BlockSurvey helps people run sensitive surveys. It's end-to-end encrypted. Presented is a solution like SIGNAL, for forms & Surveys. No ads, no trackers. BlockSurvey is designed to help protect respondents' privacy. It's built on Stacks blockchain, which is powered by Bitcoin.
$100
per month per user
Emptoris
Score 5.5 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$59
Per User Per Month
Pricing
BlockSurvey
Emptoris
Editions & Modules
Enterprise Plans
$100
per month per user
Emptoris
$59.00
Per User Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlockSurvey
Emptoris
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlockSurvey
Emptoris
Considered Both Products
BlockSurvey
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlockSurvey
I want to choose one software which can useful in data collection from my team with minimal efforts of mine and my team. Also I don't want to play with security and privacy of my teammates which giving thoughts and ideas. BlockSurvey provided me that requirement with good …
Emptoris is very similar in functionality but more simple than the other tools I have used in the past. Some of its modules have been upgraded very well recently which helps it compete better with its rivals. We recently conducted an exercise to see if we need to move to some …
Ability to handle high volume of contracts; configurability and customization of fields; scalability for large number of users; ability to handle lengthy contracts with many fields & variables; organization and role-based security; ability to maintain on our own servers instead …
I would say there are positives and negatives to all. Emptoris seemed to be more advanced in progression of their tool. Others seem to have created a tool to meet a customers need and was not part of their core business model or competency.
Emptoris had better functionality but was definitely less user friendly. Still, the small center-led team was quite experienced so Emptoris was a better choice.
I think Emptoris stands up better against peers in terms of point A to Z solution: Better storage of all components related to the contract (contract management) in terms of all legal requirements, all compliance requirements, proper communication trail, various attachments, …
We eventually selected Apttus because of its close ties to Salesforce and quick implementation process. We were able to get the application installed and live in just a few weeks. For our purposes, it was a much better fit for us to generate and store contracts for our company …
There are quite few products for contracts management, there are pro and cons of every product software.However, Emptoris has won the race due to the features and the easy maintenance of contracts compared to Ariba,Oracle contract management product software.
I am a fan of Ariba to be used for the entire lifecycle of Sourcing. From RFX's to cutting PO's. I feel Emptoris misses the boat on the idea of a "One Stop Shop" for all of your Sourcing/Purchasing needs
As i have used this for taking ideas and thoughts of experience persons for new launch of any process or technique in my organization. Team is not feeling any challenge to share their views on my new developments. It can be use in this . But if any one wants to use as live pole than they should choose another
Any company who needs more monitoring and has frequent contract language changes due to negotiations with parties can utilize the Emptoris Contracts software to a greater extent. Key Business Questions that are answered on Emptoris:
More clause language.
Multiple language support
Maintenance of the contracts during the life cycle.
Bringing Legacy contracts into new system and its maintenance.
Monitoring the contract and important remainders based on contract.
Complex contract approval process due to the business complexity.
User roles and responsibilities - Privileges.
Version comparison difficulties.
Many more.. There are good amount of features on Emptoris that can be used, which improves the business process cycle times.
There are a lot of new, exciting products coming out in every field and I believe that there is always something better right over the horizon. If it was my choice, I would review my usage of Emptoris and other software periodically to make sure I'm using the most efficient software possible.
Because of features provided by block survey is above par level and excellent user experience for even new joined person on that software. I didn't get any complaint against this software from my teammates which data collection with help of BlockSurvey. That is the main reason i have given above rating
One can not deny that fact is block survey is best in their market segment which provides best solutions for all data collection enthusiastic people and idea sharing people. One can easily collect data from anonymous person to know their view on any subject or topic. that's why given this rating
The above rating for the overall support from Emptoris is for their product / product support, roll out training and refresher training / ongoing training, which is not only good but superior. There is no major or reconizable bad review that can be given to Emptoris at this point in time, from where is stands.
I want to choose one software which can useful in data collection from my team with minimal efforts of mine and my team. Also I don't want to play with security and privacy of my teammates which giving thoughts and ideas. BlockSurvey provided me that requirement with good experience. So i chose it
We eventually selected Apttus because of its close ties to Salesforce and quick implementation process. We were able to get the application installed and live in just a few weeks. For our purposes, it was a much better fit for us to generate and store contracts for our company without having to force a link to procurement.
We won the 2005 Baseline Magazine Award for best ROI related to a technology implementation with an ROI 5544% (see 2005 Baseline ROI Awards, GlaxoSmithkline).
We always felt we could do "two times the work, with half the people and deliver double the savings".