Bryntum vs. Progress Telerik

Bryntum

Bryntum

0 Reviews and Ratings

Progress Telerik

Progress Telerik

77 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Bryntum	Score 0.0 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Bryntum provides enterprise-grade JavaScript components and tools designed to streamline project management and resource scheduling for modern web applications. Its product suite enables development teams to implement Gantt charts, interactive schedulers, and Kanban boards. By integrating Bryntum’s UI components, organizations can manage dependencies, allocate resources more efficiently, and gain real-time visibility into project timelines, while reducing the overhead typically associated…	$850 one-time fee per seat
Progress Telerik	Score 9.4 out of 10	N/A	With Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins and customization options, Telerik users report cutting development time by up to 50 percent. Web	$999 per developer, royalty-free

Pricing

Bryntum

Progress Telerik

Editions & Modules

EUL license: $850
one-time fee per seat
OEM License: $5,150
per year

Individual Product Licence: $999
per developer, royalty-free
DevCraft UI: $1,299
per developer, royalty-free
DevCraft Complete: $1,499
per developer, royalty-free
DevCraft Ultimate: $2,199
per developer, royalty-free

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Bryntum	Progress Telerik
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Bryntum	Progress Telerik
Considered Both Products	Bryntum No answer on this topic	Progress Telerik Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress Telerik We didn't use SyncFusion for long. We found that if you did anything custom, the controls simply didn't behave the way you would expect. Very annoying for us. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress Telerik I found Progress Telerik components easier to use than others. Incentivized Helpful? MK Mehrzad Khoddam Sr. Software Developer Chose Progress Telerik Progress Telerik provides mor API options for each component. Also, the documentation is easier to read and search. Incentivized Helpful? Eric Johansson Senior Developer Chose Progress Telerik While the more expensive to use for a small shop(for example syncfusion is free to start), the quality paid for itself in no time flat. Other options are either half baked, have lock in and will become quite expensive once you hit a treshhold, or plain simply didn't mesh with … Incentivized Helpful? JC Jeff Chesney Director Projects and Development Chose Progress Telerik The Telerik controls were just easier for us to use and implement. Our evaluation of control packages was over 9 years ago, so it is hard to recall the major differences. Generally, the team preferred what Telerik had to offer, particularly the fact that the bundle provided … Incentivized Helpful? JW Joshua Weeks Lead Software Engineer Chose Progress Telerik Progress Telerik UI provides a large amount of language support, demos, and documentation. While the competition is still great in their own right, Progress Telerik UI has provided enough resources to cover a number of current and future projects without having to expand to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress Telerik Telerik UI for Blazor is much more usable than Kendo UI. I was never a fan of Kendo UI, but I like using Telerik UI For Blazor due to the ease of implementation for the components. Incentivized Helpful? Rob Barker Software Development Manager Chose Progress Telerik Progress Telerik UI is the most complete multi-framework/platform in existence. Without it, you will find yourself having to traverse half a dozen other component providers each with varying degrees of license requirements and update schedules. Sure you might find a single … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress Telerik I purchased Telerik because its components seemed great and were priced more attractively than Syncfusion. Unfortunately, after hitting major product limitations with Telerik's Document Processing for PDF I now find myself migrating from Telerik to Syncfusion. This has been an … Incentivized Helpful? SP Shivani Pandey Project Engineer Chose Progress Telerik Shopify Plus Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress Telerik Rapid development and easy integration with applications. Incentivized Helpful? Doug Thompson Full Stack Senior Developer Chose Progress Telerik Telerik Support (pre-progress) is awesome, way better than Infragistics or Syncfusion. Syncfusion is a little cheaper. They all have Grid components (like Excel) then there are a few edge cases of having different controls to another to show off. Once you know what UI tech you … Incentivized Helpful? Joshua Garrison Software Engineer Chose Progress Telerik I have tried another library called JqWidgets. Telerik makes setting up UI elements much easier than JqWidgets. It is better documented as well. Incentivized Helpful? RM Rich Moll Senior Software Engineer Chose Progress Telerik [Progress Telerik UI] had a specific set of controls that were suited directly to our application space. Telerik also provided a Xamarin solution for very similar pricing, which should allow us to speed up our app development. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress Telerik Progress Telerik UI ultimately had the smoothest/lowest learning curve for developers and it's an established product that incoming team members likely have some experience with. Incentivized Helpful? Gary Davis Director Chose Progress Telerik The existing Microsoft technologies already support many of the controls provided by Progress Telerik UI and may be used as an alternative, of course. They will not have the full-featured functionality you will find in Progress Telerik UI but are available. There are also other … Incentivized Helpful? DK derek kelly Sr Developer Chose Progress Telerik Using Progress Telerik UI on the front end and Spring on the back end, you can focus on your business logic in the middle. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. This allows you to focus on what's under the hood. These have both been a pleasure to work with. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress Telerik We have been implementing our own custom code using the ASP.NET framework, and it has taken us a lot longer to implement functionality. When we transitioned to using Progress Telerik UI components, it exponentially sped up our development time and improved the look of our … Incentivized Helpful? SB Souvik Bera Software Engineer Chose Progress Telerik None. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress Telerik With Progress Telerik UI, didn't really look for alternatives. Incentivized Helpful? Abhay Gandhi Senior Manager Chose Progress Telerik Nothing else other than Telerik. Incentivized Helpful? Jyoti Mohite Software Engineer II Chose Progress Telerik We have not used any other product for UI. We are using Telerik from start and continuing using it. Features offered by Telerik are sufficient for our product and we are fully utilizing all features provided by Telerik. Performance of all UI controls are great so over all … Incentivized Helpful? AK Akshata Khandeparkar Software Engineer 2 Chose Progress Telerik Super easy to use and integrate into Visual Studio. The MVC helpers greatly simplify development. The controls are easy to implement and the online examples are excellent. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress Telerik We are using DevExpress for reporting, which has a way better reporting and report template creation mechanism. Incentivized Helpful? DG Dustin Gibson Software Developer III Chose Progress Telerik I am much more pleased with what we've gotten from Telerik UI in terms of controls and ease of use. The controls have great functionality and were easy to integrate into what we are wanting to accomplish. DevExpress never wowed us and that's why we went with Progress and have … Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Bryntum	Progress Telerik
Small Businesses	Syncfusion Essential Studio Score 7.0 out of 10	Syncfusion Essential Studio Score 7.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	React (React.js) Score 8.9 out of 10	React (React.js) Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises	React (React.js) Score 8.9 out of 10	React (React.js) Score 8.9 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Bryntum	Progress Telerik
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.3 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.3 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Bryntum	Progress Telerik
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	Progress Telerik UI is one of the best web design and development solutions for Dot Net based applications. It has extensible support for ASP.NET Core, C#, WCF, and ASP.NET WebForms. It overall improves the design structure for the applications and provides multiple customization options to meet the requirements of clients and end-users. Incentivized SP Shivani Pandey Project Engineer Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Telerik enables rapid application development for the demonstration of concepts. It provides a good set of themes and functional additions to a UI development environment. Each control is packed with valuable features. The support team is responsive and very knowledgeable about making their product work in whatever situation you need. Incentivized RM Rich Moll Senior Software Engineer Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	I have not worked with the App Builder but I think a GUI for dragging and dropping components to build a web page would be great. In addition to the app builder there should some tools to design a responsive web application to see the results for different screen sizes. Incentivized MK Mehrzad Khoddam Sr. Software Developer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	No answers on this topic	The Telerik UI has become part of our staple development tools. We can not be as productive without the feature set available to us in the Telerik UI ASP.NET AJAX control package. JC Jeff Chesney Director Projects and Development Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	The UX of their UI is very well thought out, the micro-interactions are intuitive - thus great for your end user as less training is needed. Using the software, there [are] loads to get you going, you can download their whole demo site and see how each demo works. There is more now on github to get you started, also much on an awesome CDN that's well bedded in so your app is speedy and up to date. Doug Thompson Full Stack Senior Developer Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Progress Telerik UI customer support is pretty good. The ticketing system allows a thread of questions, answers, and attachments of code and screenshots. Response time is fairly quick and often has code snippets or pointers to online examples that could be relevant. There is a large amount of community support forums to get answers or post questions. In addition there is a forum of posted code samples for the various controls. The Progress update tool easily tells you what products have been updated and allows you to install the updates on your development system. Release notes can be displayed to see what's new. Incentivized Gary Davis Director Read full review
Implementation Rating	No answers on this topic	The controls work very well as long as they are used as intended. Built-in functionality should be used whenever possible, Incentivized BW Bill Weston IT Systems Development Manager Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	The Telerik controls were just easier for us to use and implement. Our evaluation of control packages was over 9 years ago, so it is hard to recall the major differences. Generally, the team preferred what Telerik had to offer, particularly the fact that the bundle provided controls, not just for the ASP.NET context, but also Windows applications, and the cross-platform contexts as well. JC Jeff Chesney Director Projects and Development Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Provides rapid development - it has helped me create multiple web applications in MVC and Angular within a one-month time frame. Our clients were facing challenges (taking time to load applications, grid view, and generating reports ) with asp.net web applications. Using Kendo UI we have migrated the ASP.NET application to MVC within a one-month time frame. The client was very happy with the application's performance and responsive UI. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Bryntum Screenshots	Progress Telerik Screenshots