Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes vs. CircleCI vs. Docker
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes | Score7.7 out of 10 | N/A | Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes is an enterprise Kubernetes solution for multi-cloud operations. Ubuntu is the reference platform for Kubernetes on all major public clouds. Canonical Kubernetes is built on Ubuntu and aims to combine security with optimal price-performance. Canonical's cloud-native automation framework ensures developer productivity and business innovation. | N/A |
CircleCI | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | CircleCI is a software delivery engine from the company of the same name in San Francisco, that helps teams ship software faster, offering their platform for Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD). Ultimately, the solution helps to map every source of change for software teams, so they can accelerate innovation and growth. | $0 for up to 6,000 build minutes and up to 5 active users per month |
Docker | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | Docker Enterprise was sold to Mirantis in 2019; that product is now sold as Mirantis Kubernetes Engine. But Docker now offers a 2-product suite that includes Docker Desktop, which they present as a fast way to containerize applications on a desktop; and, Docker Hub, a service for finding and sharing container images with a team and the Docker community, a repository of container images with an array of… | $5 per month |
| Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes | CircleCI | Docker | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes | CircleCI | Docker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Considered Multiple Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | |||
| Would buy again | |||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | 100% Would buy again 14 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | |
| Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes | CircleCI | Docker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 | AWS CodePipeline Score6.6 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | SUSE Rancher Score9.4 out of 10 | AWS CodePipeline Score6.6 out of 10 | JFrog Artifactory Score8.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes | CircleCI | Docker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Availability | - | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 7.8 | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 6.9 | - |
| Product Scalability | - | - | 10.0 |
| Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes | CircleCI | Docker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
|
| ScreenShots |






