Back vs. BMC FootPrints

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Back
Score 0.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Back is a collaboration and automation platform that enables internal service and business operations teams to manage workplace requests in one platform. The digital workplace promised to improve work for humans. But instead of removing distractions, it multiplies them. Finding or filing a piece of information can be time consuming, as everything is scattered throughout various systems. Getting help for a problem from the right colleague isn’t trivial, as different teams often use…
$40
per agent per month
BMC FootPrints
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
BMC FootPrints is an IT service management (ITSM) solution featuring workload automation.N/A
Pricing
BackBMC FootPrints
Editions & Modules
Business
€40
per agent per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BackBMC FootPrints
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BackBMC FootPrints
Considered Both Products
Back

No answer on this topic

BMC FootPrints
Chose BMC FootPrints
Both are developed from the same vendor but Footprints is so complete for all the configurations that we need (we are a medium business company). BMC Remedy has a little more friendly interface but it doesn't meet our needs. We prefer a product that fits better our needs to a …
Chose BMC FootPrints
I did not chose the program it was chosen and implemented by our IT team. Based on verified reviews from real users in the IT Service Management Tools market.
Chose BMC FootPrints
We have not evaluated any other software up against BMC FootPrints.
Chose BMC FootPrints
We haven't used any others besides this one, but we did evaluate BMC Remedyforce, SysAid, and ServiceNow. Remedyforce and ServiceNow seem much more advanced and difficult to use, though I'm sure they are probably much more feature-rich once you get used to them, but the …
Chose BMC FootPrints
I was not involved in the selection process but in my opinion either SQL or Access databases would have worked just as well without the same amount of cost. These two systems would have been much easier to manage and would have tracked the same information in a less convoluted …
Chose BMC FootPrints
I didn't select FootPrints. It is what the current company chose. I would much rather use JIRA and Confluence.
Chose BMC FootPrints
I did not select BMC footprints in my previous role and I am not sure what dictated that decision.
Chose BMC FootPrints
We already had Footprints deployed when I started, and we have not done any evaluation in the last seven years.
Chose BMC FootPrints
We only used an in house built system before and this blows everything the old software was capable of out of the water.
Chose BMC FootPrints
We have evaluated multiple including HEAT and ServiceNow. Their older versions gave us more to play with and able to use more, but since going to version 11, it has been very unfavorable. We have had to adapt and work with what was provided. We have understood that ServiceNow …
Chose BMC FootPrints
BMC offers vast functionality, that also can be overwhelming. If proper training and execution of its bolts and parts are completed properly, this tool can provide the efficiency and tracking that a Enterprise Business requires.
Chose BMC FootPrints
If you are looking for something for a large corporation, BMC Footprints may be the fit for any department that needs to communicate/resolve issues across other departments. It is great for a large amount of users, but because of its focus on issue logging, it is limited when …
Chose BMC FootPrints
I was not the one who selected Footprints.
Chose BMC FootPrints
We liked it because it has more features and a better price and its not cloud based.
Features
BackBMC FootPrints
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Back
-
Ratings
BMC FootPrints
8.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Expert directory00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Service restoration00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Self-service tools00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
Back
-
Ratings
BMC FootPrints
7.9
Ratings
3% below category average
Configuration mangement00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Asset management dashboard00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
Back
-
Ratings
BMC FootPrints
9.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Change requests repository00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Change calendar00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Service-level management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BackBMC FootPrints
Small Businesses
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BackBMC FootPrints
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BackBMC FootPrints
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Tracing any maintenance requests, so you don't forget any requests, it also sends an email to the requestor once the project is completed. Keeping status of projects in progress and the current state they are in. Allowing anyone with access to know the current state of any project. Generating a useful report is a bit more difficult then I would like.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Documentation. We try to reduce the amount of paperwork needed for staff to do their job, so by automating certain tasks, we are able to speed up the resolution process for trouble tickets.
  • Reporting. We'll use the reporting tool to get the number of tickets opened, response times and can go into granular reports.
  • Surveys. When tickets are closed, we automatically send out surveys to end users to get valuable feedback on how we did and what we can improve.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Purpose based configuration- It would be beneficial to see a more purposed based, out of the box, configuration option. For example, if you need PCI compliance, more intuitive reporting would make managing compliance much easier.
  • Initial design and implementation- Don't think that your experience as an IT professional will allow you to stand this system up on your own. To properly configure Footprints and set yourself up for success down the road, get Professional Services with this one.
  • Somewhat behind the times- Service Core is making a huge leap forward with the latest version, 12, but Asset Core is far behind. There are quite a few quirks to how the application works and how it is used.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It has been the business decision to go with them and that is what we will do. Going back, this would have not been the choice, but nothing can be done about it now. We are stuck with this application for years to come. Wish there were other possibilities that could be done.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It's so simple to use and customize however you want. You can create new workspaces and workflows with ease, set up new users, incoming email rules, customize the layout of the forms, and even change the colors and logos. It's just very easily customizable overall. It's also really straightforward to figure out how to use, you really almost don't have to show somebody how to use it. If you just sit them down in front of it and let them look it over, they could figure it out themselves easily.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I've had no issues with the support for FootPrints. We haven't really had to use them all that much over the years, but when needed they have always been prompt and knowledgeable at dealing with any issue. I've worked with a lot of different support teams over the years, and they have been one of my favorites to work with.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Both are developed from the same vendor but Footprints is so complete for all the configurations that we need (we are a medium business company). BMC Remedy has a little more friendly interface but it doesn't meet our needs. We prefer a product that fits better our needs to a product that could have other features that we are not going to use.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • When properly implemented, "BMC Footprints" can lead to "employee efficiency and better customer service"
  • It is a large and overwhelming tool, if the users are not trained properly and use it throughout their daily tasks.
  • Help Desk module is definitely well built and easy to work with
Read full review
ScreenShots

Back Screenshots

Screenshot of Manage requests in one intuitive platformScreenshot of Answer requests directly in the Back appScreenshot of Track the number of requests and the time spend