TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Logic Apps vs. Qlik Automate vs. SAP Integration Suite

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Logic Apps

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft offers the Azure Logic Apps as a cloud-based integration service, supporting data and application integration.

    $0

    per execution

    Qlik Automate

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AQlik Automate is used to create dynamic processes that automatically respond to business events and trigger informed actions to an enterprise's SaaS applications. Its highly-visual automation builder helps users to rapidly assemble blocks to create sophisticated workflows.N/A

    SAP Integration Suite

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ASAP Integration Suite is a modern, secure integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that connects applications, data, processes, and AI agents across SAP and non‑SAP environments.

    $11,199

    per year

    Pricing
    Azure Logic AppsQlik AutomateSAP Integration Suite
    Editions & Modules
    Actions
    $0.000025
    per execution
    Standard Connector
    $0.000025
    per execution
    Enterprise Connector
    $0.001
    per execution
    Integration Account - Basic
    $0.42
    per hour
    Integration Account - Standard
    $1.37
    per hour
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Logic AppsQlik AutomateSAP Integration Suite
    Free Trial
    YesYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——Access to free tier services does not expire while there is an active Pay-As-You-Go or CPEA account with SAP. Once a free tier service limit has been reached users have the option to update from a free to a paid service plan in the same account.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Logic AppsQlik AutomateSAP Integration Suite
    Considered Multiple Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Azure Logic Apps
    When we proposed products for central integration, we were also introduced to software like Pabbly - which was in its early stages of company growth. The main reason why we picked Azure Logic apps over the other software is that it is manufactured by the renowned company …
    Incentivized
    Qlik
    No answer on this topic
    SAP
    Chose SAP Integration Suite
    Because of ease and the plethora of adapters and connectors, we use the SAP integration suite.
    Incentivized
    Chose SAP Integration Suite
    It fitted our BTP story better for these clients, and it was more easily enabled for BTP
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    14 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Would buy again
    272 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    240 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    14 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    293 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    163 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    229 Answers
    Features
    Azure Logic AppsQlik AutomateSAP Integration Suite
    Cloud Data Integration
    Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Azure Logic Apps and Qlik Automate and SAP Integration Suite
    Feature
    Azure Logic Apps
    8.5
    16 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Qlik Automate
    -
    Ratings
    SAP Integration Suite
    7.9
    270 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Pre-built connectors9.416 Ratings00 Ratings8.4255 Ratings
    Connector modification9.015 Ratings00 Ratings7.7218 Ratings
    Support for real-time and batch integration8.114 Ratings00 Ratings8.0249 Ratings
    Data quality services8.214 Ratings00 Ratings7.9226 Ratings
    Data security features7.715 Ratings00 Ratings8.1238 Ratings
    Monitoring console8.214 Ratings00 Ratings7.0246 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Logic AppsQlik AutomateSAP Integration Suite
    Small Businesses
    Make
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Bizagi
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Make
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM App Connect
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM App Connect
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Workato
    Score9.3 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    Workato
    Score9.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Logic AppsQlik AutomateSAP Integration Suite
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (16 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (356 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (13 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.5
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (9 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Logic AppsQlik AutomateSAP Integration Suite
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Azure Logic Apps was a perfect solution for us to integrate the apps and products we used in our business to create automated workflows which were also complex and very advanced. This was a very new feature for us, and also it reduced our software costs massively and also saved us a lot of time. With the crisis, we were in back then Azure turned out to be the best cost-friendly solution because we only had to pay for what we used!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    Good at: 1. Integrations with in SAP applications, especially with event based triggers 2. Can be integrated very well with other BTP services to attain Batch processing and store credentials 3. Supports many authentication models Improvements: 1. No version history available compared to as it is available in S4HANA 2. Need a lot of improvement in git hub connections
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Connecting to different services using OOB connectors
    • Support for HTTP connectors which enables user to leverage RestAPIs
    • Readability, i.e., it looks just like a Visio diagram. Even managers or HRs can have a look and get to know what's happening
    • It's a Programmer's Lego. It's fun connecting them at the same time getting the work done
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    • The extensive catalog of pre package integrations that have in the discovery center. That allows developers to find solutions that can fit the needs.
    • Monitor of the integrations and api deployed.
    • API management has been for us a very usefull tool inside integration suite, to be able to have the API Hub with the documentation of our apis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • It falls short of alerting capabilities.
    • Microsoft Azure should be unclouded with its pricing. We don't always know how much an inclusion will affect the monthly price. So we have to speculate where we are with the price and if we can afford to include another asset.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    • Provide more pre-built integrations to use within SuccessFactors or other modules instead of everything having to be custom built
    • Support is unable to provide advice on custom builds so you often have to engage a 3rd party partner
    • Works best when you have the functional and technical teams working together. Otherwise, the system is too technical for a functional user to create integration and a technical user not always understand the functional perspective
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Qlik
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    It is in place, our system integrators are familiar with it, and it fits into the ecosystem. A better user interface, flow build and debugging experience would see it grow, many technical staff do not enjoy using it for this reason, however it is quite capable and powerful behind this one shortcoming.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    I found them easy to use and adapt to different scenarios, from Azure management to link processes between REST APIs. Together with Function Apps, they're probably the most useful resource type for Azure. Today, I use them in production, and that's a key component: stable, secure, easy to manage, and maintain.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    The user interface is messy and not intuitive. It has a steep learning curve, and flows developed around are easy to make a mess with layout and can be difficult to follow. The debugging is also quite difficult, it takes some time to figure out how to follow the flow and examine data. Error handling is also difficult and not intuitive, it is better to let some errors leak and monitor through ALM.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    Azure Logic Apps are backed by Azure and Microsoft. There is a wealth of information on the internet about both of these platforms. In addition to this Microsoft has a huge bush to using this platform and have offered many solutions and support options to the user. The only drawback is that it is a fairly new platform so the 3rd party information tends to be lacking.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    The support for SAP Integration Suite is satisfactory. We leverage SAP support through our manage services partner. So far, we have not had many major issues. One concern, to make our rating a ten, would be turnaround time on high priority incidents. SAP Integration Suite drives our key business functions forward. Without a reasonable service level agreement on turnaround, we sometimes find us running into issues running pay, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Qlik
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    Work with an SAP implementation partner, if possible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    This is very dependent on the line of work you are in and the unique company requirements, as is the case with everything. We utilize Azure Logic Apps for all of our computing solutions within our domain, and it has always worked flawlessly. One of the simplest clouds to set up and use is by far the most popular.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    Before deploying SAP Integration Suite, we assessed Oracle Financial Services Analytics and IBM Risk Analytics. While Oracle had proved its mettle in the exceptional database support and IBM in presenting risk model tools, SAP Integration Suite overwhelmed others by being effortlessly integrated with our existing banking framework.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Moving to Serverless Computing obviously makes the organization get rid of dependent Infra.
    • ROI can be seen immediately as the required infra can be decommissioned after a successful quarter run.
    • Being deployed as a single entity or single app on Azure Logic Apps, Organizations need to be more careful with controls applied to meet compliance and security posture.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    • Positive impact would be availability of pre-defined integration content via templates.
    • One can re-use a template as a starting point to modify and adopt to client-specific integration flow.
    • Availability of adaptors and connectors, making it easier to piece together the integration flow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Qlik Automate Screenshots

    Screenshot of Integration Hub

    SAP Integration Suite Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot