Bryntum vs. Progress Telerik
Bryntum vs. Progress Telerik
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bryntum | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Bryntum provides enterprise-grade JavaScript components and tools designed to streamline project management and resource scheduling for modern web applications. Its product suite enables development teams to implement Gantt charts, interactive schedulers, and Kanban boards. By integrating Bryntum’s UI components, organizations can manage dependencies, allocate resources more efficiently, and gain real-time visibility into project timelines, while reducing the overhead typically associated… | $850 one-time fee per seat | |
Progress Telerik | N/A | With Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins and customization options, Telerik users report cutting development time by up to 50 percent. Web | $999 per developer, royalty-free |
| Bryntum | Progress Telerik | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Bryntum | Progress Telerik |
|---|
| Bryntum | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | React (React.js) Score 8.8 out of 10 | React (React.js) Score 8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | React (React.js) Score 8.8 out of 10 | React (React.js) Score 8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | React (React.js) Score 8.8 out of 10 | React (React.js) Score 8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Bryntum | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 9.4 (44 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (5 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (30 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.3 (28 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (3 ratings) |
| Bryntum | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | Bryntum No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Pros | Bryntum No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Cons | Bryntum No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Likelihood to Renew | Bryntum No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Usability | Bryntum No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Support Rating | Bryntum No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Implementation Rating | Bryntum No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Alternatives Considered | Bryntum No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Return on Investment | Bryntum No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| ScreenShots | Bryntum Screenshots | Progress Telerik Screenshots |











