TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Camunda

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ACamunda is a process orchestration tool designed to help organizations design, automate, and improve any process. Built for business and IT collaboration using BPMN and DMN standards, Camunda aims to enable seamless integration across endpoints to transform mission-critical processes.N/A

    Microsoft BizTalk

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    CamundaMicrosoft BizTalk
    Editions & Modules
    Self-Managed Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    per year
    SaaS Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    per year
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CamundaMicrosoft BizTalk
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CamundaMicrosoft BizTalk
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of Camunda and Microsoft BizTalk Server
    Feature
    Camunda
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Microsoft BizTalk Server
    -
    Ratings
    API for custom integration9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Camunda and Microsoft BizTalk Server
    Feature
    Camunda
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Microsoft BizTalk Server
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of Camunda and Microsoft BizTalk Server
    Feature
    Camunda
    8.5
    2 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Microsoft BizTalk Server
    -
    Ratings
    Process designer9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process simulation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business rules engine7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    SOA support9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process player9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form builder5.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model execution10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business Process Automation
    Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Camunda and Microsoft BizTalk Server
    Feature
    Camunda
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    27% above category average
    Microsoft BizTalk Server
    -
    Ratings
    Business Process Modeling9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Decision Modeling9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CamundaMicrosoft BizTalk
    Small Businesses
    Bizagi
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    Apache Camel
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CamundaMicrosoft BizTalk
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.0
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CamundaMicrosoft BizTalk
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Camunda
    Camunda Platform is well suited for scenarios where there are different stages in a business flow and the flow is driven by user action at each stage. For example placing of an order on an ecommerce platform. Depending on whether user was able to make the payment or not the workflow would go to dispatch or retry stage. Now the retry stage would trigger further actions like sending follow up emails etc. Likewise, dispatch stage would have a different set of actions. Since every order is important and we need to know where it stands, using Camunda Platform is imperative. Camunda Platform might not be a right choice where just a one off thing needs to be done. For example, uploading of product information by user or periodic processing of heavy images by a worker. These are all either one step processes or periodic automated processes where we can track the status without using a business modeler like Camunda Platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    BizTalk is well suited as middleware. Where you wish to translate an input file into an output file and send it to some endpoint. In our case, we used it to convert and send files to SAP. In many ways, it very flexible, and you can do almost anything you want with it. In many ways, it's a better solution than your SAP XI or PI as middleware, since it's much less expensive, and allows you do interface with non-SAP systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Camunda
    • Asynchronous functionality of Camunda Platform and different types of gateways.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • It is very user friendly. Users can change rules during run time and change workflow.
    • Huge capacity for queueing messages. It supports all types of adapters like Oracle, Salesforce, SMTP, FTP, etc. Also users can built custom adaptors.
    • If users want to dynamically deploy their solution without any downtime, this is a perfect solution. BizTalk will be a good fit, especially for public-facing websites.
    • Well-proven in the market. I used it when developing a website for Virgin Trains, catering more than 800K user requests per day.
    • Helps in load balancing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Camunda
    • Camunda expects that you will develop your own user interfaces. This is either a benefit or a barrier depending on your perspective on packaged UI.
    • As an open source vendor, Camunda is under-covered in analyst reports.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Microsoft BizTalk is over engineered for some situtations
    • Microsoft BizTalk can be frustrating to use as it forces you to use the GUI as opposed to code
    • Microsoft BizTalk is very resource intensive to create integrations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Camunda
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    BizTalk will always be required at this hospital.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Camunda
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    I gave a 7 because this product BizTalk does need time and training to get familiar with the usability and features, it is not that easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Camunda
    Camunda provides pretty standard product support offerings.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    BizTalk Server has been supported for more than 15 years. It is well proven in the market. Microsoft has provided excellent support with technical issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Camunda
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Make sure you have everybody and all depts. On board during testing on test server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Camunda
    Lacks good documentation. Training and documentation is geared towards those who are already technically adept. Does not have as many data integrations as other full fledged products. Paid version of Camunda is not as fully fledged as other products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    BizTalk was selected here mainly because it is easy to integrate to a .NET application (most of them are Web Service, WCF SOAP, WCF REST and Web API) and many backend databases are Microsoft SQL Server. Another benefit is that the monitoring job is easy to set up and centralize with other .NET application monitoring jobs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Camunda
    • The positive impact is that we are able to ensure the business process is being followed and that results in orders getting processed successfully leading to customer satisfaction and revenue
    • Another positive impact is that we are able to track any anomalies and any errors in the order flow and retry them so that users don't have a negative experience.
    • A negative point is that it is an overhead to maintain so there is significant engineering effort getting invested there
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • A positive impact has been the quicker turnaround time of a part request and that part showing up in SAP using Biztalk as middleware.
    • A somewhat negative impact has been the somewhat insufficient error logging/message capture settings that Biztalk provide. This has caused occasional delays when attempted to create parts for the business.
    • A somewhat negative impact has been the need to have a specialized developer who understands Biztalk to troubleshoot issues with the Biztalk and SAP interaction when creating parts, and when adding new fields to the parts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Camunda Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot