BMC AMI Ops vs. IBM OMEGAMON

BMC AMI ops monitors the environment and environment components very well. Db2, zOS, CICS, etc. It is not immediately helpful for understanding the application context. Of course, that is not magic. The end-user (me) must know what they are doing, what the userids are and whatnot ,and how to relate to informal application names

Incentivized

Certainly, the tool is useful for debugging applications and for real-time monitoring. It's a bit less useful, not to say useless when applications are client servers. We have used it heavily above all to optimize the DB/2 applications. We managed to reduce the need for additional MIPS year by year.

Incentivized

• Monitor the health of the system. Alert when the threshold is met such as CPU DASD I/O MVS Storage
• Does a very good job with IMS Reporting and threshold notification. region Looping, high CPU
• Java region Gabbage collection reporting work great with IBM Health center.

Incentivized

• reliability
• strength
• effectiveness

Incentivized

• Going back in history must be improved, its not that flexible.
• The current interval in the z OS panel is 1 minute. However, the backward details show 15 15-minute intervals, which is not helpful.
• The job delay reason column should include a more exact reason instead of a general statement.

Incentivized

• it itself consumes cpu
• the interface is not user-friendly
• every release migration is a surprise

Incentivized

Because of the overall feature set is has. However I feel there is some room for improvement especially in documentation and wider API integration

Incentivized

BMC AMI Cloud and Data provides a data resiliency solution for the cloud. It is for customers looking to 1. backup their decades-worth of data stored in physical or virtual tapes to Cloud storage (AWS S3), 2. perform analytics and business intelligence to run targeted customers or campaigns on mainframe data now available in the cloud, and 3. use the data as backup/ restore copies in the event of a disaster.

Incentivized

Naturally, during the software selection, other tools from other similar vendors were compared as functionalities. more benchmarks have been made to control the Omegamon overhead on applications. certainly, it has influenced the fact that the mainframe base software is IBM and Omegamon is IBM so the compatibility problems are automatically solved.

Incentivized

• Negative: Not effective use of archive data for historical displays, it takes much time and hangs.
• Negative: The installation method through the installer is not friendly.
• Positive: CICS issues can be identified, diagnosed and fixed promptly.
• Negative: Applying passcodes is more difficult than desired.

Incentivized

• the baseline of mips under control
• mic invoice flat
• immediately resolve problems

Incentivized