Bannersnack vs. Convert Experiences

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bannersnack
Score 1.4 out of 10
N/A
Bannersnack is a banner making technology from the company of the same name in San Francisco.N/A
Convert Experiences
Score 9.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Convert Experiences is an experimentation platform that offers the features & support you need to run A/B tests across multiple growth channels. Its enterprise-ready advanced features include full stack experimentation, multi-page testing, post-segmentation, targeting with 40+ filters, triggering tests based on data in other apps (data sources), complex goal tracking, and a secure API. Self-service pricing starts at $99 per month (for the Community Web plan). Includes…
$499
per month
Pricing
BannersnackConvert Experiences
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$499
per month
Growth
$999
per month
Expert
$1599
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BannersnackConvert Experiences
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—1. Annual contract or monthly payments available. 2. Pricing is not feature dependent. Some features like integrations, goals, Live Logs are necessary to test successfully. This is why Convert caps by unique tested users - basically visitors who have been bucketed to see a variation and are unique to that variation. As a result the app tested users are always </= the site's net traffic.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BannersnackConvert Experiences
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
BannersnackConvert Experiences
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Bannersnack
-
Ratings
Convert Experiences
9.1
11 Ratings
8% above category average
a/b experiment testing00 Ratings9.511 Ratings
Split URL testing00 Ratings10.010 Ratings
Multivariate testing00 Ratings9.011 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Cross-browser testing00 Ratings7.17 Ratings
Mobile app testing00 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Test significance00 Ratings10.011 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Advanced code editor00 Ratings9.510 Ratings
Page surveys00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Visitor recordings00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Preview mode00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
Test duration calculator00 Ratings7.46 Ratings
Experiment scheduler00 Ratings6.95 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Client-side tests00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Server-side tests00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Bannersnack
-
Ratings
Convert Experiences
9.5
11 Ratings
9% above category average
Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings10.010 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Traffic allocation control00 Ratings10.010 Ratings
Website personalization00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Bannersnack
-
Ratings
Convert Experiences
9.3
11 Ratings
9% above category average
Heatmap tool00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Click analytics00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Scroll maps00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Form fill analysis00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Conversion tracking00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Goal tracking00 Ratings9.510 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings9.59 Ratings
Results segmentation00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
CSV export00 Ratings9.24 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings10.09 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BannersnackConvert Experiences
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Contentsquare
Contentsquare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Contentsquare
Contentsquare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BannersnackConvert Experiences
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(1 ratings)
9.5
(18 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(9 ratings)
User Testimonials
BannersnackConvert Experiences
Likelihood to Recommend
Bannersnack
As on 2023, from my experience I do not recommend BannerSnack at all. They are sunsetting BannerSnack in favor of a new tool that does not meet my needs.
Read full review
Convert
Definitely well suited for budget conscious companies that want a solid array of functionality but without having to pay an exorbitant amount. Great for marketing and analytics team members that need the ability to get in and set up tests w/o dev assistance. But, functionality is there for developers to get in and set up more complicated tests.
Read full review
Pros
Bannersnack
  • Managing brand assets
  • Animated banners
  • Predesigned templates
Read full review
Convert
  • Over the top powerful Javascript enabled targeting. This feature is called DMP Profiling and is available in the Pro Plan, currently only +$100 more than the plus plan. An article explaining this feature is here for further reading: https://convert.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/206631623-Target-experiment-based-on-a-custom-Javascript-condition-that-evaluates-true-at-a-later-stage. I wrote up a much longer explanation but TR broke it up weirdly. The gist is that you can powerfully use JS to target. This allows me to target users in our SPA in incredibly advanced ways. I can walk their entire history model and assign them an audience value, or I can exclude them. It's MUCH more powerful than just a "Site Area" tool. We recently used it against 900K users to check if they had written a review of their apartment or not yet. This allowed me to only expose the user on the homepage to an experiment that prompted them to write a review while excluding users that couldn't write a review from the experiment (because they had already written one). The experiment converted 50% better than what we do now, generating 9k reviews in a matter of hours.
  • Audience targeting IN ADDITION to all that fancy DMP targeting. This means I can define demographics or other data as a qualifier AS WELL as the previously mentioned qualifier. This can be setup in so many ways: Traffic source, Visitor Data, Include / Exclude users part of a current experiment (!!), Date/Time, Device/Browser/OS, JS Conditon
  • Real-time reporting that makes sense to the whole company to view. Seriously, I can share a Convert Report to any level of intelligence on my team and they understand what's happening.
  • Audiences and Goals are saved as presets, so your entire team can use them. Using the example above, we have an audience called "Wrote a Review" that we exclude from the Review Prompt treatments.
  • Their customer support is seriously fast at answering questions. I've never had to wait more than a day.
Read full review
Cons
Bannersnack
  • Forget Creatopy! I still don't understand why Bannersnack is being sunset
  • More animation templates
  • Easier to share previews in html5
Read full review
Convert
  • We are aggressive testers and have demanding clients, and if there was any part of the Convert platform where I'd like to see improvement, it would be in the reporting section where I feel a vertical report could present in a more readable fashion to the users.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Bannersnack
No answers on this topic
Convert
Couldn't live without this, no other tool does precisely what we need them to do
Read full review
Usability
Bannersnack
No answers on this topic
Convert
To use the platform in the context of developing enhanced tests that stretch the platform there is as with most things a learning curve. However, if you're a casual user or have standard experiments that you wish to run you would be easily able to hit the ground running.
Read full review
Support Rating
Bannersnack
No answers on this topic
Convert
I use support only in very emergency cases. The support hasn't been very helpful and suggests the problem is on my site
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bannersnack
In my opinion Canva > Bannersnack as of 2023. The features in BannerSnack are very similar to Canva, but long term they appear to be shutting down BannerSnack entirely.
Read full review
Convert
Convert was selected based on price point, feature set, and UI/UX. All three are very friendly to new testers and small to mid-market size companies. Their UI and tool workflow is the best out of all of the non-enterprise solutions that I have tried. There is some small room for improvement, but that only really affects power users or tests that require significant coding/development work to execute.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Bannersnack
  • Ease of use makes it possible for non-designers to create banner ads
  • Speed of modifying templates to my use case = savings!
Read full review
Convert
  • Using Convert has allowed us to make quick decisions on site edits and price changes. Seeing and sharing quick results makes our operations much more profitable.
  • Connecting the tests with Shopify has produced very valuable and timely results that we can act upon as soon as we see statistically significant results.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Convert Experiences Screenshots

Screenshot of Stack conditions to build complex goals that can track (almost) any visitor action to determine the test outcome.Screenshot of Granular targeting so only the right people view variations. 40+ conditions included.Screenshot of An API brings Convert's capabilities to a testing ecosystem.Screenshot of Experiment reports that can be shared with stakeholders and on social media.Screenshot of Several advanced test types that are available, including multipage (funnel) experiments.Screenshot of Full-stack experimentation that can be used to run tests anywhere that Convert code can be deployed.