What users are saying about
15 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.9 out of 100
52 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.2 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)

    8.5

    Azure NetApp Files

    85%

    IBM Cloud Internet Services

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    Azure NetApp Files ranks higher in 9/9 features

    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime

    8.9
    89%
    8 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Dynamic scaling

    8.6
    86%
    8 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Elastic load balancing

    8.8
    88%
    7 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Pre-configured templates

    8.4
    84%
    7 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Monitoring tools

    8.0
    80%
    8 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Pre-defined machine images

    8.4
    84%
    6 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Operating system support

    9.0
    90%
    8 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Security controls

    8.6
    86%
    8 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Automation

    8.0
    80%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • Azure NetApp Files is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

    Likelihood to Recommend

    7.9

    Azure NetApp Files

    79%
    8 Ratings
    7.7

    IBM Cloud Internet Services

    77%
    10 Ratings

    Usability

    Azure NetApp Files

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    6.0

    IBM Cloud Internet Services

    60%
    1 Rating

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Azure NetApp Files

    In my opinion, I would say it is more suitable to huge workloads, where you really needs the reliability and performance that a Netapp storage provides to you, larger share sizes, etc. Use cases where you really needs to store large amounts of non-structured data.It is not a cheap solution, I mean, you can find other options to store your data on the Cloud at smaller prices. So, for small companies, or companies that depends mostly on web-applications, or don't have such a specific requirements, I would not go with Azure Netapp Files.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    IBM Cloud Internet Services

    In terms of business challenges, it simplifies the job of my engineers and significantly increases the productivity of my teams when they collaborate with IBM teams all over the world. Now that we have completed a proof-of-concept using the services supplied by IBM, we expect it to assist us in managing them more efficiently; thus far, management has been straightforward.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pros

    Azure NetApp Files

    • We have found that it scales very well. In some cases we had a large existing storage infrastructure and were able to migrate it while other times we started from scratch with low storage demands and Azure NetApp Files fit the bill each time.
    • We have been impressed with the replication capabailities.
    • The read and write speed when interacting with files is a major asset.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    IBM Cloud Internet Services

    • Integration with IBM Cloud applications
    • Easy to manage web application firewall
    • Ease of protecting CloudFoundry applications
    • Good console UI
    • Protection for rare managed service offerings such as CouchDB through IBM Cloudant
    Ramindu Deshapriya | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Cons

    Azure NetApp Files

    • It does not support file locking although its available as an add-on
    • Design is far from native and has a learning curve
    • We would like to have backup functionality built in so that we don't run into the issue where the replication process makes a copy of the corrupted data.
    HARDIK CHUDASAMA | TrustRadius Reviewer

    IBM Cloud Internet Services

    • Request proxying is done by way of DNS name resolution, which is inflexible.
    • Proxy services do not work on wildcard DNS entries.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pricing Details

    Azure NetApp Files

    General

    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    $0 per month

    Azure NetApp Files Editions & Modules

    Edition
    Standard Storage$0.14746 per GiB1
    Premium Storage$0.29419 per GiB1
    Ultra Storage$0.39274 per GiB1
    Cross Region Replication Minutes - Replication frequency is every 10 mins$0.14/GiB1
    Cross Region Replication Hourly - Replication frequency is every 1 hour$0.12/GiB1
    Cross Region Replication Daily - Replication frequency is once a day$0.11/GiB1
    Backup$0.05/GiB1
    Restore$0.02/GiB1
    1. per month
    Additional Pricing Details
    Azure NetApp Files (ANF) cloud file storage service is charged per hour based on the provisioned ANF capacity. Customers can provision a minimum of 4TiB of ANF capacity and then add additional provision capacity in the increments of 1TiB. Cross Region Replication pricing varies by the desired replication frequency per unit of data, and the region of the destination volume.

    IBM Cloud Internet Services

    General

    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    $0

    IBM Cloud Internet Services Editions & Modules

    Edition
    IBM Cloud Internet Services - Standard$275.001
    IBM Cloud Internet Services - EnterpriseCall
    1. per month, per domain
    2. none
    Additional Pricing Details

    Usability

    Azure NetApp Files

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    IBM Cloud Internet Services

    IBM Cloud Internet Services 6.0
    Based on 1 answer
    I have seen faster and more user friendly interfaces like Azure
    Alexandre Carvalho | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Alternatives Considered

    Azure NetApp Files

    Azure NetApp Files is very well integrated with Microsoft Azure, we use the same request methods that everyone knows from Azure. NetApp and Microsoft has built a very efficient solution that allows you to transfer virtually any service to the Microsoft public cloud. Azure NetApp Files also protects our data very well.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    IBM Cloud Internet Services

    I have used Salesforce to explore it as an app but I have found them both able to solve my needs and requirements when it comes to security. While I choose IBM Cloud Internet Services for more accessibility, a better price was available with Saleforce. Although that is just my observation.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Return on Investment

    Azure NetApp Files

    • The main hurdle in promoting this solution is the price. Its price definitely requires an improvement. It is more expensive than other options, so customers go for a cheaper option.
    • Its security and ease of use are most valuable.
    • It is stable and scalable.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    IBM Cloud Internet Services

    • It had a positive impact with a big improvement on the performance of web applications.
    • Services are quite fast to implement and easy to maintain from an IT perspective.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Add comparison