CA Workload Automation vs. Cybereason Defense Platform vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security

CA Workload Automation is well suited for firms having to manage and monitor multiple applications operating in multiple environments. and having SLA requirements. CA Workload Automation is less appropriate and not cost-effective for non-critical applications and/or jobs. CA Workload Automation is ideal for companies that require reliable and stable Production support for their business critical jobs to finish on time.

Incentivized

I'd recommend Cybereason due to it's efficacy, low TCO, low false/positive rate. The product was easy to implement and maintain. One of the major advantages of using Cybereason is that it requires minimal training for level 1 users to use the tool.

Incentivized

Suitable scenario: The McAfee Cloud Workload Security console has helped me a lot in saving physical resources. We no longer have to have a server and spend resources to maintain the console, everything is in the cloud. Unsuitable scenario: After the change to the cloud the McAfee Cloud Workload Security reduced many things that were made very easy when it was on a physical server. Active directory server integration with the console is a bit tricky. That should be improved and be somewhat more friendly when connecting to be able to migrate user machines.

Incentivized

• All batch jobs can be monitored from one dashboard.
• Provides detailed error logs.
• We have developed packages to invoke OIC integrations through Autosys.
• Notifications is a good feature when job fails or runs beyond cutoff time.

Incentivized

• EDR
• Forensics
• Mitigation
• Response

Incentivized

• Monitoring of detected threats
• Checking the status of antivirus agents
• Monitoring of antivirus software installed

Incentivized

• Monitoring of front-end websites.
• More utilization insights if possible.
• Customer service via chat in the future if possible.

Incentivized

• Slow support
• Bugs on their interface
• Log extraction

Incentivized

• Improve integration with windows server active directory.
• The monitoring of the implementation of missing components of the antivirus should be improved.

Incentivized

This product along with the Broadcom support team fits out needs and scheduling requirements with no issues. The support team are very aware of their product and how to support it.

Incentivized

I love this product!!

Incentivized

We selected CA Workload Automation for the ease of integration and less time to setup. It has less overhead to manage the application and is a very robust application.

Incentivized

Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.

Incentivized

We use McAfee Endpoint Security on user PCs and I must say that it is an excellent antivirus. The alerts we have had have been resolved without any problem. I totally recommend it.

Incentivized

• CA Workload Automation has improved SLA by 50%.
• CA Workload Automation has reduced job failures by 60%.
• CA Workload Automation has improved staff productivity and problem resolution.
• CA Workload Automation has improved application availability.

Incentivized

• Helps on threat hunting
• MalOps is very good
• When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond

Incentivized

• Improved resource savings in terms of physical infrastructure.

Incentivized