Using Progress Telerik and Kendo UI for faster and more professional software development
Overall Satisfaction with Progress Telerik
We have different web applications that use grids, forms , and schedulers. Using Progress Telerik components, we simply used grids with templated, and a very good looking scheduler with many useful features. Communication of component with the backend using data source features are simple. In addition to these components we used cards and graphs as well.
Pros
- Scheduler with the capability of changing time zone
- Using grids with templates
- Using a large number of smaller controls including dropdown lists
Cons
- I have not worked with the App Builder but I think a GUI for dragging and dropping components to build a web page would be great.
- In addition to the app builder there should some tools to design a responsive web application to see the results for different screen sizes.
- The development time went shorter
- Good looking web application that attracts users
- Syncfusion® Essential Studio®
Progress Telerik provides mor API options for each component. Also, the documentation is easier to read and search.
Do you think Progress Telerik delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Progress Telerik's feature set?
Yes
Did Progress Telerik live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Progress Telerik go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Progress Telerik again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation