Carbonite by OpenText vs. IBM Storage for Red Hat OpenShift
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Carbonite by OpenText | Score7.1 out of 10 | N/A | Carbonite by OpenText (also replacing the former EVault products acquired from Seagate in 2016) is a cloud backup solution for small business. Designed to recover anything from a single file to an entire system with the click of a button, Carbonite users can protect virtually any type of file. | N/A |
![]() IBM Storage for Red Hat OpenShift | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Storage for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform provides the infrastructure foundation and storage orchestration for a full-platform on-premises hybrid multicloud environment that supports CSI. IBM now supports CSI for its block and file storage families so you can improve container utilization in Kubernetes environments with market-leading virtualization, data reduction and copy data management. | N/A |
| Carbonite by OpenText | IBM Storage for Red Hat OpenShift | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Carbonite by OpenText | IBM Storage for Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Carbonite by OpenText | IBM Storage for Red Hat OpenShift | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Center Backup |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Enterprise Backup |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carbonite by OpenText | IBM Storage for Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Acronis Cyber Protect Score8.7 out of 10 | Cyberduck Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | MSP360 Backup Score7 out of 10 | Cisco UCS Manager Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score9.4 out of 10 | Cisco UCS Manager Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Carbonite by OpenText | IBM Storage for Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 5.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.7 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.2 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 6.4 | - |
| Carbonite by OpenText | IBM Storage for Red Hat OpenShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| ![]()
|
| Pros |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| ![]()
|
| Return on Investment |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |





