Bloomberg Law is a legal research and analytics tool, from Bloomberg.
N/A
Thomson Reuters Westlaw
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Westlaw, now supported by Thomson Reuters is a legal research software and database, emphasizing access to a breadth of case law.
$115
per month
Pricing
Bloomberg Law
Thomson Reuters Westlaw
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Westlaw Edge Single State Essentials
$115.00
per month
Westlaw Edge Single State Primary Law
$183.20
per month
Westlaw Edge Single State Primary Law
$237.00
per month
Westlaw Edge All States Primary Law
$249.60
per month
Westlaw Edge All States and Federal Primary Law
$315.20
per month
Westlaw Edge Single State Primary Law and Analytical
$404.00
per month
Westlaw Edge Premium
$582.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bloomberg Law
Thomson Reuters Westlaw
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bloomberg Law
Thomson Reuters Westlaw
Considered Both Products
Bloomberg Law
No answer on this topic
Thomson Reuters Westlaw
Verified User
Contributor
Chose Thomson Reuters Westlaw
We considered switching to Bloomberg Law because of the contractual provisions with Westlaw but ultimately decided to stay. The cost of getting out of the contract term was cost-prohibitive and left us with no choice.
It's best suited for in-house counsel that wishes to stay on top of recent case law and labor decisions. It's also great for labor & employment attorneys working at firms to have a high level overview of key issues. The chart builder and Daily Labor Report are the best resources for in-house counsel. The content is easy to flip to in-house client teams and department heads along with individual analysis and suggested action items.
Perhaps well-suited in enterprise agreements where many users need access to many areas, and a giant contract is cost effective. This was a good company to work with as a student and instructor where value was not my specific concern. I cannot speak to the value paid by the responsible party in that context.
The program logs me off rather quickly when I have a window open stagnant on Practical Law. As I don't believe Practical Law bills per minute of use, I wish it would stay open longer.
Most of the corporate forms are still unavailable or not maintained in all 50 states. Would love to see practicioners like myself used as resources to get those updated and current.
The specific product ordered was fine, but it was far too easy to mindlessly incur ancillary charges without warning. This is much less user friendly than other, similar providers of services such as LexisNexis. The Thomson Reuters Westlaw experience is not intuitive when compared to other, similar providers and ended up being less cost effective.
I was passed around like a hot potato and nameless responders were somewhat disrespectful and "snippy." There was no offer to resolve the issue I complained about, and I was basically made to feel as though I was lying about the problem. The solution was easy: fix my customized home screen to remove the possibility of wandering into a non-subscription area. This fix was never offered or pursued. Instead, I was offered the option of signing up for additional services.
Like I said earlier, I previously used Lexis as the legal research tool. I did like Lexis because it was very easy to navigate, and you were able to utilize their Shepherds tool for case citations. However, I felt that their bank or library of cases, legal standards or precedents, and providing the user with the quality of case law needed was subpar. [Thomson Reuters] Westlaw far exceeds [its] competitors when it comes to the necessary elements needed for legal practice/research.
Accident report does not have auto insurance information, but [Thomson Reuters] Westlaw was able to locate information needed to make sure a client's injuries were taken care of
Case Citations in response to defendants' motions in trial citing decisions that are against our clients