BitSight Security Ratings vs. SAI360

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BitSight Security Ratings
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
BitSight in Cambridge, Massachusetts offers an Internet security platform.N/A
SAI360
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SAI360 merges GRC software and Ethics & Compliance Learning to enhance risk management. Its scalable solutions have supported global organizations for 25+ years.N/A
Pricing
BitSight Security RatingsSAI360
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BitSight Security RatingsSAI360
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BitSight Security RatingsSAI360
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
BitSight Security RatingsSAI360
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
BitSight Security Ratings
-
Ratings
SAI360
7.7
3 Ratings
2% above category average
Common repository of GRC items00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Risk management00 Ratings7.33 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
GRC policy management00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Incident management00 Ratings7.33 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BitSight Security RatingsSAI360
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Rencore Code (SPCAF)
Rencore Code (SPCAF)
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Ariba
SAP Ariba
Score 7.9 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 7.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BitSight Security RatingsSAI360
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(1 ratings)
7.3
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BitSight Security RatingsSAI360
Likelihood to Recommend
Bitsight Technologies
If you are considering BitSight Security Ratings as a portion or bulk of a larger vendor management project you will be well served in letting the risk scores be an indication of how closely you need to examine a vendor. However, you should not base your assessment solely on the risk score provided. The risk score is based on publicly available data and can be inaccurate.
Read full review
SAI Global
The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.
Read full review
Pros
Bitsight Technologies
  • Security hygiene tracking over time
  • Understandable risk score based on observations
  • Predictability model of potential cyber security issues based on security habits.
Read full review
SAI Global
  • Customized unified design platform
  • Modules that fit your organization
  • Low technology involvement with information department.
  • Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
  • Single sign-on web-based applications
Read full review
Cons
Bitsight Technologies
  • Since data is based on public registration IP and domain data can be stale depending on ISP/Domain registration update delays.
  • Correcting a false detection is a month-long endeavor and requires the company with the impacted score to clean up BitSight's data.
  • Customer service for incorrect data is convoluted and requires a deep understanding of domain registration to correct the data. The responsibility for correcting data is placed solely on the customer's shoulders.
Read full review
SAI Global
  • Reporting
  • Legacy modules (i.e. tasks)
  • Look and feel
  • Intuitive UI
Read full review
Usability
Bitsight Technologies
No answers on this topic
SAI Global
Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bitsight Technologies
BitSight Security Ratings ranks evenly with SecurityScorecard and both below OneTrust for our use case. We needed a platform that would let us define risk for our organization and weight scores differently based on data sensitivity. BitSight and SecurityScorecard are aggregate data that can provide insight into the security habits of a potential vendor and should be considered as an addition to most vendor management projects. However, they both provide metrics based on hygiene and not on data-defined risk. In concert with a platform to evaluate risk based on data and to inform the overall evaluation of a vendor, BitSight Security Ratings can be made to shine. Just understand that you may have to validate some data.
Read full review
SAI Global
Archer was very similar to SAI360 in cost and features. Has a more modern look and feel and more task functionality. The price point was very similar. Didn't choose them as our existing usage is in an On-Prem version and support from our in-house IT team was not able to be obtained. MetricStream was very modern looking with an intuitive UI. Appeared to have all the features with a number of additional bells and whistles. The price point was far above our budget and we could not get approval to move them to the RFP.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Bitsight Technologies
  • Wasted resource hours cleaning up data to correct erroneous risk score.
  • Extra time spent addressing calls from clients about erroneous risk score data.
  • Extra time validating risk score provided by BitSight Security Ratings for potential vendors to ensure valid data.
Read full review
SAI Global
  • The system is costly for the initial setup
  • Does help to mitigate risk and keep the vendors and internal departments from becoming non-compliant.
  • One license for all users
  • Easy to manage employee's security access
Read full review
ScreenShots