Item: CircleCI
Rating: 9
Author: Shivang Kar

Overall Satisfaction with CircleCI

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use CircleCI as our centralised Continuous Delivery engine for our platform. It orchestrates the entire application lifecycle, from code commit to deployment, across our distinct environments and two major platforms (Web and Mobile). It addresses the following Business Problems: 1. CircleCI eliminates our Environment Inconsistency, by automated builds in isolated Docker environments that ensure code behaves identically in production as it does during our development. 2. CircleCI accelerates our Mobile releases by automating the complex build-and-sign process for iOS and Android with Fastlane, and we significantly reduce manual effort and time-to-market for mobile updates. 3. CircleCI enhances our security & compliance by integrating Snyk scans automatically, which allows us to detect vulnerabilities in dependencies and containers before deployment, ensuring every release meets security standards. 4. CircleCI helps us in mitigating our Production risks by implementing manual approval gates, which prevent accidental deployments, giving our team control and confidence in update rollouts.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Specialized macOS infrastructure for iOS builds.
Orbs for rapid and flawless AWS integration.
Production Safety Valves (approval jobs).
Context based security.
Multi-Architecture workflow orchestration.

Cons

Caching in CircleCI is manual and brittle. We have to craft specific cache keys, where mistyping would lead to stale caches or no cache at all.
Job failures could be handled better.
It's often hard to know exactly how much a specific job or workflow costs.
Secrets management for local builds could be improved.
Sometimes the config files becomes huge and repetitive.

Return on Investment

Faster Releases - since our deployment is automated, our releases are faster, enabling us to deliver new features or bug fixes to our customers quickly, improving our customer ratings.
No need for a large infra team to manage deployments. Since our deployments are automated with CircleCI, we have a leaner infrastructure team, which reduces costs.
No need to teach any developers about deployments. Since builds and deployments are automated, developers can focus solely on development without worrying about deploying to the testing or production environments. This allows us to build more features faster.

Usability

The reliability & speed, it just works. The ability to spin up macOS runners and Docker containers on demand without managing hardware is a huge win. The Orbs system makes integrating with AWS and Slack incredibly easy, saving us weeks of custom scripting and providing real-time updates in our Slack channel. This makes it easy for us to track and ensures that everyone involved knows the status. Of course, it has drawbacks related to configuration complexity and, in some cases, cost transparency, but overall, it is an industry-standard, robust tool that solves our core infrastructure problems well.

Alternatives Considered

Jenkins and Azure Pipelines

CircleCI shines with its specialized infrastructure. Its dedicated macOS runners ensure blazing-fast iOS builds, while intelligent Docker layer caching significantly reduces backend build times and costs. The ability to SSH directly into failed builds dramatically accelerates debugging. Furthermore, its certified Orbs provide standardized, secure integrations with AWS and Slack, reducing the stability and security risks often associated with unverified community plugins on competing platforms such as GitHub Actions.

Key Insights

Do you think CircleCI delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with CircleCI's feature set?

Yes

Did CircleCI live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of CircleCI go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy CircleCI again?

Yes

Other Software Used

Jenkins, LeadSquared, Freshdesk, Slack, Figma, Atlassian Bitbucket, Zoho People Plus

Likelihood to Recommend

Based on our experience, CircleCI is well-suited for automating mobile app release cycles. For example, to release an iOS app, you would need to build, sign, and upload it to TestFlight, which requires a dedicated Mac in the office. But with CircleCI, you can have macOS executors, so you don't have to manage a physical build machine. Another benefit is that CircleCI's certified AWS Orbs abstract away complex authentication and deployment logic, allowing us to build, push, and deploy Docker containers to Amazon ECS with minimal configuration and high reliability. CircleCI is less suited for smaller projects where the development and deployment are not that extensive, for example, a static site. Once you have built a static site, you probably won't make any further changes, so there's no point in paying for it.

CircleCI Feature Ratings

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Reliable high-performance CICD for complex Mobile Cloud workflows.