Castle vs. Cisco Duo

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Castle
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Castle is a solution for protecting customers in web and mobile apps. The vendor says their simple developer-friendly APIs lets users send activity from web and mobile apps. Castle builds behavior models over what's normal for the user’s site and each user account. When there is a potential account takeover, the customer is notified and can resolve the incident without involving the site administrator. Additionally, the vendor says the security analytics dashboard offers complete visibility into…
$33
per month (per 10,000 good events)
Cisco Duo
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Duo is a two-factor authentication system (2FA), acquired by Cisco in October 2018. It provides single sign-on (SSO) and endpoint visibility, as well as access controls and policy controlled adaptive authentication.
$3
per month per user
Pricing
CastleCisco Duo
Editions & Modules
Professional
$33
per month (per 10,000 good events)
Enterprise
$2,800
per month (per 1,000,000 good events)
Duo Essentials
$3
per month per user
Duo Advantage
$6
per month per user
Duo Premier
$9
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CastleCisco Duo
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CastleCisco Duo
Best Alternatives
CastleCisco Duo
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.4 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.4 out of 10
Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra ID
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CastleCisco Duo
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(160 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(10 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(76 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(9 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(90 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(10 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(9 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(3 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
CastleCisco Duo
Likelihood to Recommend
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
It is a very compete and solid solution Once it is in place, and you have configured the different settings and policies it is consistent and works well. It does take some time to work the kinks out. We had a Cisco support provider assist us while we stepped through the process of getting it set up.
Read full review
Pros
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
  • We use Cisco Duo with different type of device and application, but we never face any difficulties to integrate Cisco Duo with any of them.
  • We integrated Cisco Duo with some of our active directory and some of the OS are quite old but Cisco Duo works totally fine with them.
  • The end user application is very easy to use. We never had any complain from non tech team members of having trouble of using Cisco Duo.
  • There are several authentication methods available rather than passcode. I personally like the push notification which is always on time and quite fast.
Read full review
Cons
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
  • Documentation is oftentimes missing key information for proper implementation. This is circumvented by reading third-party guides or contacting support for additional details.
  • They do not push Fail-Closed as much as I think they should. Fail-Open is fairly trivial to bypass and it should be made known to the customer during setup how much this will affect overall security.
  • More vendor integration is something that is always craved by administrators. There are so many third-parties to integrate with.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
There are a lot of competing solutions on the market; however, Duo "just works", and there is little to no learning curve for the new members to be acclimated to it. As long as that continues I see it as the preferred option moving forward
Read full review
Usability
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
La interfaz es intuitiva y fácil de navegar, lo que permite a los usuarios administrar sus dispositivos y acceder a las políticas sin problemas. La integración con las aplicaciones SSO y SaaS facilita aún más el proceso de acceso, mejorando la experiencia del usuario.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
In the last 5+ years we've been using Duo, there may have been 1 outage that impacted us. We do receive periodic notifications of issues but, for the most part, they impact carriers or functionality that we either don't use, or do not care about.
Read full review
Performance
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
We do not see any degradation of performance of the protected applications. There are occasional lags in receiving the push but no show stooppers.
Read full review
Support Rating
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
I have not needed direct support for Cisco Secure Access by Duo as I have not had a problem with it, but I have full confidence that the support is outstanding. It is now a core component of the corporate technology stack - a problem would mean a serious degradation in the ability of the company to function.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
There was no in person training but checking the box was the only way I could complete all of the questions.
Read full review
Online Training
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
This was not organized training but the videos that Duo provides to teach you how to install a particular integration are top notch.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Implementation was straight forward and you can isolate different scenarios in order to test new application setup or add to an existing setup. Gui interface is pretty easy to understand and follow. I had no experience with Duo and still manage to easily set up new policies and rules.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
I would fully expect a competitor like Okta or any other multifactor mechanic to function pretty similarly, and I hesitate to say duos the best. I think the idea is that it's a simple concept, but it does it well. So I haven't evaluated any myself outside of duo, but I'm also not in the market and I don't feel like we need to go shopping for something else.
Read full review
Scalability
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
So far, the only limits we've encountered were tied to our imagination. Duo's strong list of supported integrations is amazing.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Castle Intelligence Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cisco
  • Assess user risk within minutes
  • Cisco Secure Access by Duo cloud-based MFA eliminates the need for on-prem appliances and hardware; you don't need to invest in your data center
  • There is no on-going maintenance or service costs, eliminating time to patch and update
  • No required important IT time and extra resources beyond implementation
Read full review
ScreenShots

Castle Screenshots

Screenshot of See which devices and locations that are part of a users normal behaviorScreenshot of Approve and Flag Threats from the dashboard, or let your users take action through the self-service login notification emailsScreenshot of Build custom Threat Segments to highlight users with specific properties such as Tor IPs or high authentication risk