BlackBerry UEM vs. Panda Patch Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Blackberry UEM
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
BlackBerry UEM (formerly from Good Technology) offers a complete enterprise mobility management solution, including capabilities for mobile device management, mobile application management, mobile content management, identity access management and mobile security and containerization.N/A
Panda Patch Management
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Panda Security provides Panda Patch Management, a patching and vulnerability management solution.N/A
Pricing
BlackBerry UEMPanda Patch Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Blackberry UEMPanda Patch Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlackBerry UEMPanda Patch Management
Considered Both Products
Blackberry UEM
Chose Blackberry UEM
When I compared Black BerryUEM (formerly Good) with MaaS360 and AirWatch at the time, BlackBerry UEM (formerly Good) offered better integration into the network as well as better mobile clients to execute work. Access to 3rd party apps that can be used e.g., ability to …
Chose Blackberry UEM
Well, selecting Good was an organization level decision and not my personal one. I like Good from the security perspective and that it helps our IT department avoid worrying about data theft. Otherwise, from the perspective of user convenience, Outlook scores way over Good with …
Panda Patch Management
Chose Panda Patch Management
Panda features a faster, more intuitive management console with settings that are easy for network administrators to understand, thereby enabling them to utilize the tool's full range of capabilities. Panda also consumes significantly less RAM, in contrast to the high memory …
Features
BlackBerry UEMPanda Patch Management
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
BlackBerry UEM
-
Ratings
Panda Patch Management
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
BlackBerry UEM
-
Ratings
Panda Patch Management
8.8
Ratings
7% above category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Authentication00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Web Scanning00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BlackBerry UEMPanda Patch Management
Small Businesses
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BlackBerry UEMPanda Patch Management
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
4.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BlackBerry UEMPanda Patch Management
Likelihood to Recommend
BlackBerry UEM is well-suited if you are looking for an all-in-one mobile security management platform. From the initial rollout and install of the software onto a device, to the deactivation and removal off the network, it works well and is easy to maintain. The one area where it could still use improvement is working with iOS devices, due to the non-native app functionality.
Read full review
Perfect for medium-to-large enterprises where endpoint management becomes complex, the tool helps maintain security and monitor issues detected on workstations and/or threats via the web, USB, etc. I do not recommend this tool for small businesses, however, due to its high annual licensing cost—an aspect of the product that could stand to be improved.
Read full review
Pros
  • Separates your mobile device into a personal and work environments
  • It does not allow corporate data to be accessed by social media or other 3rd party apps like Facebook and WhatsApp unless specified.
  • It allows a company to securely expand the services offered within its network to mobile devices.
Read full review
  • Control of removable devices, Bluetooth, and others.
  • Web access control.
  • Real-time threat detection.
Read full review
Cons
  • Licensing costs could be streamlined and easier to manage
  • Functionality could be improved with iOS devices
Read full review
  • Schedule patch application times.
  • Manage Windows updates.
  • Manage computer drivers, allowing for their removal.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
If given a choice, I would like to access office emails directly using Microsoft Exchange. Entering login passwords every five minutes seems painful and syncing of emails is not done in real time.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
I believe the tool could be improved by adding additional features—particularly for operating system update management, such as the ability to create management groups—thereby centralizing all patch management in a single console and enhancing agility and security for workstations. It could also include a dashboard to notify users of new patches, centralize news about critical software patches, and so on.
Read full review
Support Rating
If you have a serious issue with your on-premise installation, access to support can take a bit to get someone on the phone, and it can take some time to rectify, given the complexity of the software. In my experience, the support team does get you back up and running in critical scenarios, but you more than likely will be on some marathon calls, unless it is a very simple and known issue.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
When I compared Black BerryUEM (formerly Good) with MaaS360 and AirWatch at the time, BlackBerry UEM (formerly Good) offered better integration into the network as well as better mobile clients to execute work. Access to 3rd party apps that can be used e.g., ability to synchronize and edit notes. This, however, may have changed in recent years.
Read full review
Panda features a faster, more intuitive management console with settings that are easy for network administrators to understand, thereby enabling them to utilize the tool's full range of capabilities. Panda also consumes significantly less RAM, in contrast to the high memory usage associated with Trend on desktops.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Increased employee efficiency because email and calendar data is accessible anytime, anywhere
  • Possibility for missed emails or late replies over a period of time because the app does not automatically refresh on a normal schedule
Read full review
  • Avoid/reduce production stoppages due to station unavailability.
  • Control internal web access, improving internet usage management.
  • By anticipating shutdowns caused by threats, you are indirectly contributing to the company's ROI.
Read full review
ScreenShots