per hour
Integration Account - Standard
$1.37
per hour
Self-Managed Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
SaaS Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Logic Apps
Camunda
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Logic Apps
Camunda
Features
Azure Logic Apps
Camunda
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
8.6
16 Ratings
7% above category average
Camunda
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors
9.316 Ratings
00 Ratings
Connector modification
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration
8.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality services
8.514 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data security features
8.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Monitoring console
8.514 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
9.0
1 Ratings
36% above category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
8.0
1 Ratings
1% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
Camunda
8.5
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Process designer
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Form builder
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps was a perfect solution for us to integrate the apps and products we used in our business to create automated workflows which were also complex and very advanced. This was a very new feature for us, and also it reduced our software costs massively and also saved us a lot of time. With the crisis, we were in back then Azure turned out to be the best cost-friendly solution because we only had to pay for what we used!
Camunda Platform is well suited for scenarios where there are different stages in a business flow and the flow is driven by user action at each stage. For example placing of an order on an ecommerce platform. Depending on whether user was able to make the payment or not the workflow would go to dispatch or retry stage. Now the retry stage would trigger further actions like sending follow up emails etc. Likewise, dispatch stage would have a different set of actions. Since every order is important and we need to know where it stands, using Camunda Platform is imperative. Camunda Platform might not be a right choice where just a one off thing needs to be done. For example, uploading of product information by user or periodic processing of heavy images by a worker. These are all either one step processes or periodic automated processes where we can track the status without using a business modeler like Camunda Platform.
Microsoft Azure should be unclouded with its pricing. We don't always know how much an inclusion will affect the monthly price. So we have to speculate where we are with the price and if we can afford to include another asset.
I found them easy to use and adapt to different scenarios, from Azure management to link processes between REST APIs. Together with Function Apps, they're probably the most useful resource type for Azure. Today, I use them in production, and that's a key component: stable, secure, easy to manage, and maintain.
Azure Logic Apps are backed by Azure and Microsoft. There is a wealth of information on the internet about both of these platforms. In addition to this Microsoft has a huge bush to using this platform and have offered many solutions and support options to the user. The only drawback is that it is a fairly new platform so the 3rd party information tends to be lacking.
This is very dependent on the line of work you are in and the unique company requirements, as is the case with everything. We utilize Azure Logic Apps for all of our computing solutions within our domain, and it has always worked flawlessly. One of the simplest clouds to set up and use is by far the most popular.
Lacks good documentation. Training and documentation is geared towards those who are already technically adept. Does not have as many data integrations as other full fledged products. Paid version of Camunda is not as fully fledged as other products.
Moving to Serverless Computing obviously makes the organization get rid of dependent Infra.
ROI can be seen immediately as the required infra can be decommissioned after a successful quarter run.
Being deployed as a single entity or single app on Azure Logic Apps, Organizations need to be more careful with controls applied to meet compliance and security posture.
The positive impact is that we are able to ensure the business process is being followed and that results in orders getting processed successfully leading to customer satisfaction and revenue
Another positive impact is that we are able to track any anomalies and any errors in the order flow and retry them so that users don't have a negative experience.
A negative point is that it is an overhead to maintain so there is significant engineering effort getting invested there