Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage
Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure Red Hat OpenShift | N/A | Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand, monitored and operated jointly by Microsoft and Red Hat. The version provides joint engineering, operation, and support from Microsoft and Red Hat, with multiple compliance certifications. | N/A | |
IBM Cloud Object Storage | N/A | IBM Cloud Object Storage is an IBM Cloud product in the endpoint backup and IaaS categories. It is commonly used for data archiving and backup, for web and mobile applications, and as scalable, persistent storage for analytics. | $0 per month |
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Cloud Object Storage | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | The One-Rate and Standard service plans for Cloud Object Storage include resiliency options, flexible data classes and built-in security. Pricing is based on the choice of location, storage class and resiliency choice. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Cloud Object Storage |
|---|
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Cloud Object Storage | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
|
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Cloud Object Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | DigitalOcean Droplets Score 9.4 out of 10 | DigitalOcean Droplets Score 9.4 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.0 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.0 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.0 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.0 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Cloud Object Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 9.4 (158 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (5 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (1 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (1 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (8 ratings) |
| Online Training | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (1 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 5.8 (4 ratings) |
| Azure Red Hat OpenShift | IBM Cloud Object Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Pros | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Cons | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Usability | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Performance | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Support Rating | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Online Training | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Scalability | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Cloud Object Storage Screenshots |














