BugTracker.net vs. Kure

See above. Recommended questions: What type of feedback or tracking will we be doing? Will this need to be client-facing? How will we track content edits? How many users will be assigned to issues in a given project?

Incentivized

Kure walks you through every step of a project with helpful tips for each question and you never get lost or confused. Great on your 1st project or your 100th. I like it for my quick win, small, and medium-sized projects.

• Ability to split our multiple projects and assign a user base.
• Ability to set permissions based on user base/ roles.
• Customization of fields on a project level.

Incentivized

• Project management guidance and solutions
• Team collaboration to streamline processes
• Provide useful information to a variety of companies

• User interface for client-facing feedback
• Content and design updates tracking

Incentivized

• I’d like to see an RCA option for Safety Professionals
• Have demo cases to watch to see what data is needed and how each function works.
• Utilize VR boardrooms to conduct updates in VR

I would plan on renewing and staying with BugTracker.net simply because it is a no nonsense easy to use tool. Once you get it set up and understand the small nuances with this custom piece of software, it really is a great tool to help your organization get started with Defect Management and BugTracking without having to drop several thousands of dollars on tools that are more fluff than function.

Incentivized

I didn't choose the product or evaluate other options, but I've been satisified with it except for tracking content changes.

Incentivized

I don't have anything that I'm willing to share.

• Decreased turn around time for defect fixes.
• Smoother builder deploys
• Clearer communication from QA to Dev Team

Incentivized

• Improved communication
• Standardized projects
• Create business case for investment