Azurepath is designed to automate lead management and performance tracking for insightful business growth. According to the vendor, Azurepath is remarkably easy to use and suitable for any sized business selling any kind of product or service. Visual lead queues for individuals and teams eliminate tasks and calendars. Automated trend charts with built-in insights eliminate manual reporting. The vendor’s value proposition is that seamless integrated sales and cash forecasting allow for…
N/A
Coevera
Score8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Coevera is a CRM and sales process platform for B2B sales organizations of 15 to 2,500 quota-carrying sellers — companies with a defined sales process, managers accountable for pipeline, and deals won through consultation. Formerly Pipeliner CRM, the company has built sales software since 2011. Coevera reports 4 weeks to implement, no full-time administrator required, 2 hours to onboard a user, and a lower total cost of ownership. Sales leaders get a forecast they can defend.…
$1,500
per month 15 users (minimum)
Pricing
Azurepath
Coevera
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Business - Full CRM functionality, customization and unique productivity features.
$100
per month per user
Enterprise - Full CRM functionality with advanced reporting, customization and services.
$130
per month per user
Unlimited - Full CRM functionality with advanced reporting, customization and services.
$165
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azurepath
Coevera
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Free 30 day trial with no credit card required. $14.95 per user, per month thereafter. Unlimited usage.
15 user minimum for all plans. 15% discount for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azurepath
Coevera
Considered Both Products
Azurepath, LLC.
Verified User
Chose Azurepath
They are both strong CRMs which are effective at their job of automation to generate data regarding sales. However I would say Azurepath is simply better in terms of it's price as the features offered in my opinion far exceed the low costs which come with the package, hence …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Like stated previously, Azurepath is well suited to automate sales performance reporting, as this is essential for the business sector in which myself and my company operates in. Furthermore, it is also very useful in terms of the user interface and GUI which are very easy to understand and process - even if you lack significant knowledge on how to do so. My only 'issue' is very minor and this is to do with customer service, however it could have been an off day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Pipeliner CRM is very flexible, easy to work with, data capturing is at [its] best, its integration to other major software’s and it aids in the monitoring of the core work process. One distinctive feature is it is very easy to learn without extensive training. This really helps in the [execution] of the task in our organization.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The product development team at Pipeliner CRM always seems to be a step or two ahead of what I'm experiencing. Therefore they've already addressed improvements I could have suggested. They are really in touch with their users and overall user experience.
Currently the company is using the Pipeliner CRM because we believe it is a tool that puts the customer as the main focus of business processes in order to understand and anticipate their needs, and then serve them in the best way.
I gave that rating level because it reflects both my satisfaction and expectations about PipelinerCRM.Plus, the adoption rate of this software. I mean the usability rate is very low. It just takes, for learning, a couple of hours less than three days roughly. Return on time investment is low also.
The support from Pipeliner CRM is superb; they have instant customer support and they are on time. They also give enough knowledge of sales and other material for the knowledge. They also have AI in the support by talking with customer support directly from the web or app and so on.
They are both strong CRMs which are effective at their job of automation to generate data regarding sales. However I would say Azurepath is simply better in terms of it's price as the features offered in my opinion far exceed the low costs which come with the package, hence making it exceptional value for money for potential suitors
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The most important reason for selecting pipeliner CRM:-exceptional user engagement through its sales-friendly interface. With its uniform navigation and visual approach, users can learn the system quickly. Users can easily customize what they see to make the system their own. Best user interface & fast to learn.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
