Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
Caterease
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Editions & Modules
Express
$85
per month
Standard
$125
per month
Professional
$165
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Caterease
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Prices are available at a 20% discount if billed annually.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Caterease
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.62 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
23% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
7.49 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
6.011 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
25% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
2.12 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
16% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Production Management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Caterease and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Integration with Microsoft Access - We use Access for a lot of different Queries, such as for our bar back to know the specifics of each bar. Caterease allows Access to pull data directly so all we have to do is run the report instead of entering all the information manually. Same with diagramming, having software like Placez that pulls from Caterease allows for such things as table and chair counts to be pulled directly from Caterease instead of having to place each individual table.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It’s a great program, but it’s missing some aspects that would be incredibly useful. It has the ability to store venues and locations that you’ve used in the past, but it doesn’t allow you to associate a tax rate with the saved venue. As our company handles events all throughout Southern California and tax rates are constantly changing, it would be nice to be able to assign certain tax rates to certain zip codes and venues.
It can be a little finicky sometimes with its equipment conflict algorithm. There will be events In the system that have been marked as cancelled, yet it will insist that an event I am working on has an equipment conflict with it (even though that event is not going through). It will not let you save out of your event and, sometimes, will end up deleting all your changes and progress, which is incredibly frustrating.
I wish there was a way to export PDFs of your proposals without re-saving your entire proposal. Sometimes, clients will ask for two versions of the same proposal with just slight changes, and it’s annoying to have to go in and completely re-do and save the proposal and have to adjust it back to the original.
It would be nice if there was a way to see a history of all of the changes that had been made in a proposal, that would be great. Because we often have many hands on each event we do, having a comprehensive list of all the changes made to each proposal and the date and times, and users who made these changes would be an incredible asset.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have not had to use the support in my over 3 years of using Caterease. This is why I gave it a 9 rating because even though I haven't had to interact with support, the fact that I haven't had to use support speaks volumes to how good the software is and how it is user friendly.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I haven’t used too many other events programs in the past – at a former company, we used the back end of our website in order to create events, but Caterease is a lot more user-friendly. Our website wasn’t particularly fancy – it didn’t allow us to conflict check or see if there was another event at the same time. It was used for the sole purpose of posting the information to our system – not for creating full proposals. Caterease is much more effective for what we need to use it for in this context.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info